Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
All right. I explain it to you in plain English:.
I don't understand why you can't see the problem.
Then why can't we find their fossils? Why can't we find a single mammal, bird, reptile, species of grass, or flower in Devonian deposits?
The fossils and sediments found on the Earth were there in the past, and we can use them to reconstruct the past.
And you think Evolutionists are constructing their past very well??!!!!
As I search, I read alot of words such as "appearing" and coming into existance just like this without any traces of intermediate fossils, fishes "exploding" in the Devonian period, then again they "diversified rapidly again in the Mesozoic to Cenozoic, 120 to 60 million years ago on the timeline"
(Read more at The Fish Explosion - Creation RevolutionCreation Revolution). The second Age of fishes!!!!
"a new paper in PNAS that tried to paper over a lack of a single comprehensive phylogeny that has limited our understanding of the evolution and diversification of this radiation of our finny friends (Near et al., Resolution of ray-finned fish phylogeny and timing of diversification, PNAS August 6, 2012, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1206625109).
Read more at The Fish Explosion - Creation RevolutionCreation Revolution
I mean common!! Theories, explanations just keep changing!!! Dain, where have their heads gone? Oops we found these new fossils, but wait a sec, they are older, but ressemble our present day species! What happened?!! Wait a minute, there's another fish explosion!! The fish just exploded out of nowhere twice!!!! Wow, unbelievable!!
Here is a chart to show the difference between the evolution thought and the creation thought on the Sydney Area of Australia (I don't know why I can't post pictures):
http://biblicalgeology.net/images/stories/field_guides/comparison-lg.jpg
Oh for goodness' sake, stop reading creationist sources and start reading the real science. You'll find it much more demanding and not as much fun (initially) but the results will be far more rewarding.
Oh for goodness sake stop reading evolution sources and start reading the Truth! Evolution is not real science. Science uses the scientific method.
Theories and hypothesis are subject to change all the time, must be repeated, etc. That's what science is, it's not about finding our origins, which is just like a myth, a historical narrative!!!!
By the way I read both sites to get better understanding. My research is very rewarding by the way
Theories and hypothesis are subject to change all the time, must be repeated, etc.
Evolution is perfectly repeatable. You can see it happening all the time.
Rewarding in this sense doesn't mean quick thrills on the internet, which is what you are getting. When I was a young teenager I used to love those crazy magazines about UFOs and the paranormal and all the rest of it. But then one day you see through it and realise none of it is true. Then you become more interested in what is actually known and how people actually know it. How did they find out? Can we verify what they found out? etc.
I'm afraid until you tire of the stuff that promises you so much but gives you almost nothing of substance, you will just find yourself endlessly sifting through handfuls of loose sand.
Really? where?
What promises does the stuff give me?
If you say so, but most of us have been through that stage and know what it's all about.I am not getting thrills
Then evidently then you are not reading real science, as evolution is one of the most substantiated theories in all of science. But if you are doing so much research, presumably if you switched off your computer right now and sat with a pen and a pad of A4 you would have no trouble writing 1000 words explaining the major evidence supporting evolution., I am Learning more and evolution is starting to be quite funny now.
Dear Black Akuma, Where do you go to see Apes changing into Humans? God Bless you.
In Love,
Aman
We don't because humans are apes.
That's like asking where we see dogs change into poodles.
We don't because humans are apes.
That's like asking where we see dogs change into poodles.
Lol, dogs are poodles..
And humans have been humans since a while now, lol. Actually since the 6th day of creation!
Lol, dogs are poodles..
And humans have been humans since a while now, lol. Actually since the 6th day of creation!
A critical faculty for one thing. Which you clearly haven't got at the moment.
If you say so, but most of us have been through that stage and know what it's all about.
Then evidently then you are not reading real science, as evolution is one of the most substantiated theories in all of science. But if you are doing so much research, presumably if you switched off your computer right now and sat with a pen and a pad of A4 you would have no trouble writing 1000 words explaining the major evidence supporting evolution.
Congratulations. You've understood the analogy.
Poodles are poodles for a while now, lol. Actually since humans bred them that way through artificial selection.
Humans are a kind of ape. Poodles are a kind of dog. Good. Now you're ready to put the square peg into the square hole.
I think I'd have huge trouble writing down the evidence supporting evolution because nothing is observed in the past and the scientific method is not used properly.
I can however write a huge paper on everythingI'v learned so far in January on evolution and creationism.
We can observe evolution in organisms. A classic example are nylon-eating bacteria.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?