Why I Think Christmas is Not Biblical (Please read OP before posting).

Kaon

Well-Known Member
Mar 12, 2018
5,676
2,349
Los Angeles
✟111,507.00
Country
United States
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Celibate
Even if it incorporated pagan elements from the converted Christians I will not give Christmas away to the Pagans because of this. The only ones really complaining are mostly the Pagans themselves.

I am not pagan. I didn't truly stop celebrating Christmas until I was in my mid 20's - after a lot of my own research, giving up Christmas-taking it back-giving it up, and a general spiritual odyssey for truth. It was not easy to reconcile how historically pagan some "Christian" holidays are, but I had to get over if since it is a matter of the spirit.

What is the saying, "Can't put lipstick on a pig"? How can we be justified celebrating Solis Invictus by calling it Christian and claiming we are crusading against the pagans?
 
Upvote 0

Albion

Facilitator
Dec 8, 2004
111,138
33,258
✟583,842.00
Country
United States
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married

I guess we must just disagree. To me, false prophets and destructive heresies escribe incorrect teachings and teachers and a breaking of fellowship, not a literal use of force, violence, etc.
 
Upvote 0

Kaon

Well-Known Member
Mar 12, 2018
5,676
2,349
Los Angeles
✟111,507.00
Country
United States
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Celibate
Most of the stuff you said is taken for the Anti-Christian Christ Myth Theory that everything related Christianity is a rip off from pagan myths.
Also, we aren't Jews but Christians, and they deny Christ so what does it matter?

If you want to believe it is "anti-Christian Christ Myth Theory" that is your prerogative. However, the Hebrews are the people of the Most High God; they are the main audience target in the bible. Christianity is not a separate entity from Hebrews; any remnant of Hebrews that believe in the Redeemer (not all Hebrews are in Israel by far) are Christians, and the natural trajectory of the Hebrew is to be a Christian.

The disciples were the first Christians, but they wouldn't call themselves "Christian" because they always believed in the Most High God, and the resurrection of the Word of God. They are just Hebrews (natural progression of an Hebrew).

It is the Christians of modernity that make the distinction between Christian and Hebrew. If we are adopted as Hebrews, we need to behave like them; we don't get to get the title without reflecting it.
 
Upvote 0

Ken Rank

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jan 12, 2014
7,218
5,563
Winchester, KENtucky
✟308,985.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
I guess we must just disagree. To me, false prophets and destructive heresies escribe incorrect teachings and teachers and a breaking of fellowship, not a literal use of force, violence, etc.
Brother, Thayer bible lexicon and Liddell-Scott bible lexicon are who defined the word first as storming a city or taking by force, not me.
 
Upvote 0

Ronald

Exhortations
Site Supporter
Jul 30, 2004
4,620
982
southern
✟111,578.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Regardless of whether we have the correct date of His birth take note:
The angels worshipped Him in the field where He laid. Wise men gave gifts to Him as we do eachother.
True, His Resurrection is the most important day in history, but His birth was a miracle. GOD emptied Himself into Mary's womb. She was conceived by the Holy Spirit, a prophecy fulfilled and long awaited for. Keep in mind the Jews celebrated many feasts, special days to remember. Christ's birth is one important one, the day our Savior came. He may have been born on 9-11-3BC, who knows. The Day they chose overshadowed and eventually destroyed a pagan holiday -- good.
We are called to focus on things above and not be slaves to worldly things. His birth was a miracle, not worldly. True the holiday has become materialistic and many lose the meaning, which is about our Savior. Celebrating His birth IS in essence confirming His death and resurrection - they are inseparable.
A monk traveling through Germania long ago passed through a village of Druids (who worshipped trees), to spread the gospel. He told them trees did not have spirits and to prove it, he said he would chop down the largest one in the forest. They said he would be cursed and were frightened. He did it, nothing happened and then he dedicated that tree to the true God, our Lord and Savior. From that time on, it became tradition and decorations were added and so IT'S ALL GOOD.
It's Biblical, and the true spirit of the celebration is not lost in materialism. True Christians know, the rest of the world does not. JW's don't celebrate it but they celebrate little in life, rebeling against and labeling all holidays as pagan except weddings and anniversaries. GOD does not forbid celebrating any holiday where we include Him, where we give thanks to Him for such a day, for all His blessings, or people He has put in our lives.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Not David

I'm back!
Apr 6, 2018
7,356
5,235
25
USA
✟231,310.00
Country
United States
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
Yet the New Testament was written in Greek.
 
