Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
You misunderstand science. The point and purpose of science is for us to test out our beliefs, no matter how sacred they may be. When it comes to the biblical cosmology, science has rendered that obsolete, since the 16th century. As to people rising from the dead, I know of no doctor who says that is impossible. After all, there are plenty of documented cases today where medicine has brought back someone who was clinically dead. If we can do it, then certainly God can.
Man can't do it after three days -or four- to dead bodies not on machines and left outside, buried.You misunderstand science. The point and purpose of science is for us to test out our beliefs, no matter how sacred they may be. When it comes to the biblical cosmology, science has rendered that obsolete, since the 16th century. As to people rising from the dead, I know of no doctor who says that is impossible. After all, there are plenty of documented cases today where medicine has brought back someone who was clinically dead. If we can do it, then certainly God can.
I am a proponent of creationism that leans toward 6k year old Earth, but I don't see it in scripture.
Yet, I certainly do not trust science as a whole that strings together a series of superflous logical steps to conclude the Earth is not 6k years old. I'd more likely believe a myth from another religion that believe the story science has invented because I can go through the various holes in their logic in detail and it is just nonsense.
That said, people who want to argue from scripture that the Earth is much older, but there was no death until Adam's fall, and that mankind only goes back that 6k years or something like this... but the Earth is much older, I cannot say they are wrong from scripture. They could be wrong or they could be right but I have not seen scripture to prove it one way or the other.
What is proven is that the time periods in Genesis representing days, are not exactly days by the admission of scripture itself. There is likely deep meaning in why a day is not an actual day, and we can probably find prophetic implications and symbolic implications for that going forward, but I would not know them yet.
I believe the notion that the Earth specifically would be 6k years old, would be based on 6 literal Earth days of creation, but that's not exactly what the text said occurred.
But is it then millions and billions of years old? I doubt that highly too.
Man is something like 6k years old, going back to Adam the first man, made by God, but the Earth itself could be older.
If man goes back 6,000 years then the Earth is certainly older. Then if you accept Adam might have been a new type of man then you can accept that man could be much older in different types of man. Adam was the first man, of his own race or lineage not the first human ever
Problem is evolution was disproven in the 60's and 70's by mathematics.
Problem is evolution was disproven in the 60's and 70's by mathematics.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutral_theory_of_molecular_evolution
Fossils don't say much, other than there were strange types of men, but prior versions?
No. The word human is the word from Adam.If man goes back 6,000 years then the Earth is certainly older. Then if you accept Adam might have been a new type of man then you can accept that man could be much older in different types of man. Adam was the first man, of his own race or lineage not the first human ever
Yes, it is the Adam.Can anyone tell us of the Image of God Scripturally?
Yes, it is the Adam.
Genesis 1: let "us"[=the One God in three Persons, a self existing, closed = not reproducing, multiplicity of the One YHWH, the One Living Spirit], "make Adam in our image, after our likeness/צֶלֶם tselem -and let them have dominion"...
God has an image, a tselem, and it is the Adam creation, but WAIT: the image of God that Adam was made in "was to come", and "has come", "and is coming". He was kept secret, hidden in God, with God, and was God, until He was made manifest. God has come in the flesh, and He is the image of God that Adam was made in, states Romans 5:14 -the very "tupos"/ of God, like a news print type, was the Adam flesh formed in.
Rom 5:14 Nevertheless death reigned from Adam to Moses, even over them that had not sinned after the similitude of Adam's transgression, who is the figure/typos of him that was to come.
Adam was made in the "figure/Typos of Him who was to come: typos: the mark of a stroke or blow, print a figure formed by a blow or impression
Jhn 14:9 Jesus saith unto him, Have I been so long time with you, and yet hast thou not known me, Philip? he that hath seen me hath seen the Father; and how sayest thou then, Shew us the Father?
Eze 1:26 And above the firmament that was over their heads was the likeness of a throne, as the appearance of a sapphire stone: and upon the likeness of the throne was the likeness as the appearance of Adam above upon it.
You misunderstand science. The point and purpose of science is for us to test out our beliefs, no matter how sacred they may be. When it comes to the biblical cosmology, science has rendered that obsolete, since the 16th century. As to people rising from the dead, I know of no doctor who says that is impossible. After all, there are plenty of documented cases today where medicine has brought back someone who was clinically dead. If we can do it, then certainly God can.
No. The word human is the word from Adam.
Adam is the first human being created son of God.
Adam is made male and female, and the two are named "Adam".
Adam means "man" -specifically, "human".
How did you miss the message of the post -big time!↑
Aman:>>Can anyone tell us of the Image of God Scripturally?
***Yes, it is the Adam.
Are you sure? Read this:
12 Giving thanks unto the Father, which hath made us meet to be partakers of the inheritance of the saints in light: 13 Who hath delivered us from the power of darkness, and hath translated us into the kingdom of His dear Son: 14 In Whom we have redemption through His blood, even the forgiveness of sins:
15 Who is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of every creature: 16 For by Him were all things created, that are in heaven, and that are in earth, visible and invisible, whether they be thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers: all things were created by Him, and for Him. 17 And He is before all things, and by him all things consist.18 And He is the head of the body, the Church: Who is the beginning, the firstborn from the dead; that in all things He might have the preeminence. 19 For it pleased the Father that in Him should all fulness dwell; 20 And, having made peace through the blood of His cross, by Him to reconcile all things unto Himself; by Him, I say, whether they be things in earth, or things in heaven.
Sounds like Jesus Christ to me. Adam didn't die on the Cross. Amen?
Genesis 5:2 "male and female made He them, and called their name Adam"Wrong again. Adam's personal name comes from the original word for human. You have it backwards.
Not according to Genesis.
No, Adam was created male.
No Adam is a personal name from adam which is a non-personal name.
....
How did you miss the message of the post -big time!
Genesis 5:2 "male and female made He them, and called their name Adam"
The original Hebrew states that "male and female made He them, and called their name Adam...Genesis 5:2The only thing that was big was the amount of errors in it. You firstly need to know the difference between adam and Adam or you will continue to make errors about the Hebrew words.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?