Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I think that out of the 3 candidates for the tomb that the Garden Tomb near Skull Hill / Gordon's Calvary is the best candidate. The Holy Sepulcher is very doubtful for various reasons, and the Talpiot tomb certainly doesn't match the Jesus of the gospels. All-Dread: Garden Tomb
No, the so-called garden tomb has been proven not be correct. The only tomb that has been proven historically and archeologically is in the Church of the Resurrection.
Where can I see the alleged proof that Garden Tomb not correct and that Holy Sepulcher correct? As I haven't seen/heard any proof for those. Once I see the evidence I can then give my weighing of it plus try to collate my own past evidences on Holy Sepulcher and on Garden Tomb.
National Geographic has done work on it. Dr Biddle has written a book on it. The garden tomb is much too old to be correct (see Israel's leading archaeologists Dr. Gabby Barkay's and Dr. Danny Bahat's research). Within the Church, there are other 1st Century tombs. Everything fits for the Church tomb and almost nothing fits for the garden tomb. Lots of research out there...
This is an interesting claim. What are the other sites and "saints" and holy days that you believe are reassigned from pagan? What evidence do you have to back up this claim?I believe they lyingly reassigned the pagan site to christian site like they also did with many other sites and "saints" and holy days.
Mosheli said:
I believe they lyingly reassigned the pagan site to christian site like they also did with many other sites and "saints" and holy days.
This is an interesting claim. What are the other sites and "saints" and holy days that you believe are reassigned from pagan? What evidence do you have to back up this claim?
Well, imagine how surreal it would be to actually know for a fact where it is!! Just standing there would be the most intense natural high ever. I think I’d be more inclined to visit the holy land if such locations were not just educated guesses, but you knew for a fact that you were standing on the exact spot without question.Like the Angels said, Why are you looking among the dead? He has risen.'
Well, imagine how surreal it would be to actually know for a fact where it is!! Just standing there would be the most intense natural high ever. I think I’d be more inclined to visit the holy land if such locations were not just educated guesses, but you knew for a fact that you were standing on the exact spot without question.
Is Aruba JUST a place? Is the Great Pyramid of Giza just a rock?? Was it over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor???The place is just a place. It is the Facts and how we relate to them that matters.
None of Wyatt's claims have been verified. He is the only one to have 'seen' what he claims to have seen. No peer review, no other witnesses, just his word.See my notes on the Garden Tomb and Holy Sepulcher here
Garden Tomb versus Holy Sepulchre
(sorry too long to post here and I don't have the alot of time either). Note the bits on Aramathea/Arimathea, etc. I think the Garden tomb is surely right for all the reasons in the table there.
None of Wyatt's claims have been verified. He is the only one to have 'seen' what he claims to have seen. No peer review, no other witnesses, just his word.
See my notes on the Garden Tomb and Holy Sepulcher here
Garden Tomb versus Holy Sepulchre
(sorry too long to post here and I don't have the alot of time either). Note the bits on Aramathea/Arimathea, etc. I think the Garden tomb is surely right for all the reasons in the table there.
The garden tomb is not even a 1st century AD tomb lol! The tomb has been dated by Israeli archaeologist Gabriel Barkay to the 8th–7th centuries BC.
The date is not so certain as they claim. And even if it is the meaning of the words "new tomb" "never laid" is also not so certain meaning/interpretation as made out esp conparing all 4 gospels versions. So this recurring claimed disproof is not definite reliable proof/disproof of anything against the Garden tomb. And if people are so smart I don't see anyone has found any other better candidate since the only other rival one the Holy Sepulchre is proven a fake in my table in that paper. Barkay is also maybe not a true Jewish or Messianic/Christian believer. If you really genuine follower of HaDerek Yeshua ask him and also strive to find the truth and he will help see which side evidences are more quality and quantity even if he doesn't always clearly easily fully show the stark whole truth in everything yet.
Is Aruba JUST a place? Is the Great Pyramid of Giza just a rock?? Was it over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor???
LOL, all you provide is excuses! Most real scientists/archaeologists say the garden tomb is fake while those same scientist say the Holy Tomb site is really the best candidate. Barkay is a scientist. That he is Jewish makes what he says regarding this even more unbaised IMO. That Garden tomb has no leg to stand on...
Not true. In the paper I gave link to I provided evidences not excuses. Only reliable actual detail matches evidences matter, not credentials/authority. Even "experts" and majorities can by lying or wrong or exclusive. Jewish unbiased? Hello, remember how they treated Jesus and what Jesus said about them? Only 1/3rd of Jews will be saved, the 2/3rds rest perish. I respect Messianic Jews, and I even respect non-Messianic Jews insights on biblical meanings and cultural background etc. But unsaved Jews are not unbiased etc. Everything I have to say on the Garden Tomb and Holy Sepulchre is already said in that free paper, and it is too long to post here all in one or bit by bit sorry. The GT date is not definitely reliable, and/or the NT "new" "never laid" is not definitely correctly translated/interpreted/understood, so the dates objection is not definite disproof/proof against the GT, and it is not just excuses it is just simply not trusting some "experts" claims as if they are all right gods but trying best to see the truth through the evidences claims. However we are both free to agree to disagree and to respect each others reasons why. It is not necessarily a big/major deal like a salvation issue.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?