Upvote 0

Loren T.

Well-Known Member
Jun 26, 2018
1,003
396
56
Hadley
✟24,186.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
We talk a lot about the extravagance of Christmas, the commercialization, and it’s true, but still, we can never be more extravagant than God . So perhaps our attitudes need adjustment. God gave all that he could. He gave himself. Do you think he really frowns when you spend a bit too much on your kids or spouse?


Instead of posting a point by point answer, here is part of a blog post I did on Christmas:
So, we light up the world, we get out the manger scene, we watch the children sing Christmas carols and it’s all good, it’s all beautiful. Should I interrupt the party with the images we don’t put on the mantle?

Like a painfully young and scared Jewish girl whose swollen form writhes on the hay in the agony of labor. She doesn’t wear a halo and her robes are neither white nor clean, but stained with blood. The incarnation itself is a divine mystery, but the birth is normal and messy as births tend to be. With due respect to my Catholic friends, we tend to put Mary on too much of a pedestal, I think. The serene smile and clean robed Mary kneeling adoringly at the foot of the manger without a hair out of place-do you really believe that’s how it was? Perhaps a more accurate image would be of Mary kneeling and trying to sop up Jesus’ blood after his torture session, in the “Passion of the Christ.” Whether this scene really happened or not, it is a perfect illustration of Mary’s role in his story. And it does show both her humble acceptance and raw courage. And isn’t this what good mother’s do? Mopping up after their children both figuratively and often mopping up blood literally, while bleeding inside because she can’t take her child’s pain onto herself. That is a mother’s heart.

But, still, faith is always about trusting in spite of fear, in spite of doubt. I think she felt fear, felt doubt, and cried out in pain and begged God for a normal life. I think she got irritated, even angry, at her perfect son for his sometimes baffling behavior. Because she was human and like the rest of us, in need of forgiveness. As Mark Lowry wrote in “Mary, did you know?” the child she delivered would later deliver her. She needed a Savior as much as the rest of us do.

As another song says, it must have seemed to both her and Joseph, “Such a strange way to save the world.”

We like to say God came to earth in the most humble of ways, but to put an even finer point on it, even if Christ had been born in a castle, the son of a noble woman, on silk sheets, it still would have been a humble birth for the son of God.

The wonder of that night isn’t only in the miracles and the songs of angels and the worshiping shepherds. The wonder is also in how seemingly ordinary it all was. An ordinary girl has an ordinary birth, in an ordinary small town and probably later faces the ordinary gossip by those who knew she was pregnant too soon. What kind of God begins his most important mission with scandal and a helpless baby instead of a warrior and armies?

Sure, the birth was announce by angels, but only to a few grubby shepherds. Other than that, God goes incognito, speaking to Joseph in dreams and nightmares, telling only a handful of people about the most important news the world has ever seen. The Savior sneaks into the world as if on a covert op into enemy territory, which was exactly what he was doing. Certainly, it was a Holy Night to those few who knew that this was no normal baby. To the rest of the human world, the whole thing went unnoticed for a couple of years, at which time King Herod murders a bunch of baby boys because of his paranoia and the loose lips of some “wise men.” from the east. And God doesn’t do anything too dramatic, even then. He sends some more dreams to the not so wise men and to Joseph, so they can get out of Dodge while the getting is good. He doesn’t zap Herod or send an army of angels to protect Jesus. He just has the key players sneak over to Egypt for awhile.

Just a side note: Did Joseph ever get confused about all the dreams? Did he ever wake up and say:

“Mary, we have to get out of town! I had a dream last night that a white elephant knocked the house down and stepped on your foot!”

