• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Who is the Innkeeper in the Parable of the Good Samaritan?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Asinner

Seeking Salvation
Jul 15, 2005
5,899
358
✟30,272.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Private
This subject came up in another thread about whether we need to confess our sins to a priest . . .









"A fundamental teaching of the Holy Fathers is that the Church is a "Hospital" which cures the wounded man. In many passages of Holy Scripture such language is used. One such passage is that of the parable of the Good Samaritan: "But a certain Samaritan, as he journeyed, came where he was. And when he saw him, he had compassion . So he went to him and bandaged his wounds, pouring on oil and wine; and he set him on his own animal, and brought him to an inn, and took care of him. On the next day, when he departed, he took out two denarii, and gave them to the innkeeper, and said to him, 'Take care of him; and whatever more you spend, when I come again, I will repay you" (Luke 10:33-35).
In this parable, the Samaritan represents Christ who cured the wounded man and led him to the Inn, that is to the "Hospital" which is the Church. It is evident here that Christ is presented as the Healer, the physician who cures man's maladies; and the Church as the true Hospital. It is very characteristic that Saint John Chrysostom, analysing this parable, presents these truths emphasised above.
Man's life "in Paradise" was reduced to a life governed by the devil and his wiles. "And fell among thieves," that is in the hands of the devil and of all the hostile powers. The wounds man suffered are the various sins, as the prophet David says: "my wounds grow foul and fester because of my foolishness" (Psalm 37). For "every sin causes a bruise and a wound." The Samaritan is Christ Himself who descended to earth from Heaven in order to cure the wounded man. He used oil and wine to "treat" the wounds; in other words, by "mingling His blood with the Holy Spirit, he brought man to life." According to another interpretation, oil corresponds to the comforting word and wine to the harsh word. Mingled together they have the power to unify the scattered mind. "He set him in His own beast," that is He assumed human flesh on "the shoulders" of His divinity and ascended incarnate to His Father in Heaven.
Then the Good Samaritan, i.e. Christ, took man to the grand, wondrous and spacious inn - to the Church. And He handed man over to the innkeeper, who is the Apostle Paul, and through the Apostle Paul to all bishops and priests, saying: "Take care of the Gentile people, whom I have handed over to you in the Church. They suffer illness wounded by sin, so cure them, using as remedies the words of the Prophets and the teaching of the Gospel; make them healthy through the admonitions and comforting word of the Old and New Testaments." Thus, according to Saint Chrysostom, Paul is he who maintains the Churches of God, "curing all people by his spiritual admonitions and offering to each one of them what they really need."
In the interpretation of this parable by Saint John Chrysostom, it is clearly shown that the Church is a Hospital which cures people wounded by sin; and the bishops and priests are the therapists of the people of God."


taken from: http://www.orthodoxinfo.com/inquirers/hierotheos_difference.aspx


God Bless :)
 

tapero

Legend
Site Supporter
Apr 14, 2004
36,575
1,128
Visit site
✟111,044.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
This is not an educated post but if you spiritualize that scripture which I've never thought of, I would have to say the wounded man is Christ. (Saul, Saul, why do you persecute me.)

The other part I may be in ignorance also is that the bible tells us to confess our sins one to another. I don't know of scripture where it says to confess to a priest. Unless I'm missing something in the o.t. that is being spiritualized that I also perhaps read literally.

I hope it my was okay to post here, I thought I could write my answer since it was GT. thanks.
 
Upvote 0

winslow

Regular Member
Dec 25, 2005
691
40
✟16,003.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
The point being made in the parable is who fulfills the law of Christ? Those who wear christian garments and proclaim Him with their lips but not in deeds, or those who do His will? Focusing too much on the innkeeper draws you away from the intent of the parable. It was not the innkeeper that stopped by the path to help the man. In fact the innkeeper was paid mammon for any services he performed.
 
Upvote 0

Maximus

Orthodox Christian
Jun 24, 2003
5,822
373
✟7,903.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
winslow said:
The point being made in the parable is who fulfills the law of Christ? Those who wear christian garments and proclaim Him with their lips but not in deeds, or those who do His will? Focusing too much on the innkeeper draws you away from the intent of the parable. It was not the innkeeper that stopped by the path to help the man. In fact the innkeeper was paid mammon for any services he performed.

Well, Ricky had Lucy and Little Ricky to support, after all.

Ba-ba-loo!
 
Upvote 0

Asinner

Seeking Salvation
Jul 15, 2005
5,899
358
✟30,272.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Private
winslow said:
The point being made in the parable is who fulfills the law of Christ? Those who wear christian garments and proclaim Him with their lips but not in deeds, or those who do His will? Focusing too much on the innkeeper draws you away from the intent of the parable. It was not the innkeeper that stopped by the path to help the man. In fact the innkeeper was paid mammon for any services he performed.

My point being that the Inn needs an Innkeeper just as the Church needs bishops and priests.

God Bless :)
 
Upvote 0

GraceInHim

† Need a lifeguard? Mine walks on water †
Oct 25, 2005
18,636
924
MA
✟24,206.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
winslow said:
The point being made in the parable is who fulfills the law of Christ? Those who wear christian garments and proclaim Him with their lips but not in deeds, or those who do His will? Focusing too much on the innkeeper draws you away from the intent of the parable. It was not the innkeeper that stopped by the path to help the man. In fact the innkeeper was paid mammon for any services he performed.
was paid 2 denari's not mammon, and in those days, a days work was worth 1 denari.. and in the story, the Samaritan still is yet to return..
 
