Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Strictly, the only proofs in science are analytic (formal logic and mathematics).
Actually it's the other way around.
Not all the sciences are equal when it comes to how they're done. Physics for example can explain the observable movement of planets, just like the Pythagorean theorem explains the relationship of three sides of a right angle triangle. This is why you won't hear in school "the argument of Pythagorean theorem is following....". Darwinian theory on the other hand lacks that kind of structure, it too relies on an argument made up of a series of anecdotes and hunches as Dr. David Berlinkski points out.
Take the design-proof: "the Nature is more complex than watch, the latter is designed, so the Nature is designed." What is supposed here?
As others have pointed out, physics doesn't have proofs either; it's the math used in physics that has proofs. Physics has evidence: observations and experiments that support the idea that a particular mathematical model is a good description of reality.
Paul warns of that with strong words:
The Nature is more difficult to understand, than a watch. The latter must be designed, no way around the designer (because the watch is difficult to understand). So, the Nature is designed.