And Mary rolls her eyes.

“Joseph, not every dream means to run for your life. It was probably just too many egg rolls mixed with the old wine last night.”

As someone who works with his hands, I think it’s way cool that Jesus didn’t grow up spending all his time studying behind a desk. Some have speculated that Joseph was probably more of a stone mason than a wood worker. Still, Jesus grew up learning a craft that required skill and muscles and hard work. The Creator of the Cosmos learned to create the slow and painful way instead of speaking planets into existence.

I heard a sermon once where the main point was that if Joseph had not married Mary, the world would not have had a Savior. Well, I think God is more resourceful then that, and big enough to work out the plan of salvation in spite of what Jesus’ parents did. Still, it seems like God picked the right step dad. Joseph could have said:

“I didn’t sign up for this.”, and dropped Mary like a hot potato. Worse, he could have shamed her in public and had her stoned. But he was an honorable man and Jesus no doubt learned about honor from him, imperfect as Joseph was. Perhaps he learned about subtlety too, and when it was needed, he kept his mission private from most until the time of fulfillment arrived. Jesus knew when to speak and when to remain silent, which is a rare talent for any leader. Is it speculating too much to say he may have learned from his human father that actions speak louder than words?

Now, I know it’s hard to imagine God learning anything, even God in human form, but scripture says he did just that. What does it mean to grow in favor with God and man? There is a question you sometimes hear-whether it was possible for Jesus to sin. We know he didn’t, but could he have? Right off the bat, this brings up another question, just what is sin? Sure, we know the obvious ones, outlined in the Ten Commandments, but what about the not so obvious ones? Jesus would say later that if you did something in your heart, you were guilty of it. How could Jesus, who was already perfect, grow in favor with God? Doesn’t this suggest that God can change somehow? That already being perfect in all his intentions, he somehow became more perfect in his actions?

What did Simeon prophesy about him? (Luke 2:34)

“He will be the cause of the falling and rising of many in Israel and be a sign that will be spoken against, so that the thoughts of many hearts will be revealed.”

Uh-huh. Jesus offends some people. People get uncomfortable when he’s mentioned. We call him the Prince of peace, but he himself said he came to bring division:

34Do not assume that I have come to bring peace to the earth; I have not come to bring peace, but a sword. 35For I have come to turn ‘A man against his father, a daughter against her mother, a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law.…36A man’s enemies will be the members of his own household.

Wow, that doesn’t sound too peaceful. He came to divide those whose hearts would choose to accept him and those who would harden their hearts against him. Notice how Simeon puts it: “The thoughts of many hearts will be revealed.” This sword of his cuts not flesh and bone, but it cuts to the heart and lays bare our true selves, so we MUST choose to accept or reject his message.

People like to say: “Keep Christ in Christmas.” The truth is, even people who do not know him say it sometimes, I suppose because it sounds nice and who doesn’t like a cute baby who never cries, laughing at the antics of the animals around his manger on a “Silent Night”? First of all, I think Jesus did cry and I don’t think the animals went out of their way to entertain him. But, who knows? But, in reality, despite appearances, this wasn’t a silent night. Not where it really mattered. This was the night when God invaded Satan’s territory and you can bet swords clashed in the heavens.

It’s great that you love the baby, but he doesn’t stay a baby, and he’s coming back as a warrior king… and that’s a story you don’t hear much on Christmas. If you listen closely, behind the singing angels you might hear the screams of demons being thrown back into the pit. You might hear the sound of a million praying saints and a million sinners cursing them for their prayers. You might hear a crowd chanting; “Crucify him!” and Satan laughing with delight. Or Disciples shouting “He is risen!” and the happy laughter of some of the same people who called for his death, celebrating their own re births. For over two thousand years, a war has raged over this child in the manger, over this bloody, naked man on a Roman cross, and history was split by his coming, B.C. to A.D.

The baby has grown and his question haunts all who care enough to listen:

“Who do YOU say that I am?”

