Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Ethics & Morality
Where does morality come from?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Kylie" data-source="post: 74020346" data-attributes="member: 343110"><p>Please. I literally cut and pasted the relevant parts of each article for you, don't give me any nonsense about not having made any argument. And what makes you think that you can demand scientific articles from me when you are utterly incapable of producing the same? I've given you evidence to show that Lucy is transitional on the way to becoming human. Nowe it's time for you to step up to the palt and do the same. Since you place so much regard on scientific articles, you can produce some of those to support your view!</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>The lack of peer reviews suits you just fine when it comes to supporting your view. Where are the anti-evolution peer reviewed articles? Oh, that's right, you can't provide any. Your hypocrisy is glaring.</p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>Of course, you need some ready-made excuse to use when it comes time for you to decide they're wrong because they don't agree with your anti-evolution stance.</p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>Given that you have freely admitted you don't have the qualifications required to correctly interpret those photos, your opinion of them means nothing.</p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>No they can't.</p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>Absolute rubbish. We have<a href="https://www.britannica.com/topic/Australopithecus" target="_blank"> more than 400 specimens of Au Afarensis, and between them we have just about the entire skeleton</a>. You have obviously not done your research on this.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>So the fact they are experts in the field and are far more likely to know what they're actually talking about than you counts for nothing, does it?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Okay, you go right ahead. I'd like to see how many of these scientists are actually in a relevant field. So go on, give me your list of 20 scientists who say that Lucy doesn't count as an example of evolution.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Kylie, post: 74020346, member: 343110"] Please. I literally cut and pasted the relevant parts of each article for you, don't give me any nonsense about not having made any argument. And what makes you think that you can demand scientific articles from me when you are utterly incapable of producing the same? I've given you evidence to show that Lucy is transitional on the way to becoming human. Nowe it's time for you to step up to the palt and do the same. Since you place so much regard on scientific articles, you can produce some of those to support your view! The lack of peer reviews suits you just fine when it comes to supporting your view. Where are the anti-evolution peer reviewed articles? Oh, that's right, you can't provide any. Your hypocrisy is glaring. Of course, you need some ready-made excuse to use when it comes time for you to decide they're wrong because they don't agree with your anti-evolution stance. Given that you have freely admitted you don't have the qualifications required to correctly interpret those photos, your opinion of them means nothing. No they can't. Absolute rubbish. We have[URL='https://www.britannica.com/topic/Australopithecus'] more than 400 specimens of Au Afarensis, and between them we have just about the entire skeleton[/URL]. You have obviously not done your research on this. So the fact they are experts in the field and are far more likely to know what they're actually talking about than you counts for nothing, does it? Okay, you go right ahead. I'd like to see how many of these scientists are actually in a relevant field. So go on, give me your list of 20 scientists who say that Lucy doesn't count as an example of evolution. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Ethics & Morality
Where does morality come from?
Top
Bottom