Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Why does Ken Ham think that the Universe is only 6,000 years old?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Not_By_Chance" data-source="post: 68289829" data-attributes="member: 377096"><p>Really? You might question that idea if you watched the two astronomy videos by Spike Psarris (available from <a href="http://www.creationastronomy.com" target="_blank">www.creationastronomy.com</a>), which highlights the masses of problems that exist with the standard cosmology that everyone is being indoctrinated with by the mass media these days (in just the same way that they are being brainwashed to believe that biological [macro] evolution is true, despite any supporting evidence to support it). I can't wait to see his next DVD dealing with problems with the Big Bang theory amongst other things. I believe the Bible is God's word and because it's from God, it doesn't contain errors in it's message, so on that basis, the earth has to be around 6,000 years old and certainly not millions or billions of years.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Not_By_Chance, post: 68289829, member: 377096"] Really? You might question that idea if you watched the two astronomy videos by Spike Psarris (available from [URL="http://www.creationastronomy.com"]www.creationastronomy.com[/URL]), which highlights the masses of problems that exist with the standard cosmology that everyone is being indoctrinated with by the mass media these days (in just the same way that they are being brainwashed to believe that biological [macro] evolution is true, despite any supporting evidence to support it). I can't wait to see his next DVD dealing with problems with the Big Bang theory amongst other things. I believe the Bible is God's word and because it's from God, it doesn't contain errors in it's message, so on that basis, the earth has to be around 6,000 years old and certainly not millions or billions of years. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Why does Ken Ham think that the Universe is only 6,000 years old?
Top
Bottom