Upvote 0

Maximus

Orthodox Christian
Jun 24, 2003
5,822
373
✟7,903.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
GraceInHim said:
was paid 2 denari's not mammon, and in those days, a days work was worth 1 denari.. and in the story, the Samaritan still is yet to return..

Good points.

And it is the Samaritan (Christ) who commissions the innkeeper to care for the man who fell among thieves and who promises to repay the innkeeper upon his return.

Nowhere in the story do we see the innkeeper depicted as greedy for mammon or failing to carry out his charge.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GraceInHim
Upvote 0

Asinner

Seeking Salvation
Jul 15, 2005
5,899
358
✟30,272.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Private
Maximus said:
Good points.

And it is the Samaritan (Christ) who commissions the innkeeper to care for the man who fell among thieves and who promises to repay the innkeeper upon his return.

Nowhere in the story do we see the innkeeper depicted as greedy for mammon or failing to carry out his charge.

Very true. It is my favorite parable.

God Bless :)
 
Upvote 0

Maximus

Orthodox Christian
Jun 24, 2003
5,822
373
✟7,903.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
Here is something St. Augustine wrote (and preached as part of a sermon) on this subject.

St. Augustine said:
For when the Jews had said, "Say we not well that thou art a Samaritan, and hast a devil?" of these two charges cast at Him, He denied the one, but not the other. For He answered and said, "I have not a devil" He did not say, I am not a Samaritan; and yet the two charges had been made. Although He returned not cursing with cursing, although He met not slander with slander, yet was it proper for Him to deny the one charge and not to deny the other. And not without a purpose, brethren. For Samaritan means keeper. He knew that He was our keeper. For "He that keepeth Israel neither slumbereth nor sleepeth;" and, "Except the Lord keep the city, they wake in vain who keep it." He then is our Keeper who is our Creator. For did it belong to Him to redeem us, and would it not be His to preserve us? Finally, that you may know more fully the hidden reason why He ought not to have denied that He was a Samaritan, call to mind that well-known parable, where a certain man went down from Jerusalem to Jericho, and fell among thieves, who wounded him severely, and left him half dead on the road. A priest came along and took no notice of him. A Levite came up, and he also passed on his way. A certain Samaritan came up --He who is our Keeper. He went up to the wounded man. He exercised mercy, and did a neighbor's part to one whom He did not account an alien. To this, then, He only replied that He had not a devil, but not that He was not a Samaritan (Tractates on the Gospel According to St. John, Tractate 43, Chapter 8).
 
Upvote 0

Morghaine

Studying
Site Supporter
Jan 29, 2006
7,721
228
Ozark MO
✟88,131.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
I always thought of the innkeeper as the disciples (and subsequent followers) - and Jesus as the good Samaritan. I always thought He was commissioning us as followers to take care of others until His return (and we will get our reward).
 
Upvote 0

icxn

Bραδύγλωσσος αἰπόλος μαθητεύων κνίζειν συκάμινα
Dec 13, 2004
3,092
886
✟218,365.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Private
tapero said:
This is not an educated post but if you spiritualize that scripture which I've never thought of, I would have to say the wounded man is Christ. (Saul, Saul, why do you persecute me.)
If you want to spiritualize the passage i.e. expound on the moral teaching, then we would take the innkeeper as the virtue of vigilance, the wounded man as the soul and the thieves as the demons whereas the two denarii are the two commandments that the Lord gave us: love for Him and love for our neighbor. Those who vigilantly keep watch after their soul: avoiding the passions (the snares of thieves) and practicing the virtues, prove to be good innkeepers and for whatever good works they perform the Lord will repay them when He returns: “And the next day he took out two denarii and gave them to the innkeeper, saying, `Take care of him; and whatever more you spend, I will repay you when I come back.' (Lk. 10:35)
Love of God is opposed to desire, for it persuades the intellect to control itself with regard to sensual pleasures. Love for our neighbor is opposed to anger, for it makes us scorn fame and riches. These are the two denarii which our Savior gave to the innkeeper (cf. Luke 10:31), so that he should take care of you. But do not be thoughtless and associate with robbers; otherwise you will be beaten again and left not merely unconscious but dead. - St. Maximus
 
Upvote 0
Sep 10, 2004
6,609
414
Kansas City area
✟31,271.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
For when the Jews had said, "Say we not well that thou art a Samaritan, and hast a devil?" of these two charges cast at Him, He denied the one, but not the other. For He answered and said, "I have not a devil" He did not say, I am not a Samaritan; and yet the two charges had been made. Although He returned not cursing with cursing, although He met not slander with slander, yet was it proper for Him to deny the one charge and not to deny the other. And not without a purpose, brethren. For Samaritan means keeper. He knew that He was our keeper. For "He that keepeth Israel neither slumbereth nor sleepeth;" and, "Except the Lord keep the city, they wake in vain who keep it." He then is our Keeper who is our Creator. For did it belong to Him to redeem us, and would it not be His to preserve us? Finally, that you may know more fully the hidden reason why He ought not to have denied that He was a Samaritan, call to mind that well-known parable, where a certain man went down from Jerusalem to Jericho, and fell among thieves, who wounded him severely, and left him half dead on the road. A priest came along and took no notice of him. A Levite came up, and he also passed on his way. A certain Samaritan came up --He who is our Keeper. He went up to the wounded man. He exercised mercy, and did a neighbor's part to one whom He did not account an alien. To this, then, He only replied that He had not a devil, but not that He was not a Samaritan (Tractates on the Gospel According to St. John, Tractate 43, Chapter 8).


I love the theology of the Church. Nice post Maximus. :thumbsup:
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.