Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Omitting the plagiarism and nonsense, if we ignore the fact that you are focusing on your ignorance of paleontology for the moment, why do you ignore all other evidence?I'll ask as I ask every evolutionist.
What evidence?..
Can creation?
The 'challenges' you toss out at evolution can be equally applied to creation.
Take that away and all that is left is evidence.
And one side clearly wins on that alone.
I mean step-by-step description of the creation of Eve from Adam's rib/side, for example, in understandable terms. No giant leaps, all the details.
See?
Again, what is left but evidence, for which there is none for creation?
Yet you have previously written that you reject evolution because you do not understand it. Are you admitting that you reject God's creation of things as well?I don't pretend to understand how God created things.
However I'll bet many evolutionists pretend to understand evolution. What you fail to realize is that my level of understanding, and lack of understanding (needs clarification) is very advanced.
I don't get why you wrote some off-topic diversion about weeds in waterways when the subject is your ignorance of things that you nevertheless pontificate on. But I do understand why so many creationists have inflated views of their own cognitive abilities - I think it is fear, primarily.I don't understand.Get it?
I already mentioned that question begging fallacies are not evidence.Except of course......The Creation.
I already mentioned that question begging fallacies are not evidence.
Allow me to show how silly your sad antics are -
I declare that "Living things are the evidence for evolution."
You ask for details.
I respond "All living things."
You ask if I am a creationist. I say no. You say "Really? Because you totally argue like one."
Almost certainly. I have worked for several companies and it has never taken me more than five and generally less than two to figure out why they do things the way they do.Same evidence, different conclusions.
My weed cutting example was presented to clarify my lack of understanding of how so-called experts think. I have worked for the same company for over 40 years, and I still don't understand why they do things the way they do.
Is it me?
Almost certainly. I have worked for several companies and it has never taken me more than five and generally less than two to figure out why they do things the way they do.
My point exactly. Incredulous means you can scarcely believe they do it the way they do it. On the other hand I understand why they feel compelled to do it the way they do it, while you remain, shaking your head.
The only thing I can come up with for why they do things the way they do is............severe mental disfunction.
That's why I don't understand why more creationists are honest about modern biology like Todd Wood is.
Clearly they are doing something right to have remained relevant for 40+ years...Unless maybe you work for Sears.
Yes, of course. So after 40 years, why are they not doing things your way?
Same evidence, different conclusions.
My weed cutting example was presented to clarify my lack of understanding of how so-called experts think. I have worked for the same company for over 40 years, and I still don't understand why they do things the way they do.
Is it me?
Sounds like a Matlock episode, where an innocent man (or woman) is always caught holding the "smoking gun," but didn't do it.Illustration.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?