The research he did is the evidence.A video is not scientific evidence.
Do you believe in loaded questions?Do you think knowledge is something that can be demonstrated?
Do you believe in loaded questions?Some forms of knowledge can be demonstrated. Some cannot.
Do you know that you love your __________(mother and father, wife, brother or sister, kids, etc.)?
But evolution cannot be demonstrated at all. A theory can be proposed that seems to fit the evidence, but without a visual of the act in progress (which we do not now have, nor can it be found in the fossil record) it can't actually be demonstrated.
What forms of knowledge can not be demonstrated, and how do they differ from fiction?
Who cares if you can demonstrate they exist? Prove that Alexander the Great existed. You can't do it. You have word of mouth evidence that he did, but you have more people claiming to have experienced God today than you have historical accounts of Alexander the Great. If you are willing to dismiss the accounts of those living people who have had encounters with God then you must, yep, must, dismiss the lesser evidence of those who are not living who claimed to have been telling the story of Alexander.The difference being that I can demonstrate that those people exist. When people start claiming to love invisible people that no one can demonstrate to exist, it isn't the same thing.
That's just it. You can't fit the evidence to the theory. There is not one intermediate form of any animal that has ever been found. There is not one living today that we can put our peepers on. Show me one example of a dog changing species to a cat, or bird, or anything other than a dog. It has never happened and there is no evidence to show that it has.We can demonstrate that the evidence is consistent with the theory. We are asking you to do the same thing with your claims.
The studies show that there is very little man does to actually add years to the lives of people with disease.
Who cares if you can demonstrate they exist? Prove that Alexander the Great existed. You can't do it. You have word of mouth evidence that he did, but you have more people claiming to have experienced God today than you have historical accounts of Alexander the Great. If you are willing to dismiss the accounts of those living people who have had encounters with God then you must, yep, must, dismiss the lesser evidence of those who are not living who claimed to have been telling the story of Alexander.
Love. You can't demonstrate it.
Who cares if you can demonstrate they exist?
Prove that Alexander the Great existed. You can't do it.
That's just it. You can't fit the evidence to the theory. There is not one intermediate form of any animal that has ever been found.
Show me one example of a dog changing species to a cat, or bird, or anything other than a dog. It has never happened and there is no evidence to show that it has.
There is no need to. Go to youtube and listen to one of the many video that Dr Ornish has on there. I have NOTHING to add to what he is saying. I should just post the link and let people see for themselves first hand because information can only be lost by me repeating what he is saying.If you'd like to have an earnest discussion of the medical research I'd be glad to do that.
There is no need to. Go to youtube and listen to one of the many video that Dr Ornish has on there.
If a dog turned into a cat or a bird, or anything other than a dog, it would DISPROVE evolution.
No No one has a better story - theory. So evolution will be around until someone comes up with something better.Do you understand why a dog turning into a bird would disprove evolution?
You can not disprove evidence. You can only comment on it. They can accept or reject your opinion but the evidence remains evidence for the next person that wants to come along and make up a story about it. This is a game people play. Here is an object lets all make up a story about the object then we will vote on what story we like the best. It's just basic human nature.Don't you find it strange when creationist after creationist demands that evolution be disproven before they will accept it?
No No one has a better story - theory. So evolution will be around until someone comes up with something better.
There is no need to. Go to youtube and listen to one of the many video that Dr Ornish has on there. I have NOTHING to add to what he is saying. I should just post the link and let people see for themselves first hand because information can only be lost by me repeating what he is saying.
If you do not want to follow his program then what program do you feel is better?Ornish's methodology has come under a lot of fire. Even if it were entirely reasonable, it is still very much outdated. His opinion in the public sphere is not the same thing as published, peer-reviewed science papers. In short: I have very little interest in your video link. If you have the original research by him in PubMed, I could take a look at that.
Do you believe in loaded questions?Some forms of knowledge can be demonstrated. Some cannot.
Do you know that you love your __________(mother and father, wife, brother or sister, kids, etc.)? Even if you know it, and can demonstrate it sometimes, you also get angry with them (I'm sorry for the presumption, it's just for the sake of discussion) and demonstrate to the eyes of all the world that you don't love them by what you say about them. You can know it and it can be true, yet there are times where the opposite of the truth is demonstrated.
More objective truths can be demonstrated, usually. But evolution cannot be demonstrated at all. A theory can be proposed that seems to fit the evidence, but without a visual of the act in progress (which we do not now have, nor can it be found in the fossil record) it can't actually be demonstrated.
If you do not want to follow his program then what program do you feel is better?
He recommends diet, exercise and stress control, what do you recommend?
McDonalds, Arbys, and Burger King for longevity?
With a little Taco bell on the side?
The point is they are killing people and science is not blowing the trumpet
to warn people that their life is in danger from eating that food.
If you do not want to follow his program then what program do you feel is better?
He recommends diet, exercise and stress control, what do you recommend?
McDonalds, Arbys, and Burger King for longevity?
With a little Taco bell on the side?
The point is they are killing people and science is not blowing the trumpet
to warn people that their life is in danger from eating that food.
Who cares if you can demonstrate they exist? Prove that Alexander the Great existed. You can't do it. You have word of mouth evidence that he did, but you have more people claiming to have experienced God today than you have historical accounts of Alexander the Great. If you are willing to dismiss the accounts of those living people who have had encounters with God then you must, yep, must, dismiss the lesser evidence of those who are not living who claimed to have been telling the story of Alexander.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?