Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Why does Ken Ham think that the Universe is only 6,000 years old?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ben West" data-source="post: 68289536" data-attributes="member: 377409"><p>Try again?</p><p></p><p>It's easy Scripturally to show that Evolution is FALSE since Gen 2:4-7 shows that Adam was made on the 3rd Day BEFORE the plants, herbs and trees and long Before ANY other living creature including the common ancestor of Apes, which evolved from the water on the 5th Day. Gen 1:21 Adam was FIRST made. First made's cannot evolve from any other being.</p><p></p><p>It's easy Scientifically since NO one can repeat the combination of magical positive mutations, along with the enormous lengths of time necessary, to change animals into Humans (descendants of Adam). Eliminating inheriting Human intelligence from another Human is Scientifically False. No other Apes have repeated the process.</p><p></p><p>It's easy to show Historically since the following Map shows the arrival of the first Humans on this planet of the sons of God (prehistoric people). Before Noah arrived there was NO Farming, NO city building, NOR any of the traits of modern Humans on this Earth. Arriving only in the last 1% of the time since prehistoric people diverged from Chimps, Humans (descendants of Adam) have taken us to the Moon and Back safely. </p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.fsmitha.com/h1/map00-fc.html" target="_blank">http://www.fsmitha.com/h1/map00-fc.html</a></p><p></p><p>As you should be able to see, Evolution is refuted Scripturally, Scientifically and Historically. By rejecting God's Story of the Flood, the Scoffers of the last days have exposed their False Theory as nothing but smoke. Amen?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ben West, post: 68289536, member: 377409"] Try again? It's easy Scripturally to show that Evolution is FALSE since Gen 2:4-7[B] [/B]shows that Adam was made on the 3rd[B] [/B]Day BEFORE[B] [/B]the plants, herbs and trees and long Before ANY[B] [/B]other living creature including the common ancestor of Apes, which evolved from the water on the 5th[B] [/B]Day. Gen 1:21[B] [/B]Adam was FIRST[B] [/B]made. First made's cannot evolve from any other being. It's easy Scientifically since NO[B] [/B]one can repeat the[B] [/B]combination of magical positive mutations, along with the enormous lengths of time necessary, to change animals into Humans (descendants of Adam). Eliminating inheriting Human intelligence from another[B] [/B]Human is Scientifically False. No[B] [/B]other Apes have repeated the process. It's easy to show Historically since the following Map shows the arrival of the first[B] [/B]Humans on this planet of the sons of God (prehistoric people). Before Noah arrived there was NO[B] [/B]Farming, NO[B] [/B]city building, NOR[B] [/B]any of the traits of modern Humans on this Earth. Arriving only[B] [/B]in the last 1%[B] [/B]of the time since prehistoric people diverged from Chimps, Humans (descendants of Adam) have taken us to the Moon and Back safely. [URL]http://www.fsmitha.com/h1/map00-fc.html[/URL] As you should be able to see, Evolution is refuted Scripturally, Scientifically and Historically. By rejecting God's Story of the Flood, the Scoffers of the last days have exposed their False Theory as nothing but smoke. Amen? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Why does Ken Ham think that the Universe is only 6,000 years old?
Top
Bottom