April_Rose
Well-Known Member
- Jul 4, 2020
- 3,815
- 2,459
- 35
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Female
- Faith
- Methodist
- Marital Status
- Engaged
Hehe sorry my bad.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
With all this chitchat, I had to doublecheck to make sure this thread was not called "Study Hall".
You wanna buy ancestry.com for me?Remember when I asked AV if he could give a list of his family tree stretching back to Adam and Eve? That would be a lot easier than what he's demanding (probably less than 200 generations, as opposed to 4.5 billion years of fossils), yet he refused to even try.
I believe that my post #383 unleashed all of this mayhem. I guess upon my exit I felt the need to annoy you one last time hahaWith all this chitchat, I had to doublecheck to make sure this thread was not called "Study Hall".
But there is history (apparent history, if you like). Why fill the rocks with billions of years of apparent evolution of a tree of life - creatures that, by your, assertion could never have existed, and why fill them with radioisotopes giving a consistent picture of billions of years of radioactive decay?God created the earth with age embedded in it.
Trees fully grown, Adam fully grown, rocks fully aged, etc.
Maturity without history.
If it is all wrong, why do we keep finding all this evidence for evolution? See 29+ Evidences for Macroevolution: The Scientific Case for Common Descent
Uh, no it was evidence even when I did not want it to be. It was evidence even when I was a creationist.Its evidence because you want it to be evidence.
How do you explain all the transitionals from the Model A to the Dodge Charger?How, for instance, do you explain all the transitional fossils from reptile to mammals?
How, for instance, do you explain all the transitional fossils from reptile to mammals?
There aren't.How do you explain all the transitionals from the Model A to the Dodge Charger?
How does that change the evidence or interpretation?Do you guys factor in the rate at which species die off?
Rates can be negotiated behind closed doors and adjusted accordingly.Do you guys factor in the rate at which species die off?
But parts can be force fit into other models, can they not?Cars don't form nested hierarchies and they don't reproduce.
There were people who learned from previous cars and built improvements.How do you explain all the transitionals from the Model A to the Dodge Charger?
How does that change the evidence or interpretation?
That's the point. That's how machines work... it's not how the evidence shows life has worked.But parts can be force fit into other models, can they not?
You would be cured of this erroneous view by spending several hours in a library. When you see what is there, it boggles the mind that all the journals could be nothing but sheer fabrication.Rates can be negotiated behind closed doors and adjusted accordingly.
Remember the moondust argument, and how deep it was supposed to be?
They are literally both extinct and transitional.Well, I would imagine that those transitionals are extinct species.
So if you knew these rates, you could see if it adds up.
Uh yes, skeletons of creatures that are no longer existing must be extinct species.Well, I would imagine that those transitionals are extinct species.
So if you knew these rates, you could see if it adds up.
Uh yes, skeletons of creatures that are no longer existing must be extinct species.
Sp why when we arrange them by date do we see this progression of the jaw joint and ear from reptile-like to mammal like?
They are literally both extinct and transitional.
Most transitional species we discover won't be directly ancestral, they just demonstrate that animal families that are now quite distinct were once much more similar.
Languages are a pretty good analogy for change in species. Modern French and modern Italian are similar but not the same... but if you go back thousand years they were both more similar to Latin and each other... and if you go back to the time of Christ they didn't even exist as languages except as regional variations of Ancient Roman Latin.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?