Why did Adam and Eve sin if there was no sin?

DM25

Well-Known Member
Jul 10, 2018
682
322
33
Edmonton
✟16,988.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Wrong. You are using ESV which is corrupted. KJV literally says "Can't sin" not continue in sin... See how these corrupted versions twist things around? KJV is saying you CAN'T sin, your new spirit is sinless, it can't sin. That's what lives on for eternity.

"and he cannot sin, because he is born of God."
 
Upvote 0

bling

Regular Member
Site Supporter
Feb 27, 2008
16,184
1,809
✟826,126.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
The agnostics thought man could be separated into the Spiritual and the flesh, which led to the flesh doing its thing which did not impact the spirit of the person.

You seem to be saying something similar: my spiritual self does not sin only my fleshly self is sinning?

Why are there warnings given Christians against sinning?

Is sin a problem for Christians at all?
 
Upvote 0

DM25

Well-Known Member
Jul 10, 2018
682
322
33
Edmonton
✟16,988.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
No I'm not saying it's ok to keep sinning. I am just trying to show the difference between the flesh and the spirit. The spirit is your new man, and God calls us to forsake the flesh and crucify the flesh and live out the new man. But your flesh hasn't been perfected... Your spirit has been perfected as it says in 1 John, one born of God can't sin, when you receive a new spirit it's impossible. However our flesh can still give into flesh sometimes, we all stumble, but our flesh doesn't go to heaven, it dies. Our spirit goes to heaven, and then our spirit will receive a new glorified body which will be sinless too.

God sees us in our new spirit. In him he doesn't see us as sinners anymore as we have no sin. Our spirit cannot sin, it's impossible, it is perfected. It's just our rotten flesh that can sometimes sin, and so we still have sin as we our in our flesh. We don't have new glorified bodies yet. In heaven this will not be the case. We will have perfected bodies, with no sin at all.
 
Upvote 0

ewq1938

I love you three.
Christian Forums Staff
Administrator
Site Supporter
Nov 5, 2011
44,419
6,800
✟916,702.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
"where there is no law there is no transgression"



"where there is no law there is no transgression"


That doesn't change that sin existed before Adam and Eve.
 
Upvote 0

PROPHECYKID

Veteran
Site Supporter
Oct 28, 2007
5,982
528
35
The isle of spice
Visit site
✟73,684.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Well why did the devil sin when there was no sin.
 
Upvote 0

bling

Regular Member
Site Supporter
Feb 27, 2008
16,184
1,809
✟826,126.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Here is the problem:

You can redefine “we” from including “you” body, soul, mind and spirit to just being “spirit” or you can redefine “sin” to be not any and all sins to being only repetitive or unrepented of sins (you can still sinner, but since they are washed away immediately you are not a sinner.

Why would it be significant to have this hidden sinless spirit dwelling within you and yet not able to control your earthly body?

Are we just “denying” we are sinning when we sin, because this enter un-seeable inter self (spiritual self) is not sinning? This would help us feel better about ourselves, but should we and how does this help others?

Does scripture point to all “Christians” who sinned and say they were never Christians?
 
Upvote 0

WebersHome

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
May 7, 2017
2,140
460
Oregon
✟368,343.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
.
KJV is saying you CAN'T sin, your new spirit is sinless, it can't sin.

I'm not a koiné Greek scholar, but I've been a Bible student long enough to know that it isn't always possible to translate one language into another language word for word, and grammar for grammar, because of ambiguity; defined by Webster's as a word or expression that can be understood in two or more possible ways.

The KJV was the best that English translators could do with the scholarship available to them four hundred years ago, but even then it was an arbitrary, man-made translation; God didn't do it any more than He's done the NIV, the NASV, the Catholic, or any other English translation for that matter. And besides, the language and grammar of the KJV is obsolete and should never be thought of as a gold standard, so to speak.

Anyway, the KJV's version of 1John 3:9 doesn't fit the context of that third chapter. The translation below is much better suited.

"No one who is born of God will continue to sin, because God's seed remains in him; he cannot go on sinning, because he has been born of God." (NIV)

In other words; it's only a matter of time before a born-again Christian begins to think seriously about reform. It's inevitable due to the promise below.

"I will give you a new heart and put a new spirit in you; I will remove from you your heart of stone and give you a heart of flesh. And I will put My spirit in you and move you to follow My decrees and be careful to keep My laws." (Ezek 36:26-27)
_
 
Reactions: JohnRabbit
Upvote 0

JohnRabbit

just trying to understand
Site Supporter
Feb 12, 2009
4,383
320
i am in alabama
✟55,288.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
how is esv corrupted?
 
Upvote 0

Jonaitis

Soli Deo Gloria
Jan 4, 2019
5,225
4,212
Wyoming
✟123,651.00
Country
United States
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Libertarian
Why did Adam and Eve sin if there was no sin?

Well, they were in a state of innocence, not perfection, there is a difference. Second, temptation was the factor that changed the situation. It is not a sin to be tempted, for Jesus himself was tempted by Satan. It is falling into the temptation that it becomes sin. They were in a state of purity and innocence, but through temptation they were easily drawn to fall.

I believe inexperience and unfamiliarity to facing temptation was part of Eve's weakness, as well as knowing/actively engaging it with a resolution to be obedient was lacking.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Gottservant

God loves your words, may men love them also
Site Supporter
Aug 3, 2006
11,380
704
45
✟276,687.00
Faith
Messianic
Well, they were in a state of innocence, not perfection, there is a difference.

Great answer!

I was going to say Eve merely started to sin, it was not yet iniquity (that is "beyond control") - so it was sin that didn't lead to death (as some sins do not).

Remember, Jesus said "it is not what goes into the mouth defiles a man, but that which comes out of a man defiles a man" - so without espousing sin, as a result of eating the forbidden fruit, there is just the death (of having sinned, not the death of having sinned to death) - in other words it is a death that can be resurrected, not a death that cannot be resurrected.

As Jesus demonstrates, sin that is not sin to death, can be resurrected.
 
Upvote 0

AntiVillain

Active Member
Jul 20, 2014
160
49
✟151,055.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Republican
We will not have the free will to sin in heaven, plain and simple. And thank God for that. The devil, evil, and sin will all be wiped away. We will not know what sin is. Our memories of sin will be wiped away.
I.e., robots.
 
Upvote 0