Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Why does "15 Questions for Evolutionists" brochure confuse the meaning of "evolution?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="verysincere" data-source="post: 61927523" data-attributes="member: 300486"><p>1) But you've simply pushed the question back a step. WHY do you believe Revelation 20:12 refers to the KJV Bible which wouldn't be produced for another 1500+ years???? Also, why do you deviate from the usual interpretation that RV 20:12 refers to the salvation status of people and the WORKS they did in their lifetimes upon which they are judged?</p><p></p><p>2) <strong>More importantly, the King James Bible of 1611 <u>consisted of 80 books, not 66!</u></strong></p><p><strong><u></u></strong></p><p><strong></strong>3) Of course, this illustrates yet again that AV has little actually regard for a LITERAL interpretation of the Bible. Otherwise he would not so casually insert arbitrary imaginations and anachronisms into the Biblical text. Even he knows that no rational person will take him seriously when he insists that English existed as a language many centuries before the forces that molded it. The Latin influence on English came mainly with the Battle of Hastings of 1066 when the Norman Invasion forced French language influences upon the prior Germanic language elements---which in turn came centuries before with the Anglo-Saxon invasion and migrations from Germany! Yet, somehow, of all of the many languages (and language periods) on planet earth, 16th century English is for some strange reason of a special significance of all of them? No, not even AV believes ANY of this nonsense. He's simply mocking the Bible.</p><p><strong> </strong></p><p><strong>.</strong></p><p><strong>My theory remains that AV simply comes up with bizarre claims in order to get attention---and it usually works. (Just like his Noah's ark pine pitch came from New Jersey story.)</strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong>.</strong></p><p><strong></strong></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="verysincere, post: 61927523, member: 300486"] 1) But you've simply pushed the question back a step. WHY do you believe Revelation 20:12 refers to the KJV Bible which wouldn't be produced for another 1500+ years???? Also, why do you deviate from the usual interpretation that RV 20:12 refers to the salvation status of people and the WORKS they did in their lifetimes upon which they are judged? 2) [B]More importantly, the King James Bible of 1611 [U]consisted of 80 books, not 66! [/U] [/B]3) Of course, this illustrates yet again that AV has little actually regard for a LITERAL interpretation of the Bible. Otherwise he would not so casually insert arbitrary imaginations and anachronisms into the Biblical text. Even he knows that no rational person will take him seriously when he insists that English existed as a language many centuries before the forces that molded it. The Latin influence on English came mainly with the Battle of Hastings of 1066 when the Norman Invasion forced French language influences upon the prior Germanic language elements---which in turn came centuries before with the Anglo-Saxon invasion and migrations from Germany! Yet, somehow, of all of the many languages (and language periods) on planet earth, 16th century English is for some strange reason of a special significance of all of them? No, not even AV believes ANY of this nonsense. He's simply mocking the Bible. [B] . My theory remains that AV simply comes up with bizarre claims in order to get attention---and it usually works. (Just like his Noah's ark pine pitch came from New Jersey story.) . [/B] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Why does "15 Questions for Evolutionists" brochure confuse the meaning of "evolution?
Top
Bottom