That’s the only question worth thinking about when you know what Christmas is-Christ Mass. Mass meaning “A sending out”. So when you tell someone “Merry Christmas.” you are saying “Merry Christ sending”. He was sent to save a dying world. And that sending was a mission that included his death. Some have taken great offense to the thought that Christ Mass can mean: “Merry Death Sacrifice.” Because, that is what they celebrate. Mass includes the Eucharist-Communion to us Protestants. We celebrate Christ’s birth this time of year, but you can’t celebrate the birth without the death. Remembering the Cross at Christmas isn’t morbid, and you can’t have the baby without the blood. Celebrating his death is totally appropriate, as long as we know death doesn’t get the final word.. and He lives again that death may die.

So, Merry Christ’s Birth and Death and Resurrection to all and to all a good night!
 
Upvote 0

LittleLambofJesus

Hebrews 2:14.... Pesky Devil, git!
Site Supporter
May 19, 2015
125,492
28,588
73
GOD's country of Texas
Visit site
✟1,237,270.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Libertarian
One of the greatest prophecies fulfilled.......I love the story of Mary/Jesus and Elizabeth/John

New House New Stones
Birth of Jesus and John the Baptist


Malachi 3:1
"Behold! I am sending My messenger, and he hath prepared a way before Me,
And suddenly come in unto His Temple doth 'Adown/Lord-Master<113> Whom ye are seeking,
Even the Messenger of the Covenant, Whom ye are desiring.
Behold! He is coming" says Yahweh of Hosts
.

The 1st time Jesus and John meet.....what an awesome event between Mary and Elizabeth:

Luke 1:
41 And it came to pass, as Elizabeth heard the greeting of Mary, the baby in her womb leaped. And Elizabeth was filled with the Holy Spirit,
42 and she cried out in a loud voice and said, “Blessed are you among women, and blessed is the fruit of your womb.
43 And from where is this to me, that the mother of my Lord should come to me?
44 For behold! as the voice of your greeting came into my ears, the baby in my womb leaped in exultation
.

Luke 2:34
And Simon blesses them and said toward Mary, the mother of Him, "Behold! this-One is set for the Falling and Resurrection/ana-stasin <386> of many in Israel
and into a Sign spoken against
"-- [Ezekiel 37 "valley of bones]

1st time Jesus comes to the Temple.
They have no idea, [yet], that this 12 yr old boy is in fact the Son of God/Yahweh, that is standing right in front of them.[Revelation 2:18] Oh to have been there!


Luke 2:42
42 And when He was twelve years old, they went up to Jerusalem according to the custom of the feast.
46 Now so it was that after three days they found Him in the Temple, sitting in the midst of the Teachers, both listening to them and asking them questions.
And all who heard Him were astonished at His understanding and answers.
[Isaiah 11:6 "..and a little child shall lead them"]

Then John and Jesus meet at the Jordan river at the Baptism.........Awesome!


John 1:6
6 There came a man who was sent from God. His name was John.
29 The next day, John saw Jesus coming toward him and said, “Behold! The Lamb<286> of the God Who takes away the sin of the world!
36 And looking at Jesus as He walked, he said, “Behold! the Lamb<286> of the God!”
 
Last edited:
Reactions: Ken Rank
Upvote 0

Kaon

Well-Known Member
Mar 12, 2018
5,676
2,349
Los Angeles
✟111,507.00
Country
United States
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Celibate
Yet the New Testament was written in Greek.

Because the "World" language was Greek at the time.

People in all around the world speak English; not everyone is American, English, Irish or Scottish, and English may not be their first or second language.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Albion

Facilitator
Dec 8, 2004
111,138
33,258
✟583,842.00
Country
United States
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Brother, Thayer bible lexicon and Liddell-Scott bible lexicon are who defined the word first as storming a city or taking by force, not me.
...and I don't fault that definition. It doesn't mean, however, that the word heresy, as used in religion, means the same thing as the word originally meant. There is a connection, yes. The meaning in church history and theology is derived from the original meaning, but it certainly does not mean violence, storming a city by force, etc. I tried to explain that earlier but I probably did not do a good job of it.
 
