Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Oh. I haven't been following closely all the threads, and he mentions generally some and so I guessed that's what he was talking about. I don't know. I think Rus has said he realizes some things aren't dogma with regards to those subjects we discussed.Apparently not, as some posting in this thread think certain positions which are well within the bounds of the Church are in fact outside those bounds and argue quite vigorously, or at least echo quite thoroughly amongst themselves, when brought up. I strenuously object to being bullied about things which, as you put it, are not dogma because nobody knows the details because they weren't revealed by God. Which is what's happening elsewhere and what rusmeister is referring to doing here in this thread.
Yes, I realize that there are some writings from the Saints on some of these issues that the Church hasn't dogmatized (if that's a word). I tend to follow what they say, but I do know that the Church hasn't formally made life after death - details - and the details of all about the creation, except that we were made in His Image....no other being was. That Adam and Eve were/are real human beings, and that God created all things recorded in Genesis. There's no dogma on where the dinos were, when they were destroyed, how old the earth is, and if the six days are literally six and a day means 24 hours. Yes, we have writings from some Saints who have commented on some of that or most of that, but it isn't dogma in our church, is it? For instance, I have no problem believing the earth is older than 10,000 years. I have no problem believing the dinos were inside or outside the Garden at some point. Anyway, I don't think the Saints were wrong. I think their visions are correct. I'm just saying that it is not dogma - it was not made dogma out of total consensus of the Church. Why? Because the way I understand it is that if something isn't dogma in our Church, it isn't needed for our salvation. What is needed is that we were made in His Image and likeness, what happened in the Garden and the Fall, etc.Dot - the issue is that, when we start to read the Fathers writing on these topics, we start to find out that these things ARE revealed. For instance, many Saints have seen the creation of the world in a vision revealed by God. That, or they are delusional and only THINK God sent them a vision ...
We needn't make it a false dichotomy, since the world is in fact 4.5 billion years old (and the universe 14 billion). There are certainly ways for both to be true. Use your nous.
We needn't make it a false dichotomy, since the world is in fact 4.5 billion years old (and the universe 14 billion). There are certainly ways for both to be true. Use your nous.
Dot - I think your post leads us back to the question Rus has been raising - about Church authority. We have to ask ourselves what it means for something to be dogmatic? Are only the declarations of the Councils dogmatic? If so, who says so? Do the Councils say so? It's the same question we have with Sola Scriptura - do the Scriptures ever claim to be the sole source of dogma?
What I've been told is if the Church has declared something dogmatic, it must be believed to be an Orthodox Christian (Christian period imo), and it is needed for our salvation.
I wouldn't think we'd be praying something we didn't believe. I'm not sure I understand what you mean about the monastics and the services? The liturgy is part of Holy Tradition - that's considered part of the Dogmatic Tradition of the Church, according to my archdiocese. Am I misunderstanding what you're saying?i understood, Dot. that's something we hear often, but I think we don't go deeper than this often enough. we should ask - what does it mean for the Church to declare something? if 1000's (or millions) of monastics around the world are praying the daily services every day, does this count as a declaration of the content of the services? do we pray something we don't believe?
I wouldn't think we'd be praying something we didn't believe. I'm not sure I understand what you mean about the monastics and the services? The liturgy is part of Holy Tradition - that's considered part of the Dogmatic Tradition of the Church, according to my archdiocese. Am I misunderstanding what you're saying?
no, i think your Archdiocese gave a pretty good answer - they didn't limit Dogma to the Councils only. but for instance, the services speak of the toll houses and demons coming to take our souls when we die -- how then can these things be considered non-dogmatic, when they are boldly proclaimed by millions every day?
This post is exactly what I'm referring to in my post! You are purposely trying to push Rus's buttons! You know that these numbers are theoretically, cannot be proven, and you are very aware how this will provoke him. Then you'll say he's bullying, when in reality he's presenting the other side of the argument. We cannot affirm with absolute metaphysical certitude these ages you throw out here. When you speak with such abject confidence and make this a type of certain scientific gospel, this only adds fuel to the fires....
It is certainly true that sola councila (if that's a word) is just as erroneous as sola scriptura.
Indeed. While, in my opinion, the specific language of "toll houses" seems unhelpful most of the time, the reality behind the language is a very real experience of the Church.
Hmmm. I don't know. I asked my husband since he happened to be here. What hymn or service are you talking about? I know that the Greek Orthodox Church doesn't believe in the toll houses because I was at a lecture on Clean Monday when somebody asked that, and the priest said they don't really believe in that. It's not in our tradition (the Greek one). My husband said the Ladder of Divine Ascent is the only thing he can think of that may be correlated to the toll house idea. ??? Anyhow, do you know any hymns or services exactly?no, i think your Archdiocese gave a pretty good answer - they didn't limit Dogma to the Councils only. but for instance, the services speak of the toll houses and demons coming to take our souls when we die -- how then can these things be considered non-dogmatic, when they are boldly proclaimed by millions every day?
Hmmm. I don't know. I asked my husband since he happened to be here. What hymn or service are you talking about? I know that the Greek Orthodox Church doesn't believe in the toll houses because I was at a lecture on Clean Monday when somebody asked that, and the priest said they don't really believe in that. It's not in our tradition (the Greek one). My husband said the Ladder of Divine Ascent is the only thing he can think of that may be correlated to the toll house idea. ??? Anyhow, do you know any hymns or services exactly?
Hmmm. I don't know. I asked my husband since he happened to be here. What hymn or service are you talking about? I know that the Greek Orthodox Church doesn't believe in the toll houses because I was at a lecture on Clean Monday when somebody asked that, and the priest said they don't really believe in that. It's not in our tradition (the Greek one). My husband said the Ladder of Divine Ascent is the only thing he can think of that may be correlated to the toll house idea. ??? Anyhow, do you know any hymns or services exactly?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?