- Jun 18, 2006
- 3,855,809
- 52,549
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
That's what's wrong with it.There has really been no failure of evolution as a scientific theory. It works, and it works well.
Hmmm.... Evolution, as such, IS a fact - even the more educated and sensible creationists admit that. But this is different in character than you implication - that evolutionists are hoodwinking the public.
One of the most common misconceptions concerns the so-called “scientific proofs.” Contrary to popular belief, there is no such thing as a scientific proof.
That's the colloquial use of the word. We having a scientific discussion about a scientific subject. Best to use proper verbiage.I just realized I hadn't dealt with this sufficiently.
I never mentioned "scientific proofs", just proof or prove.
There is quite a difference between the two.
Proof is: evidence or argument establishing or helping to establish a fact or the truth of a statement.
"you will be asked to give proof of your identity"
If you want a different word, then evolution cannot be corroborated.
Most likely parts of it have been tampered with
and altered. Like the fact that the NT was written
in Hebrew, not Greek, as most people think today.
Except the Jews of the early 1st century AD did not speak Hebrew. They spoke Aramaic/Chaldean, which they brought back from Captivity with them, which was written using Hebrew orthography.Like the fact that the NT was written
in Hebrew, not Greek, as most people think today.
Except the Jews of the early 1st century AD did not speak Hebrew. They spoke Aramaic/Chaldean, which the brought back from Captivity with them, which was written using Hebrew orthography.
Paul could have addressed them in Swahili for all we should care.Not to mention the fact that Paul is unlikely to have adrressed Greek speaking Corinthians/Philippians/Thessalonians/Romans in Hebrew.
So we have had Justatruthseeker, the famous astrophysicist, and now we have pat34lee, the eminent Greek and Hebrew scholar.
Not only that, but one peddling the atheist line that we can’t know what the New Testament originally said.
Not to mention the fact that Paul is unlikely to have adrressed Greek speaking Corinthians/Philippians/Thessalonians/Romans in Hebrew.
That's the colloquial use of the word. We having a scientific discussion about a scientific subject. Best to use proper verbiage.
Except it is a science. Just because pat34lee has an incorrect opinion does not change that fact.No, I was discussing how evolution is not science,
but philosophy, religion, pseudoscience or hoax.
Actually, we can know. That is how we know it was written
in Hebrew. Ever heard of Hebrewisms? The NT is full of them.
They are phrases that only make sense in Hebrew, not in Greek.
That depends on if the leaders of the churches
were Jews or Gentiles. The custom of the time
was clear. Anything dealing with spiritual matters
by Jews was written in Hebrew. Even in early
Greek manuscripts, the name YHWH was written
in paleo-Hebrew.
LOL! ROFLOL! Paul wrote to the Romans in Hebrew! LOL!That is how we know it was written
in Hebrew.
One of the most common misconceptions concerns the so-called “scientific proofs.” Contrary to popular belief, there is no such thing as a scientific proof.
In response to this:
One of the most common misconceptions concerns the so-called “scientific proofs.” Contrary to popular belief, there is no such thing as a scientific proof.
Of course, in principle new facts might be discovered that disprove evolution. However, so far as I know, the only non-evolutionary scientific hypothesis for the diversity of living things is spontaneous generation, which was supposedly disproved more than a hundred years ago. Any non-evolutionary hypothesis has to explain all the biological facts that are now explained by the theory of evolution, and, like any other scientific hypothesis, it has to make testable predictions.You replied:
And yet...
Somehow evolutionists manage to get the idea out that
evolution has been proven beyond reasonable doubt.
And then we got hacks that can't ever seem to actually present any evidence, just make claims......So we have had Justatruthseeker, the famous astrophysicist, and now we have pat34lee, the eminent Greek and Hebrew scholar.
Not only that, but one peddling the atheist line that we can’t know what the New Testament originally said.
And then we got hacks that can't ever seem to actually present any evidence, just make claims......
You really shouldn’t speak of yourself in that way (even if it is no more than the unvarnished truth).
which is why I rarely bother to even answer any of your posts
Your posts never present anything but claims you can never back up scientifically....
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?