Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
You said nonei dont consid
#1 occassionally is not definite
#2 there is no such thing as always and never.
#3 99.9% of animals with horns are herbivores
#4 99.9% is a definite doomsday threshold limit
#5 my points are very correct
This is half a sentence. What are you trying to say?i dont consid
Chameleons do not OCCASIONALLY eat other animals. They ALWAYS eat other animal;s. Their diet consists entirely of eating other animals. They are predators.#1 occassionally is not definite
That wasn't your claim. You said there ARE NO HORNED PREDATORS. I showed you a horned predator, therefore your claim is wrong.#2 there is no such thing as always and never.
So what? That wasn't your claim. You said there ARE NO HORNED PREDATORS. I showed you a horned predator, therefore your claim is wrong.#3 99.9% of animals with horns are herbivores
This has nothing to do with your claim.#4 99.9% is a definite doomsday threshold limit
You said there ARE NO HORNED PREDATORS. I showed you a horned predator, therefore your claim is wrong.#5 my points are very correct
This is half a sentence. What are you trying to say?
Chameleons do not OCCASIONALLY eat other animals. They ALWAYS eat other animal;s. Their diet consists entirely of eating other animals. They are predators.
That wasn't your claim. You said there ARE NO HORNED PREDATORS. I showed you a horned predator, therefore your claim is wrong.
So what? That wasn't your claim. You said there ARE NO HORNED PREDATORS. I showed you a horned predator, therefore your claim is wrong.
This has nothing to do with your claim.
You said there ARE NO HORNED PREDATORS. I showed you a horned predator, therefore your claim is wrong.
Once again, ALL Jackson's Chameleons have horns and they are ALL predators.an occassional horn on a jackal does not count
this is clearly a mutation as is with the giant and mini lizards.
so again no predators have horns...
refer to point #2 again if still confused
Once again, ALL Jackson's Chameleons have horns and they are ALL predators.
ALL Carnotaurs had horns and they were ALL predators.
yes severly mutated ones.. again doom was nigh..Once again, ALL Jackson's Chameleons have horns and they are ALL predators.
ALL Carnotaurs had horns and they were ALL predators.
So ALL of those chameleons are severely mutated. All of them. In exactly the same way.yes severly mutated ones.. again doom was nigh..
it is not by design... that predators have horns ; as says the 99.9998% probability.
what dont you get?
they dont exactly look right do they...So ALL of those chameleons are severely mutated. All of them. In exactly the same way.
You might as well say that all humans having two legs is a mutation.
Bad news for you evolutionists:You don't get to decide that something doesn't count just because you think it looks weird.
Yeah, it is. It has a tongue that pistons out to adhere to prey. Which it then eats. Making it a carnivorous predator.a chameleon is not a predator
Wow. You didn't understand the point of that at all, did you? Those dinosaurs still actually existed you know. What is this idea you have that the name has some influence over it? That if we call it something different it actually becomes something different? It's still the same animal.Bad news for you evolutionists:
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?