Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
OK so you admit to being relatives with the beast, and also a potato. Great, now one final admission before you slink off, will you admit you think flatworms having sex are why mankind is here and exists??Oh yes.
Lol, well, no the resemblance is less obvious until one becomes more familiar with creationists.
Crazy fable you have there. You think this why?I am saying that human beings (Late Pliocene and Pleistocene) came from immediate (Miocene) ancestors that were primates but were not human....
And you still can't find legitimate sources. If you want clarification on homologous genes you should be talking to sfs.
I know that he would be able to explain the concept to you.
Do you even understand why all of the fossil evidence supports evolution and only evolution?
um, for this to be true, there would be evidence. And in ten years none has been provided on these threads, so go ahead and break the losing streak.
gradyll, you do not understand what evidence is. That is proved by this last statement of yours. I can help you learn.
Grady, believe me when I say that SZ isn't going to give you anything. He claims to have this special knowledge but nobody's seen it.
You have only yourself to blame for that and you know it.
You have been running away from the evidence since you first showed up here:
No evidenco mi amigo.
You don't know what you are talking about.
I have offered to help you. You have denied evidence when it has been presented. You proved you did not know what evidence is by denying it.
You've offered no evidence to deny.
You know better than that. I have done so many many times. Usually in the form of links. It does not matter if you don't do links, they are still evidence. And the image of one fossil is evidence. But then, you do not know what qualifies as evidence.
You've offered not one smidgen of evidence that all of life is the result of only naturalistic mechanisms acting on a single life form from long long ago. None. Zero. Nada. Zip.
gradyll, gradyll, gradyll, more bogus sources. Feather evolution is fairly well understood. The appearance of feathers did not mean the end of scales. That is a silly assumption to make. Feathers existed long before flight. Feathers had the original purpose of insulation and then display purposes. Flight was a much later use. You can read more about it here:
Feather evolution
last time I ckecked scales didnt fly very well. that is unless your link proves the existence of puff the magic dragon.
gradyll, you do not understand what evidence is. That is proved by this last statement of yours. I can help you learn.
Please try to make a post that makes sense.
The first feathers were incredibly simple. They were a single filament. In fact there are still quite a few different feather types today:
I already told you that feathers were not originally for flight. Flight evolved much later.
then try to find an article proving the percentage of homologous genes that are similiar between humans and chimpanzees. I know they exist but I couldn't find any. I bet you cant either. so no I dont think you can help.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?