Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Why Bother? A scientific Critique of Evolution
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="chickenman" data-source="post: 214665" data-attributes="member: 2570"><p>an article that calls into question spetner's objections to the use of immune system mutations as evidence for evolution : </p><p></p><p>Evolution of high mutation rates in experimental populations of E. coli</p><p></p><p>Paul D. Sniegowski, Philip J. Gerrish, Richard E. Lenski</p><p>SUMMARY: Most mutations are likely to be deleterious, and so the spontaneous mutation rate is generally held at a very low value. Nonetheless, evolutionary theory...</p><p></p><p>Nature387, 703 - 705 (12 Jun 1997) DOI: 10.1038/42701 Letters to Nature</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="chickenman, post: 214665, member: 2570"] an article that calls into question spetner's objections to the use of immune system mutations as evidence for evolution : Evolution of high mutation rates in experimental populations of E. coli Paul D. Sniegowski, Philip J. Gerrish, Richard E. Lenski SUMMARY: Most mutations are likely to be deleterious, and so the spontaneous mutation rate is generally held at a very low value. Nonetheless, evolutionary theory... Nature387, 703 - 705 (12 Jun 1997) DOI: 10.1038/42701 Letters to Nature [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Why Bother? A scientific Critique of Evolution
Top
Bottom