Tree of Life
Hide The Pain
- Feb 15, 2013
- 8,824
- 6,252
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Reformed
- Marital Status
- Married
I think that it’s just humbly acknowledging our limitations in light of an infinite God.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Kind of easy cop out, don't you think?
Your heart must beat really slowly then. The time it would take me to type your single example; let alone 50.That is simply not true.
I can write you horribly designed code, "bad code" by every single rule of the art of coding, yet deliver a working application.
I can also give you a horrible design of cabling in your house, where I take the cable from the modem all the way up to the attic, down again to the cellar, 5x around the house, once accross the street, back to your garden, up to the attic again and then back down to plug it into your pc. HORRIBLE design of cabling. But your pc will work just fine and it will be able to access the internet despite this horrible cabling design.
See? It's not even dificult to come up with such examples. I can give you 50 more in a heartbeat if you want.
Thank you for your response. However, the bones for flippers are not legs. They were never meant to walk. Their body is formed for what they do best, and that is to torpedo, etc. through the water like a missile, amongst other things.
And they do not have "feet" either.
Flippers are flippers.
They just are.
It is what it is.
Still an interesting thread, however.
Thank you.
The more advanced we become, the more apparent it should be that something before us set this system up. Why? Because we will soon be capable of doing the same thing on a computer and when we are, we will do it.
I agree, a flipper is a flipper.
And because the bone structure is the same as in an actual leg and foot does not conclusively rule out a Creator. It just isn't direct evidence for or against creative design by a Creator.
Who was it that brought you computer coding?
I agree, it's not evidence to anyone else, that is exactly what I said. Do we have a communication problem? Repeating what I said doesn't progress your argument.
You can't prove to me that your wife loves you. Only you can know that. Any outside evidence is merely circumstantial, not direct evidence.
Non sequitur.Leg and foot bone structure in a seal flipper is not direct evidence against there being a Creator, anymore than it's direct evidence for a Creator.
True - they always have an out. 'Perfect design!' 'Er, very good design!' 'Er... The Fall!'It's the Fall, dude. It's always the Fall.
If it's good it's evidence of god's perfection, and if it's flawed it was the Fall.
So christianity always win and you better convert.
Great argument..... LOL!
Looks more like begging the question.I think that it’s just humbly acknowledging our limitations in light of an infinite God.
I'm confused. Are you disagreeing with what I'm saying?
With which part? That we will soon be able to make universes within computers, or that we probably aren't the first to be able to do it?Yes.
Perhaps you're also begging the question. Perhaps you're assuming that there is no Creator God and interpreting creation in that light, finding "sloppy design" wherever you look. "Sloppy design" is really a subjective judgment. On what objective basis do you judge that something is sloppy, inefficient, or suboptimal?Looks more like begging the question.
When you have an enzyme that does the opposite of what you want.Perhaps you're also begging the question. Perhaps you're assuming that there is no Creator God and interpreting creation in that light, finding "sloppy design" wherever you look. "Sloppy design" is really a subjective judgment. On what objective basis do you judge that something is sloppy, inefficient, or suboptimal?
With which part? That we will soon be able to make universes within computers, or that we probably aren't the first to be able to do it?
Perhaps you're also begging the question. Perhaps you're assuming that there is no Creator God and interpreting creation in that light, finding "sloppy design" wherever you look. "Sloppy design" is really a subjective judgment. On what objective basis do you judge that something is sloppy, inefficient, or suboptimal?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?