Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Why Bother? A scientific Critique of Evolution
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="chickenman" data-source="post: 214649" data-attributes="member: 2570"><p>The genetic changes that could illustrate the theory must not only add information to the bacteriums genome, they must add new information to the biocosm. The horizontal transfer of genes only spreads around genes that are already in some species.</p><p></p><p>- this statement is so illogical it makes my head hurt. Antibiotic resistance to man-made chemicals which are not found in the natural environment of a bacteria is new genetic information. Horizontal transfer of this newly evolved gene spreads the gene throughout the "biocosm". The newly added genetic information spreads throughout the "biocosm" through horizontal gene transfer. He has just lost his argument. Not that its all that compelling. His basic argument is that we haven't observed "Evolution A" (despite numerous speciation events which suggest the contrary) therefore it can't happen because it seems really improbable. Despite the fact that the evidence in the genomes showed that it HAS HAPPENED.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="chickenman, post: 214649, member: 2570"] The genetic changes that could illustrate the theory must not only add information to the bacteriums genome, they must add new information to the biocosm. The horizontal transfer of genes only spreads around genes that are already in some species. - this statement is so illogical it makes my head hurt. Antibiotic resistance to man-made chemicals which are not found in the natural environment of a bacteria is new genetic information. Horizontal transfer of this newly evolved gene spreads the gene throughout the "biocosm". The newly added genetic information spreads throughout the "biocosm" through horizontal gene transfer. He has just lost his argument. Not that its all that compelling. His basic argument is that we haven't observed "Evolution A" (despite numerous speciation events which suggest the contrary) therefore it can't happen because it seems really improbable. Despite the fact that the evidence in the genomes showed that it HAS HAPPENED. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Why Bother? A scientific Critique of Evolution
Top
Bottom