• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Status
Not open for further replies.

RealityCheck

Senior Veteran
May 9, 2006
5,924
488
New York
✟31,038.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married


And if God is not omnipotent, there's no reason to worship that God. If God's power is finite, then there easily could be another more powerful being that we should be worshipping instead. And another more powerful than that. All the way until you get to, again, the final, omnipotent, infinitely powerful GOD, and then... well that GOD could just eliminate all undesired religions without needing humans to do it.
 
Upvote 0

Lanakila

Not responsible for the changes here.
Jun 12, 2002
8,454
222
60
Nestled in the Gorgeous Montana Mountains
Visit site
✟32,973.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others

The type of Christian I once was believed in individual soul liberty. Meaning you can't force someone to believe as you do. I can't believe someone calling themselves a Christian thinks it's right to force everyone to believe as they do.
 
Upvote 0

DLaurier

Active Member
Jan 20, 2007
84
5
✟22,721.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
CA-Others
When I was a christian, We had a pastor who was a hatefull, biggoted, authoritarian, bully. And I incured his wrath and venom by being Metis instead of Anglo/saxon.

But there was another pastor who stood up to him.
The other pastor had to protect me from direct physical violence by the main pastor and his more devoted personal followers.

Certainly there are criminals and monsters among the christian flocks. But there are also noble and heroic people in those flocks.
We need those heroic people, to uphold the survival of the species.
 
Upvote 0

Robbie_James_Francis

May all beings have happiness and its causes
Apr 12, 2005
9,317
661
36
England, UK
✟35,261.00
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Single
Hmm... here I am, a Fundamentalist, reading this unprovoked attack.
Just who was spreading intolerance and persecution again?

By 'fundamentalist' I meant someone of any religion (or indeed none) that did not want to accept a free society in which freedom of belief and conscience are basic and inviolable rights. Someone who actively went about trying to destroy such a society, and build a diametrically opposed one. Any attack against those that I would define as fundamentalists would not, in my opinion, be unprovoked. Rather it is provoked by their original attack on the basis of civilised society.

peace
 
Reactions: christalee4
Upvote 0

crazyfingers

Well-Known Member
May 17, 2002
8,733
329
Massachusetts
Visit site
✟33,923.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
According to scripture it is clear that God does not want religious diversity, and he certainly does not want secularism.

“Render unto Caesar the things which are Caesar’s, and unto God the things that are God’s” smacks of secularism, or at least separation of church and state to me.

What I'd like to know from the other members is why (if you are) you are friendly to people like atheists for example knowing that they want to completely eliminate our faith and drive God from the world.

I have no desire to eliminate Christianity. I simply demand that it not be imposed upon me.

I'm friendly to my Christian wife because I love her. She's friendly to me because she loves me.

However it certainly sounds like you think that atheism should be eliminated or done-to in some way.

What, exactly, do you suggest be done about... me... for example?
 
Upvote 0

elsbeth

Out of my mind...back in 5 Minutes.
Oct 26, 2006
922
68
AZ
Visit site
✟23,929.00
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
You need to go back and re-read the gospels. Jesus was very tolerant. Tolerance doesn't mean accepting that what we consider wrong beliefs are right, it means accepting that people have the right to believe what they choose, and that we are still commanded to love them. Read the story of the Good Samaritan, and read about the Samaritans and the Jews.
 
Upvote 0

ChristianCenturion

Veteran / Tuebor
Feb 9, 2005
14,207
576
In front of a computer
✟40,488.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican

I find your use of Fundamentalist misapplied then.
Wouldn't your description there be better fitting Dictatorship or Aristocracy?

Or are the recent batch of postings (not just yours) only addressing Fundamentalism simply trying to redefine the term, overlooking the distinction between destruction and opposition, and committing self-contradiction in the process?
 
Upvote 0

Blackguard_

Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos.
Feb 9, 2004
9,468
374
42
Tucson
✟26,492.00
Faith
Lutheran
Robbie Francis said:
I take it you mean born into a Christian family and not actually born a Christian. No-one is born a Christian, Muslim or whatever, just as no-one is born a Marxist or a Utilitarian.

I meant "actually born a Christian". It was a rhetorical question, the point being how is attitude of intolerence towards non-believers doesn't jive with his once being a non-beleiver. That is, if we're supposed to be intolerant of non-beleivers, why did someone tolerate/be friendly with him to teach/preach to?
 
Upvote 0

christalee4

Senior Veteran
Apr 11, 2005
3,252
323
✟5,083.00
Faith
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat

Unfortunately, much of fundamentalism now and throughout history, has and currently seeks to destroy, not just oppose, their enemies, presumably in the name of God.

The way they see it, is a dispensation of justice for God, even it means minimizing, and ultimately destroying those who oppose their aims. For if the very existence of those who refuse to convert or submit to the imposed laws of God is itself disobedience, then disobedience must be crushed.

http://www.serve.com/thibodep/cr/cultman.htm

http://www.serve.com/thibodep/cr/liberty.htm

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamic_fundamentalism

http://www.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/europe/01/17/warwithin.amanpour/index.html

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A38308-2005Apr8.html

Joseph Stalin: "Death solves all problems: no man, no problem."
 
Upvote 0
C

Cerberus~

Guest

Because we outnumber you 2 to 1. Always remember that.
 
Upvote 0

Robbie_James_Francis

May all beings have happiness and its causes
Apr 12, 2005
9,317
661
36
England, UK
✟35,261.00
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Single
Fundamentalism: A usually religious movement or point of view characterized by a return to fundamental principles, by rigid adherence to those principles, and often by intolerance of other views and opposition to secularism.

peace
 
Upvote 0

ChristianCenturion

Veteran / Tuebor
Feb 9, 2005
14,207
576
In front of a computer
✟40,488.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican

You have attempted to address Fundamentalism and yet cite minor components. Perhaps the topic is either too large for you to be able to address or you need to be more careful about your words.
IOW - put away the wide-brush or be guilty of falsely accusing innocent parties.
 
Upvote 0

ChristianCenturion

Veteran / Tuebor
Feb 9, 2005
14,207
576
In front of a computer
✟40,488.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Fundamentalism: A usually religious movement or point of view characterized by a return to fundamental principles, by rigid adherence to those principles, and often by intolerance of other views and opposition to secularism.

peace

Yes, that looks familiar - perhaps wikipedia or webster.
Would you mind making bold the part where it says destroy? I didn't see it.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.