• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Boxmaker

Senior Member
Dec 28, 2006
596
9
Arvada, CO
✟23,292.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Why wouldn't He, Box?
Why would He? God did not create us to be robots carrying out a pre-assigned set of instructions. He created us to be with Him and to love Him because we want to, not because we have to. Man is not pond scum to God. God became Christ and died for our sins to redeem us to Him. Humans are the only ones He did that for. Granted, humans are the only ones who need redemption, but He didn't have to do it. He could have let the flood wipe out everything and sarted over. He didn't. Why?
 
Upvote 0

bradfordl

Veteran
Mar 20, 2006
1,510
181
✟25,108.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
Why would He?
Is this scripture true?:
Proverbs 16:33 The lot is cast into the lap, But its every decision is from the LORD.
If it is, and assume you believe it is, and if God bothers to decide every small thing as a cast of lots, if man devises his way but God directs his steps, why would He leave such important things as the thoughts of men to some random chance?
God did not create us to be robots carrying out a pre-assigned set of instructions.
Who said you had pre-assigned instructions? Do you? I don't. All things are ordained of God, but we mere humans don't get to see the plan, we must "devise our ways", which is why we are responsible, but "God directs our steps", which is obvious preordination. Your problem is that you just don't want to believe scripture, and instead prefer to hold to your own (or your apostate teachers') version of things. How is that any different from a pagan?
Man is not pond scum to God.
Well, we may not (always) smell as bad, but I don't see where He is sending any pond scum to hell, so that might not be such a thing to boast about.
God became Christ and died for our sins to redeem us to Him. Humans are the only ones He did that for.
Your error is thinking He did it for us foremost. He did it for His glory above any other motivation.
Granted, humans are the only ones who need redemption, but He didn't have to do it. He could have let the flood wipe out everything and sarted over. He didn't. Why?
FOR HIS GLORY! Not because of anything worth saving in man. Your favorite verses:
 
Upvote 0

GodsElect

Regular Member
Nov 26, 2006
261
17
✟22,992.00
Faith
Presbyterian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution


So Boxmaker, Do you want to go to Hawaii tomorrow?....
Oh and I need you to buy me a plane ticket too so you can take me...

...whats that?

Your not gonna take me to Hawaii?

OH! that's right your not FREE to take a trip tomorrow, nor buy me a plane ticket.

So much for that potent free will!

Better yet let's just FREE WILL ourselves some wings on our backs so we can just fly for free to Hawaii.

....uh, DARN nothin happened! I thought I was free to choose some wings on my back!

Well I guess my will is not so FREE!
 
Upvote 0

Boxmaker

Senior Member
Dec 28, 2006
596
9
Arvada, CO
✟23,292.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Why do you insist on making free will out to be something entirely alien to what it is? Our choices are not infinite, we can only choose between what is available to us.

I could choose to take my family to Hawaii tomorrow. We could take you too (don't count on it though) but it is not practical for us right now. We have chosen to use that money to remodel the kitchen.

I cannot choose to grow wings for any reason so it is not an issue of will.

Free will is the ability to choose from what is available to use. Chocolate or vanilla. Kitchen or Hawaii. Chinese or Mediterranean. God or hell.
 
Upvote 0

UMP

Well-Known Member
Aug 16, 2004
5,022
116
✟5,772.00
Faith
Christian

Concerning the nature and the power of fallen man s will, the greatest confusion prevails today, and the most erroneous views are held, even by many of God’s children. The popular idea now prevailing, and which is taught from the great majority of pulpits, is that man has a "free will", and that salvation comes to the sinner through his will co-operating with the Holy Spirit. To deny the "free will" of man, i.e. his power to choose that which is good, his native ability to accept Christ, is to bring one into disfavor at once, even before most of those who profess to be orthodox. And yet Scripture emphatically says, "It is not of him that willeth, nor of him that runneth, but of God that showeth mercy" (Rom. 9:16). Which shall we believe: God, or the preachers?
But some one may reply, Did not Joshua say to Israel, "Choose you this day whom ye will serve"? Yes, he did; but why not complete his sentence?—"whether the gods that your fathers served which were on the other side of the flood, or the gods of the Amorites, in whose land ye dwell" (Josh. 24:15)! But why attempt to pit scripture against scripture? The Word of God never contradicts itself, and the Word expressly declares, "There is none that seeketh after God" (Rom. 3:11). Did not Christ say to the men of His day, "Ye will not come to Me, that ye might have life" (John 5:40)? Yes, but some did "come" to Him, some did receive Him. True and who were they? John 1:12, 13 tells us; "But as many as received Him, to them gave He power to become the sons of God, to them that believe on His name: which were born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God"!
But does not Scripture say, "Whosoever will may come"? It does, but does this signify that everybody has the will to come? What of those who won’t come? "Whosoever will may come" no more implies that fallen man has the power (in himself) to come, than "Stretch forth thine hand" implied that the man with the withered arm had ability (in himself) to comply. In and of himself the natural man has power to reject Christ; but in and of himself he has not the power to receive Christ. And why? Because he has a mind that is "enmity against" Him (Rom. 8:7); because he has a heart that hates Him (John 15:18). Man chooses that which is according to his nature, and therefore before he will ever choose or prefer that which is divine and spiritual, a new nature must be imparted to him; in other words, he must be born again.
Should it be asked, But does not the Holy Spirit overcome a man’s enmity and hatred when He convicts the sinner of his sins and his need of Christ; and does not the Spirit of God produce such conviction in many that perish? Such language betrays confusion of thought: were such a man’s enmity really "overcome", then he would readily turn to Christ; that he does not come to the Saviour, demonstrates that his enmity is not overcome. But that many are, through the preaching of the Word, convicted by the Holy Spirit, who nevertheless die in unbelief, is solemnly true. Yet, it is a fact which must not be lost sight of that, the Holy Spirit does something more in each of God’s elect than He does in the non-elect: He works in them "both to will and to do of God’s good pleasure" (Phil. 2:13).
In reply to what we have said above, Arminians would answer, No; the Spirit’s work of conviction is the same both in the converted and in the unconverted, that which distinguishes the one class from the other is that the former yielded to His strivings, whereas the latter resist them. But if this were the case, then the Christian would make himself to "differ", whereas the Scripture attributes the "differing" to God’s discriminating grace (1 Cor. 4:7). Again; if such were the case, then the Christian would have ground for boasting and self-glorying over his cooperation with the Spirit; but this would flatly contradict Ephesians 2:8, "For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God".

A.W. Pink
http://www.pbministries.org/books/pink/Sovereignty/sov_07.htm
 
Upvote 0

UMP

Well-Known Member
Aug 16, 2004
5,022
116
✟5,772.00
Faith
Christian

There is one small problem with your premise. Man's will is in bondage.

"The carnal mind is enmity against God; for it is not subject to the law of God, neither indeed can be." Romans 8:7
[SIZE=+2]M[/SIZE]an, created in God’s image, possesses a mind, a heart, and a will. The mind, or intellect, allows him to think rationally, not by sheer instinct like an animal. The heart, or emotion, enables him to feel, unlike a robot or machine, human experience. The will, or volition, enables him to make decisions and choices that have moral consequences. It is his capacity for action, a capacity that allows him to choose this over that and those instead of these.

[SIZE=+2]I[/SIZE]n his unfallen state, man was good and very good. The fall, however, affected every part of man’s being. Man’s mind, by virtue of his fallen nature was darkened, incapable of understanding the things of the Spirit of God (Ephesians 4:18; 1 Corinthians 2:14). Further, his emotions are now deceptive and untrustworthy (Jeremiah 17:9) and his will, that is, his ability to choose good over evil and right over wrong, is bound. The 1689 Baptist Confession of Faith reads,

"Man, by his fall into a state of sin, hath wholly lost all ability of will to any spiritual good accompanying salvation, so as a natural man, being altogether averse from that good, and dead in sin, is not able by his own strength to commit himself, or to prepare himself thereto."
[SIZE=+2]
S
[/SIZE]
o, is man free? If by the word "free" one means that people have the ability to make certain choices on their own (i.e. free from compulsion, force, or coercion), then the answer is "yes." For example, people have the ability to choose to go to the store or stay home, to buy a newspaper or not, to eat beef or to eat fish, etc.; such choices are within the natural capacity of human beings. People are free to act according to their nature.

If by the word "free", however, one means free without any limitation, then the answer is "no." People are not free to act contrary to their nature. I cannot choose to fly. Yes, I can choose to travel by airplane, but I cannot choose to sprout wings or become a bird. My will, you see, is not entirely free. It is bound by the limits of my nature. We do not have the freedom to be anything we are not.

Man, in other words, is not free to act outside the boundaries of his human nature. He cannot live the life of a fish in the ocean or fly like a bird in the air without external resources enabling him to duplicate his natural environment. Just as that is true on a natural level, it is also true on a spiritual level. In his fallen state, man cannot choose to be righteous. The Ethiopian cannot by his own sheer willpower, change the color of his skin, nor the leopard his spots. Neither can those whose nature is depraved voluntarily do good (Jeremiah 13:23). Man’s will is enslaved to his sinful nature. Left to himself, his only capacity is fleshly.

Unregenerate people are not free to choose righteousness or wickedness; they are, on the contrary, "free from righteousness" (Romans 6:20). By nature, man’s will is a "will not" (Psalm 10:4; Psalm 58:3; John 5:40, Isaiah 26:10). His only inclination is toward carnality. The natural man will never choose anything but sin, because he cannot operate outside the parameters of his sinful nature (Romans 8:7). The nature of man’s will is not free.

Not until his nature is changed does he have the desire or the capacity to choose righteousness. Prior to God’s work of regeneration in the soul, therefore, man’s will is bound by the old nature. In regeneration, the fallen sinner is made "willing in the day of God’s power" (Psalm 110:3). He is given a new nature, a righteous nature, capable of responding to God. Because the old nature is not eradicated, however, a warfare between the Spirit and the flesh ensues (Romans 7) - requiring deliberate and decisive efforts of the will for righteousness (Romans 6:11-23). In other words, the believer must choose, every day, between the options of serving sin or righteousness (Joshua 24:15; Romans 6:13). With such a conflict facing us, we should be glad that the Holy Spirit will continue to work within us "both to will and to do His good pleasure" (Philippians 2:13).

Because man’s will, apart from the new nature given in the new birth, is bound, it is incapable of choosing eternal life. Man’s only hope of eternal life, then, is rooted in God’s initiative and choice. Salvation, in other words, depends on God’s choice, not mine, and upon His sovereign will, not man’s fallen will (John 1:13; Romans 9:16; Ephesians 1:5,11; Hebrews 10:10). That, my friend, is a firm foundation!

Michael Gowens
 
Upvote 0

Boxmaker

Senior Member
Dec 28, 2006
596
9
Arvada, CO
✟23,292.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
That is one of the best descriptions of free will I have had the pleasure to read. Mr. Gownes is far more eloquent than I in voicing what I believe free will is and is not.
 
Upvote 0

GodsElect

Regular Member
Nov 26, 2006
261
17
✟22,992.00
Faith
Presbyterian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
Free will is the ability to choose from what is available to use. Chocolate or vanilla. Kitchen or Hawaii. Chinese or Mediterranean. God or hell.

No actually what you are discribing is NOT FREE WILL!

Free will is FREE FROM ANY INFLUENCE either internal or external.

But such is not the case with the choices that you have described above.

1. You cannot choose which ice cream you want contrary to your own thoughts about chocolate and vanilla.

If you love chocolate and hate vanilla. You would always choose chocolate over vanilla. So were your free from your internal influence telling you to choose chocolate over vanilla. The answer is NO. You chose chocolate because it is burned into your head that you hate vanilla and would never choose vanilla. Thus your will is in bondage to the internal forces that work within you and not free from anything at all.

2. You cannot choose to go to Hawaii or instead get your Kitchen remodeled outside of the internal and external forces limiting you.

First, let me show you again what the question was

So Boxmaker, Do you want to go to Hawaii tomorrow?....

The question was, if you would be willing to go to Hawaii and pay for my ticket too TOMORROW! Which is today and I still don't have that plane ticket yet. Now why is it that we aren't going to Hawaii TODAY?

Well first, you are not free to just up and leave your job, family, other plans you had scheduled, ect... Your will cannot act outside of the external forces that keep you right where you are this moment. You could not go to Hawaii today because you must have the money to remodel you kitchen, right? I believe you said so yourself...

Boxmaker said... "but it is not practical for us right now. We have chosen to use that money to remodel the kitchen."

So were you free from the influence of your wife, that would beat you over the head with a pan if you spent the money for the kitchen
remodel on something like a trip for you and you good ol' buddy Godselect?

And were you free to take me outside of your internal influence? you said...

Boxmaker said..."We could take you too (don't count on it though)"

So, you were NOT free to take that trip and NOT free to buy my a plane ticket because of all of the outside and internal influences. And that is not free will at all! Your will is in bondage to whatever influences it the most.

Your heart's desire gives the mind a will to do something. If it is not your hearts desire to choose vanilla, you will NEVER choose vanilla unless you are persuaded by an external force that speaks your heart and becomes an internal force to tell the mind to CHOOSE vanilla. Unless that external force makes change your mind, you will ALWAYS choose chocolate! So are you really free to choose anything other? The plain answer is NO.

Thus is the same with coming to the Lord. If we are born dead in trespasses and sin. If we are not willing to choose God. If we were born by nature children of wrath. If no man seeks after God. If we were once at emnity with God. We weren't FREE to do anything but to do what was contrary to our NATURE. We were born enemies of God and it was our nature to REJECT God and live lives of utter depravity apart from God.

Only until that outside influence (the Holy Spirit) came into your heart and changed it first, and became the internal influence, you would have NEVER came to God! Your nature was always to reject Him! Your WILL WAS IN BONDAGE TO ITS NATURE OF WRATH!

So is your will really free at all? Free from all influences? Independent of any work of the Holy Spirit before you came to Christ?

This is how Jesus explains that outside influence that comes to ALL those who truly believe in Him.

John 6:29 Jesus answered and said to them, “This is the work of God, that you believe in Him whom He sent.”

He doesn't say "This is the work of your free will, that you believe in Him whom He sent."

John 6:44 No one can come to Me unless the Father who sent Me draws him; and I will raise him up at the last day.

So does man have the will to stop God from drawing him?
No man does Boxmaker. That would make God out to be a weakling!

You were made willing, if you are, by the power of God the Holy Spirit ALONE. The one and only perfect internal influence of the will.

I pray that this may help you to understand who's will really counts for anything.
 
Upvote 0

Boxmaker

Senior Member
Dec 28, 2006
596
9
Arvada, CO
✟23,292.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
I am free to choose between vanilla and chocolate. I prefer vanilla but there are days when I want chocolate. I would almost never choose strawberry. I can choose chocolate, vanilla or nothing. My choice is influanced by many things but the final choice is mine. I am free to choose from what is available to me.

In point of fact, I am free to leave my family and work and take you to Hawaii. If I am willing to accept the consequences, I can do those things. I am not. I value my family and like (and need) my job. So while I am free to choose to go to Hawaii, I choose not to go. You'll have to find somebody else to buy you your ticket.



Again, I am free to make that choice if I am willing to accept the consequences of that choice. I have never said our will is unlimited. It is limited to what is available to us. Part of walking with Christ is to treat my wife, and family, as Christ treated His church. I try to do that and put their needs ahead of my own.

 
Upvote 0

UMP

Well-Known Member
Aug 16, 2004
5,022
116
✟5,772.00
Faith
Christian
That is one of the best descriptions of free will I have had the pleasure to read. Mr. Gownes is far more eloquent than I in voicing what I believe free will is and is not.

