Appereantly you either did not read the previous post, don't know how to do bible study. Daniel 10 Explicity say Micheal the archangel, Come and help the Being in the White robe (Christ) see Rev 1:12-15 Daniel 10:13But the prince of the kingdom of Persia was withstanding me for twenty-one days; then behold, Michael, one of the chief princes, came to help me, for I had been left there with the kings of Persia. Me is the same person in Daniel 10:5,6 13 5I lifted my eyes and looked, and behold, there was a certain man dressed in linen, whose waist was girded with a belt of pure gold of Uphaz. 6His body also was like beryl, his face had the appearance of lightning, his eyes were like flaming torches, his arms and feet like the gleam of polished bronze, and the sound of his words like the sound of a tumult. that person is not Michael
Well, nobody here are contending that there are more than one heavenly characters portrayed in Daniel 10, we all agree about that. You say that many people argue that the character speaking in Daniel 10 is Christ, and point to Revelation 1 to back up this claim.
To answer this I would like to point out that yes, there are parallels between Dan 10 and Rev 1, yet these parallels cannot be used as evidence that Christ is the one
speaking in this passage.
If you read Daniel 10 closely you'll find many parallels to the vision of the Cherubim in Ezekiel 1. (Jasper, lightning, torches, polished bronze, the voice like a large crowd.) In fact, I found 5 parallels to the vision of the angels in Ezekiel 1, whereas I found 4 parallels to Revelation 1.
Secondly, in Revelation 1 Christ is also depicted with imagery drawn from the description of God (the Father) in Daniel 7, so parallels alone doesn't settle the discussion here. If they did, then you could argue that Christ is the Father, and that's obviously not the meaning of Revelation 1.
In Daniel 10 the one speaking said:
But Michael, one of the leading princes, came to help me, because I was left there with the kings of Persia. This strongly suggest that the speaker isn't Christ, because the preincarnate and omnipotent Christ wouldn't need help from an angel in order to deal with the king of Persia.
So basically there are two possibilities here:
a) The first possibility is that the divine being and the speaker in this passage merely was an unnamed angel, possibly Gabriel.
b) The second possibility is that Christ indeed was the being Daniel saw, but that another angel was present and was the one that spoke to Daniel. As argued here by people that are
not adventists:
Is Christ in Daniel 10? - Rev. Charles Cooper
Finally, I wanted to point out to you that Adventists believe in the trinity and in the full divinity of Christ. Even if we tend to argue that «Michael» refers to the preincarnated Christ, we believe that Christ wasn't a created being, he was one with the Father from eternity. Thus, there is no need for controversy over this, this is a minor point, and there's definitely no reason for rudeness.