Upvote 0

LittleLambofJesus

Hebrews 2:14.... Pesky Devil, git!
Site Supporter
May 19, 2015
125,492
28,588
73
GOD's country of Texas
Visit site
✟1,237,270.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Libertarian
Ken Rank said:
Brother, Thayer bible lexicon and Liddell-Scott bible lexicon are who defined the word first as storming a city or taking by force, not me.
Hi Albion.
Did you happen to see my post #144?


Why I Think Christmas is Not Biblical (Please read OP before posting).
Post #144

 
Upvote 0

Der Alte

This is me about 1 yr. old.
Site Supporter
Aug 21, 2003
28,580
6,065
EST
✟994,124.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
<K>I am not pagan. I didn't truly stop celebrating Christmas until I was in my mid 20's - after a lot of my own research, giving up Christmas-taking it back-giving it up, and a general spiritual odyssey for truth. It was not easy to reconcile how historically pagan some "Christian" holidays are, but I had to get over if since it is a matter of the spirit.
What is the saying, "Can't put lipstick on a pig"? How can we be justified celebrating Solis Invictus by calling it Christian and claiming we are crusading against the pagans?<end>
The anti-Christmas diatribes are early this year. I have been active on this forum for about 2 decades and every year before Christmas the "Christmas is pagan" diatribes begin. First you have the name wrong. It is not "solis Invictus" it is "Sol Invictus." Strike one. "Sol Invictus" was celebrated at the winter solstice which this year is Dec 21. NOT 25. Strike 2.
.....Some people when they hear something like this "pagan Christmas" nonsense they do actual research others believe anything they read online as long as it attacks or criticizes anything Christian. Nothing pagan has been incorporated into the Christian observance of the birth of Jesus. Nothing! All the commercial stuff trees, wreaths, etc. are outside the church. Christians are not responsible for what non-Christians do on Dec 25 or any other day of the year.
 
Upvote 0

mama2one

Well-Known Member
Apr 8, 2018
9,161
10,089
U.S.A.
✟257,683.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Christmas and Easter are the two biggest celebrations in any and every church that we've ever attended

churches put out their nativities but they also decorate the churches whether it is poinsettias, Christmas trees, or wreaths and garland

should we therefore boycott church at Christmas time?

some churches do extra collections for the needy and one church we've attended donates the entire Christmas collection (to needy outside the church)

I'm wondering why this ^ is all wrong?

Christmas is all about HOPE

this one time of year, people act kinder, give more of their money and themselves, and there's the hope that Jesus who came to us as a baby can change the hearts of people
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Dan the deacon

Well-Known Member
Jul 10, 2018
823
386
65
Perry
✟28,197.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
You can no more separate materialism from Christmas than you can separate wetness from rain. The two go hand in hand.
I suppose you are speaking of gift giving. I see nothing wrong with that. I see much wrong with how those who do not believe celebrate Christmas. But that is not how we celebrate the birth of our Lord. It is not a child's birthday party. I am pretty sure Christmas is not even his birth date. But as we do not know His actual birth date it is the day the Church decided we would celebrate his birth.
Santa and all the lies and deception are not of the Church. That is secular Christmas. To us it is the day God came to live with us as one of us. If you care not to celebrate it then don't. But you would not fit in many churches by doing so. Do you have issue with celebrating his birth? The angels didn't. The bible Doesn't. The shepherds didn't. They all worshipped. I did read your OP. I just did not agree with it. Christmas is a Christian holiday. And just like Easter, the world has made something quite different of it. But that does not make the day unholy. It shows that the world is unholy.
 
Upvote 0

HatGuy

Some guy in a hat
Jun 9, 2014
1,008
786
Visit site
✟123,338.00
Country
South Africa
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
It's interesting that the "wise men" who visited Jesus at His birth were pagan. They were literally astrologers from the East. And God used something they understood (a star) to point them to Jesus.

Wonder what that's all about?
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums