Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Ethics & Morality
Where does morality come from?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Kylie" data-source="post: 74041936" data-attributes="member: 343110"><p>Since you are under the impression that ring species is singular when it is actually plural, it's is obvious that you have no idea what you are talking about, so your claim that there is no evidence is just something you made up. Because if you actually knew one way or the other, you'd have to understand what a ring species is first, and you obviously don't.</p><p></p><p>Have a look at this.</p><p></p><p><img src="https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/8/8d/Ring_species_seagull.svg/532px-Ring_species_seagull.svg.png" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /> </p><p></p><p>Species 1 can breed with species 2.</p><p></p><p>Species 2 can breed with both species 1 and species 3.</p><p></p><p>Species 3 can breed with both species 2 and species 4.</p><p></p><p>And so on, around the ring.</p><p></p><p>Each species is a little more different that the one before it. The differences between two consecutive species are so slight that it's not a barrier to successful interbreeding. But by the time we get all the way around to species 7, it is so different that it can't interbreed with species 1 anymore, even though each species can interbreed with the next species in line.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Kylie, post: 74041936, member: 343110"] Since you are under the impression that ring species is singular when it is actually plural, it's is obvious that you have no idea what you are talking about, so your claim that there is no evidence is just something you made up. Because if you actually knew one way or the other, you'd have to understand what a ring species is first, and you obviously don't. Have a look at this. [IMG]https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/8/8d/Ring_species_seagull.svg/532px-Ring_species_seagull.svg.png[/IMG] Species 1 can breed with species 2. Species 2 can breed with both species 1 and species 3. Species 3 can breed with both species 2 and species 4. And so on, around the ring. Each species is a little more different that the one before it. The differences between two consecutive species are so slight that it's not a barrier to successful interbreeding. But by the time we get all the way around to species 7, it is so different that it can't interbreed with species 1 anymore, even though each species can interbreed with the next species in line. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Ethics & Morality
Where does morality come from?
Top
Bottom