Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
An apology is not something you ask for and get in return on the internet.
What did I say wrong?
I was mostly being facetious, but you did insult my literacy...and I just showed you where you said exactly what I claimed you said...exactly what you said you didn't claim.
Hope it does not apply to you. (but I don't count on it)
Think it this way: the internet environment is perfect for making apology. Why not? What to lose?
Hey, I am going to accuse you that you can not read !!!
I did not say creationism IS scientific. I said creationism INCLUDES everything which is scientific.
Do you understand? Creationism has something IN EXTRA, which is not arguable.
Creationism can not be falsified does not mean creationism is not scientific. Everything of creationism is scientific, except the falsification part, which is religious.
I know what I am talking about. You give me a fossil sequence, and I will try to explain it scientifically.
I was mostly being facetious, but you did insult my literacy...and I just showed you where you said exactly what I claimed you said...exactly what you said you didn't claim.
I did not say creationism IS scientific. I said creationism INCLUDES everything which is scientific.
Do you understand? Creationism has something IN EXTRA, which is not arguable.
If you work in computer industry with this ignorance, you WILL have trouble.
What's in the Harry Potter does not INCLUDE science. "Inclusion" here is a logic term, but not a literature description.
You were wrong in this post:
Because you said:
I put the important bits in bold.
I did not say creationism IS scientific.
Everything of creationism is scientific, except the falsification part,
I did not say creationism IS scientific.
Everything of creationism is scientific, except the falsification part,
The above are your quotes.
I think your misunderstanding is not aware of the way I use the reserved word "IS". I am used to use it this way, and I guess you are not.
Here the "IS" means equivalent, equal. It is a logic use of the word.
With this explanation, I guess I don't see any problem of what I said. Falsification is a scientific idea and is not included in Creationism.
Well, I admit that the green text is not a clear description (falsification is not an element in the set of creationism). But I don't think it is a mistake.
Wow. Just...wow.
Then why did you claim creationism was scientific? If it is not falsifiable, it is not scientific.
In order for something to be scientific, it has to be ALL the things that constitute science. You can't say it is scientific, except for the falsification part. That exception excludes it from being science. Period.
If creationism is not falsifiable, by definition it is not scientific. Why is it so hard for you to understand this simple fact?
I learned that cows were selectively breed just as bananas.
I learned that cows were selectively breed just as bananas.
Why is it so hard for you to understand that science is only a subset of creationism?
I think you need to reread what I said. Pay particular attention to the bolded parts:
And you DID say that creationism IS scientific. In fact, you said EVERY PART of it is scientific, except falsification.
Also, in the post that I quoted from you, you did not even use the word "includes." You said that you never said creationism is scientific, but that you INSTEAD said that it INCLUDES science.
I clearly demonstrated that you did, in fact, say that creationism is scientific (except falsification). I replied by pointing out that without falsification, it's not science. You can't leave out one part of science and claim that it still uses science. Particularly such an important part of science.
pretty much, as there is no evidence of humans existing during of that time. I don't think that kind of cow would exist due to natural selection.Is that why there are no cows in the Devonian?
Which tells us that you are damaged beyond hope in a dream world of delusion and ignorance.Why is it so hard for you to understand that science is only a subset of creationism?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?