Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Why don't more creationists think like Todd Wood?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="pat34lee" data-source="post: 73200697" data-attributes="member: 292469"><p>The only 'science' for the past is history. Nothing in the past can be </p><p>proven or disproven without eyewitness testimony or second or third </p><p>hand information. Nothing in fossil evidence can ever prove that </p><p>evolution happened or that any fossil is related to another.</p><p>The bones only show a creature lived.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="pat34lee, post: 73200697, member: 292469"] The only 'science' for the past is history. Nothing in the past can be proven or disproven without eyewitness testimony or second or third hand information. Nothing in fossil evidence can ever prove that evolution happened or that any fossil is related to another. The bones only show a creature lived. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Why don't more creationists think like Todd Wood?
Top
Bottom