justlookinla
Regular Member
Can't post much without your typical 'yer a liar' shtick, can you?
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I was responding to your dishonest post
If you thought the bible needed re proving forget it. That is known and not a matter of debate here. Your denial really amounts to hot air.Wrong. If you had any "proof" you would have posted them. In fact there is no "proof" for the Bible.
People have been realizing that now that information flows so much more easily thanks to the internet. That is why atheism has been growing at such a rapid pace recently.
No, not Jesus. According to your Bible your God did that.
As free men!And there was no changing of the law. Even in the New Testament slaves are told to obey their masters
So? The world has lots of wrong. All of it is the result of sin, which believers are set free from. Death too.But I am not walking opposite of the way of the godly. I knew that slavery was wrong when I was a Christian and I still know it is wrong.
Yep, this is true. Notice the frequent 'liar' references instead of actual discussion.
Been going on for quite a while now.
Can't post much without your typical 'yer a liar' shtick, can you?
If the son shall set you free you are free indeed.
Joh 8:34 Jesus replied, "I assure you that everyone who sins is a slave of sin.
John 8:36 - If the Son therefore shall make you free, ye shall be free indeed.
As free men!
Ro 6:6 -Our old sinful selves were crucified with Christ so that sin might lose its power in our lives. We are no longer slaves to sin.
Ro 8:15 -So you should not be like cowering, fearful slaves. You should behave instead like God's very own children, adopted into his family calling him "Father, dear Father."
Ga 4:5 -God sent him to buy freedom for us who were slaves to the law, so that he could adopt us as his very own children.
To tell those employed as slaves to try to still do their job, rather than revolt, or become criminals is not much different than telling folks who work at Walmart to give 2 weeks notice if they want to quit! Many 'master's were converted when they saw their slaves were the free ones, and happy ones, and rich ones!
So? The world has lots of wrong. All of it is the result of sin, which believers are set free from. Death too.
So was God. Nothing is more real that slavery to sin and death. The Son made us free. Society of old had employment called slavery. Many people who were so employed wanted to remain in the job even when they had a choice. In the US decades ago, many people wanted to leave the military, which they were forced to be in. Slavery is just a name that is selectively applied, usually by those unable or unwilling to admit they are not free.dad, we are talking about real slavery. Not metaphoric slavery.
Only the bible deals with real slavery.We are talking about how the Bible failed in regard to real slavery.
That is foul nonsense.It is such a foul deed that even the Bible recognized it by calling people "slaves to sin" but you cannot find anywhere that the Bible is opposed to actual slavery.
So was God. Nothing is more real that slavery to sin and death. The Son made us free. Society of old had employment called slavery. Many people who were so employed wanted to remain in the job even when they had a choice. In the US decades ago, many people wanted to leave the military, which they were forced to be in. Slavery is just a name that is selectively applied, usually by those unable or unwilling to admit they are not free.
Only the bible deals with real slavery.
That is foul nonsense. Hows them apples?
Nothing is more real that slavery to sin and death. The Son made us free.The subject was real slavery. Not metaphorical slavery.
So was God. Nothing is more real that slavery to sin and death. The Son made us free. Society of old had employment called slavery. Many people who were so employed wanted to remain in the job even when they had a choice. In the US decades ago, many people wanted to leave the military, which they were forced to be in. Slavery is just a name that is selectively applied, usually by those unable or unwilling to admit they are not free.
Only the bible deals with real slavery.
That is foul nonsense.
Obviously you seek to fight God's word and insult believers and Him. You don't care about truth or backing up your libelous charges and slander such as saying the bible says the earth is flat etc.
Nothing is more real that slavery to sin and death. The Son made us free.
You had your chance. You are here to sling stuff.I am more than happy to give you the Flat Earth verses.
The verses you spammed were talking about when God reigns on earth. Now you must wear it.There is still the matter of you admitting you were wrong when I responded to your demand for stationary Earth claims and then you forgot that demand and totally messed up.
You had your chance. You are here to sling stuff.
The verses you spammed were talking about when God reigns on earth. Now you must wear it.
Yep, this is true. Notice the frequent 'liar' references instead of actual discussion.
Been going on for quite a while now.
I just got back from a rather long Google search. I was wondering about the claims of gradyll through his sources about Haeckel. I could find only two possible sources for the claim that Haeckel had ever joined the Thule society. They were both from anti-evolution history professors. Not the best of sources. One has been totally discredited since he took money from the Discovery Institute an extremely dishonest anti-evolution group that has been shown to be behind the formation of ID by making it creationism with a cheap suite on.
