Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Translated for lurkers....he cannot make anything valid in all his house of evo cards without that same state past he cannot prove. Flush.The only thing that is absurd is your hand-waving and ad hoc past state fantasy.
Translated for lurkers....he cannot make anything valid in all his house of evo cards without that same state past he cannot prove. Flush.
I have given plenty of evidence for same state past. Not my fault you take a stance that can literally support ANY concept. Want to deny an observation? No problem. Just make up some malarkey about how things were different in the past. One could, using your method, even refute arguments that go against the Flying Spaghetti Monster.
Your past state explanations are so malleable, they explain absolutely nothing.
The "study" that found 60-70% is, as far as I know, the only one of it's kind. No scientific study has published results in that manner. So, comparing it to ANY other similarity percentage study and drawing comparisons is apples to oranges.
Nothing that did not require us FIRST believing in it! We might as well believe the spagetti monster was the first ancestor.I have given plenty of evidence for same state past.
It doesn't matter whether "your" method is the right or wrong way, or not. That is not what the issue is here.
The issue is that you are comparing two different methods; apples and oranges.
And no, we didn't evolve from cats. We didn't evolve from chimps, either. We DO share a common ancestor with both. Our common ancestor with cats was much, much longer ago than our common ancestor with chimps.
No, I don't.
Especially since it is not claimed that feathers evolved from scales.
Do you see how incredibly illogical your demand is?
ETA: You also are much less likely to make foolish mistakes as you did in this post if you understood the nature of evidence.
And there was no begging the question on the validity of evolution. The validity of evolution was proven long long before we were worrying about such details.
thats because it takes sequencing into consideration, while most will find say a homologous gene and base it's percentages on the one in common, not on sequencing that is uncommon.
No, I am not going to do that. That is too far outside my area of expertise. Ask sfs for help. I already pointed out how you incorrectly compared different measurements.
I was talking about helping you understand the nature of evidence. What makes evidence valid or not. Then you could answer when people claim that you are using poor sources.
sad, truly sad.
I will call you a feline now.
here kitty kitty
besides with 90% homologous genes in common and chimps not much higher, how can you honestly say our common ancestor with cats was "much longer ago."?
with no evidence?
I noticed your signature, ironic.
I mean because macro evolution is unobserved, and how can it possibly test any hypothesis, without observation, in fact how can it even be a theory. How can it even be falsifiable without observation to begin with?
again your theory, or lack of a science theory, is apparent.
sad, truly sad.
I will call you a feline now.
here kitty kitty
besides with 90% homologous genes in common and chimps not much higher, how can you honestly say our common ancestor with cats was "much longer ago."?
with no evidence?
OK so you admit to being relatives with the beast, and also a potato. Great, now one final admission before you slink off, will you admit you think flatworms having sex are why mankind is here and exists??
Just out of interest, have you ever been abroad?
Yes- 11 countries, including 5 in Europe.
I visited around 20 Christian Churches, and I noticed all tour guides referred to "B.C." as "Before Christ". But you haven't really asked me a relevant question yet, so I will ask you.
What evidence do you base your belief in Darwinian evolution, and what is your academic background?
I do know Europe has diverse beliefs like the USA, though not 77% Christian like the USA. Apparently Great Britain is 54% Christian.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?