Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Nope. . ."All who rely on observing the law are under a curse (death)." (Galatians 3:10) "The law is death" is short version for: "the curse of the law is death," which curse all those who relied on observing the law were under "(Galatians 3:10).
"The law is death" is short version for: "the curse of the law is death," which curse all those who relied on observing the law were under "(Galatians 3:10), from which curse Jesus redeemed us (Galatians 3:13).
I already responded to that in the post above -- it is the same "gentile" group as in Acts 15. And there Peter says it is a gentile such as the Roman Centurion - Cornelius, except in his case he is not a pagan gentile at the time he converts to Christianity..
Agreed - but Paul does say his teaching was being included and received as the "Word of God" -- but I agree that 2 Tim 3 is a reference to the OT text primarily since Paul says Timothy had been taught from it from childhood and so also Timothy's grandmother.
Those days were long gone.Revelation 2 is specifically addressing the Church at Ephesus this was a Church under Paul's teachings until they all turned away from him. Ephesus was the Capital of Asia.
(CLV) 2Ti 1:15 - Of this you are aware, that all those in the province of Asia were turned from me, of whom are Phygellus and Hermogenes.
Did they turn from him; because he was telling them that they could no longer eat meat sacrificed to idols?
Why harmonize it with Revelation 2?1 Corinthians 8 is only 13 verses long. Verse 1 seems to reveal the subject of this chapter.
Since it's such a short chapter; maybe you can walk me through, verse by verse to explain what in the world Paul is talking about here; and then harmonize it with what Yahshua said to the Church at Ephesus in Revelation 2.
I look forward to your scholarly dissection.
idolatrous sacrifices = food sacrificed to idols,(CLV) 1Co 8:1
Now concerning the idol sacrifices: We are aware that we all have knowledge. Knowledge puffs up, yet love builds up.
The man who thinks he knows something does not know as he ought to know; i.e.,(CLV) 1Co 8:2
If anyone is presuming to know anything, he knew not as yet according as he must know.
Knowledge tempered with love toward God shows that one is known and loved by God as one of God's own redeemed.(CLV) 1Co 8:3
Now if anyone is loving God, this one is known by Him.
idol is nothing = it's not a real god and possesses no power,(CLV) 1Co 8:4
Then, concerning the feeding on the idol sacrifices: We are aware that an idol is nothing in the world, and that there is no other God except One.
For even if there are so-called gods whether in heaven or on earth (as indeed there are many "gods" and many "lords),(CLV) 1Co 8:5
For even if so be that there are those being termed gods, whether in heaven or on earth, even as there are many gods and many lords,
nevertheless there is but one God, the Father, from whom all things come and from whom we live;(CLV) 1Co 8:6
nevertheless for us there is one God, the Father, out of Whom all is, and we for Him, and one Lord, Jesus Christ, through Whom all is, and we through Him.
not in all = not everyone knows this, that an idol has no personal reality,(CLV) 1Co 8:7
But not in all is there this knowledge. Now some, used hitherto to the idol, are eating of it as an idol sacrifice, and their conscience, being weak, is being polluted.
Food does not bring us near to God(CLV) 1Co 8:8
Now food will not give us a standing with God, neither, if we should not be eating are we in want, nor if we should be eating are we cloyed.
right of yours = exercise of your freedom--be careful that it does not become a stumbling block to the weak,(CLV) 1Co 8:9
Now beware lest somehow this right of yours may become a stumbling block to the weak.
If anyone seeing you, who have this knowledge (of freedom)(CLV) 1Co 8:10
For if anyone should be seeing you, who |has knowledge, lying down in an idol's shrine, will not the conscience of him who |is weak be |inured to the eating of the idol sacrifices?
So this weak brother is destroyed by your knowledge (of the truth), for whom Christ died.(CLV) 1Co 8:11
For the weak one is perishing also by your knowledge; the brother because of whom Christ died.
Now in sinning against your brother in this way, and wounding his weak conscience, you are sinning against Christ.(CLV) 1Co 8:12
Now in thus sinning against brethren, and beating their weak conscience, you are sinning against Christ.
If what I eat causes my brother to sin, I will never eat meat again, so that I will not cause him to fall.(CLV) 1Co 8:13
Wherefore, if food is snaring my brother, I may under no circumstances be eating meat for the eon, lest I should be snaring my brother.
The law of sin and death, which Paul told us how to identify earlier. You know, the one that brought sin to life and killed Paul. Which law is that? The one that contains the words "you shall not covet." Hmm...that sounds really familiar. Almost straight out of the law written on tablets of stone. Like...the 10 commandments...almost. Almost.Again, which law?
Romans 8 (CLV)
1 Nothing, consequently, is now condemnation to those in Christ Jesus. Not according to flesh are they walking, but according to spirit, 2 for the spirit's law of life in Christ Jesus frees you from the law of sin and death.
Talk is cheap. . .Thank you for asking.
You pit the Spirit against the Law; but Paul says the Law is of the Spirit.
Those days were long gone.
They probably couldn't find him (1:7), chained (1:16, 2:9) and rotting in that cold Roman dungeon (4:13).
However, I see prophecy as figurative, so prophecy will have to be excluded from anything I examine as didactical.
Why harmonize it with Revelation 2?
I'm convinced of the whole counsel of Paul which does not set Scripture against itself.
Caesar's law, right?Which law?
Romans 8 (CLV)
1 Nothing, consequently, is now condemnation to those in Christ Jesus. Not according to flesh are they walking, but according to spirit, 2 for the spirit's law of life in Christ Jesus frees you from the law of sin and death.
Talk is cheap. .
I said the Spirit does make us righteous.
You get to demonstrate that my statement is not Biblical.
The Mosaic law given by God, which they couldn't keep according to God's requirements
Should I just start at Genesis 1:1 and exegete all the way to Jude 25?Paul outlines his expressions of laws in his letter to the Romans.
The Law of Faith (Ch 3)
A Different Law (Ch 7)
The Law of My Mind (Ch 7)
The Law of Sin (Sin's Law) (Ch 7)
God's Law (Ch 7)
The Spirit's Law of Life (Ch 8)
The Law of Sin and Death (Ch 8)
Now certainly you aren't working under the assumption that Paul is equating the Torah (God's Law) to (The Law of Sin and Death) transgression of (God's Law)?
What, then, shall we declare? That the law is sin? May it not be coming to that!
What are we deciding?
When you demonstrate that my statement is not Biblical, (post #68), we will move to the next thing on the table.So now Paul's assertions are cheap talk? Is this an attempt to evade the fact that Paul said that the Law is of the the Spirit?
How does it do that?
You get to go first.
Please prove that the law is not of the Spirit, with YHWH's word.
Should I just start at Genesis 1:1 and exegete all the way to Jude 25?
Give the verses where each of these laws are found, that I may examine them.
I sense insincerity here.When you demonstrate that my statement is not Biblical, (post #68), we will move to the next thing on the table.
I'm engaging with you, not a video.Nope, this thread is about Paul's uses of the word Law.
I provided a link to a study on this subject in the OP. I would encourage you to read it over, in context, for proper hermeneutics.
When you demonstrate that my statement is not Biblical, (post #68), we will move to the next thing on the table.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?