At any rate the claim is very poorly supported and fairly well debunked in this article:
http://home.uchicago.edu/rjr6/articles/Haeckel--antiSemitism.pdf
Where the author points out among other things that Haeckel was sick and bed ridden the year that he supposedly joined Thule according to Daniel Gasman (And I am sorry but the juvenile in me cannot help but laugh at that extremely appropriate and rather anal retentive name):
The work as a whole dissects and debunks the false claims against Haeckel.
All right gradyll, I have pulled up a copy of "The Evolution Handbook" and I see that quite a few of his quote are of other creationists. The problem is that those are bogus quotes on the face of them. Always go to the source. The fact that your lying sources openly quotes other liars only buries the ultimate sources of their misquoted works another layer deeper.
But here is a start. On page 16 he claims:
This is a freebie for you. Obviously this is a reference to the Big Bang. The problem is that it was not nothing, and there was no explosion. Second more properly that should be called the beginning of the universe as we know it. Stellar evolution covers the formation and growth of stars. It is simply an idiotic mistake by the author.
He starts with that lie and builds upon it. Do you need links to sites that accurately describe the Big Bang or are you willing to admit that the author of that work has already been shown to be a liar?
What is amazing as I scan down the pdf is that the writer got almost everything about science wrong. Second, he loves to use the appeal to emotion fallacy also known as "poisoning the well". As you know you falsely tried to tie evolution with Nazism, even though Hitler banned the work of Darwin. You went out found invalid sources that supported you. In fact you went out of your way to use invalid rather than valid sources, or did you forget how you linked to an author who was paid by the D.I.? That could not have been a coincidence.
And when I looked back at your post that was what you mainly had. I got so used to you quote mining that when ever I see a quote of yours I assume that is what you have. But in the post in question you did much worse:
""He [Haeckel] convinced masses of his countrymen they must accept their evolutionary destiny as a master race and outcompete inferior peoples, since it was right and natural that only the fittest should survive. His version of Darwinism was incorporated in Adolf Hitlers Mein Kampf (1925), which means My Struggle, taken from Haeckels German translation of Darwins phrase, the struggle for existence. "*R. Milner, Encyclopedia of Evolution (1990), p. 207 [also 312-313].
"In 1918, Darwins apostle Ernst Haeckel became a member of the Thule Gesellschaft, a secret, radically right-wing organization that played a key role in the establishment of the Nazi movement. Rudolf Hess and Hitler attended the meeting as guests (Phelps, 1963)."Ian Taylor, In the Minds of Men (1987), p. 488."
This is an unsupported claim by your post that was based upon Haeckel joining a conservative German party in 1918. In that post your hero quoted another bogus work, the "Encyclopedia of Evolution". You can't support a bogus work by quoting from another bogus work. That is a false appeal to authority. The writer of that pieced of garbage had no authority either.
So that's one, unless you want to go into it more. Here is the link to your extremely messed up post:
http://www.christianforums.com/t7834960-84/#post66197513
I am ending this one here since it may get too long if I continue.
The statement under discussion: "A Scientific Dissent from Darwinism" from the Discovery Institute
DizreduxGrady You do understand that natural selection does not provide genetic variability, it reduces variability. If you do not understand this that I can see where some of your problems are. You are fighting against a TOE that does not exist in reality.
DizGradyThat concept only exists in you mind, not in reality. Macroevolution has been shown to you a number of times but you reject all that does not agree with you. No, they are saying that "Careful examination of the evidence for Darwinian theory should be encouraged". Do you really think that the evidence has not and is not being carefully examined and reexamined?
DizGradyAre you really and truly unaware that mutation and natural selection are not the only mechanisms involved with evolution? You couldn't possibly be so the only thing I can think of is strongly selective willful denial.
DizGradyDiz And you did just what I predicted. At least you didn't disappoint.
GradyYou have been given examples of macroevolution over and over and you, with great determination, find ways of rejecting them all.
GradyWhat on earth does this have to do with Christianity?
GradyOK, I don't see much of a problem here but since you do I will try hard not to do it in responses to you in the future.
Dizredux
You may consider your research to be extensive but it is really *very* limited in scope in that you only seem to be looking at research that agrees with you.well your sources are expressly anti ID and taking money from non ID sources and therefore untrustworthy. (thats how you sound when you dodge the evidence given after I have done extensive research into the matter, frustrating aint it?)
well your sources are expressly anti ID and taking money from non ID sources and therefore untrustworthy. (thats how you sound when you dodge the evidence given after I have done extensive research into the matter, frustrating aint it?)
I address this in my last post.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?