Did you read the entire quote? If so, the paragraph you are now agreeing with below is completely apposed to your previous statement in which you said (""FREE WILL is the ability to choose from what is available to use. Chocolate or vanilla. Kitchen or Hawaii. Chinese or Mediterranean. GOD OR HELL""). We all agree on the Chocolate or vanilla, Chinese or Mediterranean but not as you said "God or Hell". Mans unregenerate will is in bondage, a slave to sin.

"Unregenerate people are not free to choose righteousness or wickedness; they are, on the contrary, "free from righteousness" (Romans 6:20). By nature, man’s will is a "will not" (Psalm 10:4; Psalm 58:3; John 5:40, Isaiah 26:10). His only inclination is toward carnality. The natural man will never choose anything but sin, because he cannot operate outside the parameters of his sinful nature (Romans 8:7). The nature of man’s will is not free."

Michael Gowens.
 
Upvote 0

Boxmaker

Senior Member
Dec 28, 2006
596
9
Arvada, CO
✟23,292.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
God works in your heart. People can accept His gift of salvation or reject that gift. I believe that God ordained that we would have to make that choice.
 
Upvote 0

UMP

Well-Known Member
Aug 16, 2004
5,022
116
✟5,772.00
Faith
Christian
Not what, who. God/Jesus/Holy Spirit

You said this: "God works in your heart. People can accept His gift of salvation or reject that gift. I believe that God ordained that we would have to make that choice."

According to your above statement, if Bob is saved and Jim is not, it's because Bob accepted and Jim rejected.
Yes or No?
 
Upvote 0

Boxmaker

Senior Member
Dec 28, 2006
596
9
Arvada, CO
✟23,292.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Jim rejected Him.
 
Upvote 0

UMP

Well-Known Member
Aug 16, 2004
5,022
116
✟5,772.00
Faith
Christian
Jim rejected Him.

Going back to my original question. "If Bob is saved and Jim is not, what has made the difference?"

According to your above answer in post # 656 the difference is Bob's and Jim's choice or will.

According to your answer in post # 654 it is God\Jesus\Holy Spirit.

Which is it?
 
Reactions: xapis
Upvote 0

Boxmaker

Senior Member
Dec 28, 2006
596
9
Arvada, CO
✟23,292.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
God initiates we respond. God starts it so without out God, there is nothing. Jim and Bob both respond to God, one for God, one against. The difference is one surrendered into God's plan for salvation and the other rejected it. This the fundemental diference between Calvinism and Open theologies: Under Calvinism there is no choice, you either saved or damned by God's choice. Under open theology you are saved or damned by your own choice. Please note that God makes that choice possible. WIthout God there is no choice, only a lake of fire.

God worked in my heart and I responded. I chose God's will for my life. That having been said, my salvation is in Jesus, not in anything that I did. He loved me first and I love Him in return.

My neighbor has not. They have been sudeced by the wisdom of man and fallen into a feel good spirit church. You know the type, if your nice to everybody you go to heaven kind of theology.

What is the difference between me an them? It is God. Whether God gave me a heart that would respond to Him and did not do so for them, I don't know. All I know is that without od there is no salvation possible. Whatever the difference between me and them, it lies with God.
 
Upvote 0

UMP

Well-Known Member
Aug 16, 2004
5,022
116
✟5,772.00
Faith
Christian
God initiates we respond. God starts it so without out God, there is nothing. Jim and Bob both respond to God, one for God, one against. The difference is one surrendered into God's plan for salvation and the other rejected it.

Therefore, Bob would have room to boast and that is diametrically apposed to the word of God.

Ephesians 2:
[8] For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God:
[9] Not of works, lest any man should boast.

Romans 9:
[16] So then it is not of him that willeth, nor of him that runneth, but of God that sheweth mercy.
 
Upvote 0

UMP

Well-Known Member
Aug 16, 2004
5,022
116
✟5,772.00
Faith
Christian
What is the difference between me an them? It is God.

If this be the case, you MUST concede that God has done more for you than your neighbors!

Whether God gave me a heart that would respond to Him and did not do so for them, I don't know.

It seems that He has (is my hope for you)....and God has EVERY RIGHT to do so!!
 
Upvote 0