Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Where did the laws of nature come from?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="stevevw" data-source="post: 70548517" data-attributes="member: 342064"><p>Fair enough. If anything I think I have provided support for most things I have said. That,s all I can do and if you don't want to accept that and dismiss it then I can't do much more about that.</p><p></p><p></p><p>well yes, several times when I made a claim or when I supplied support for something you asked where were the exact words that would match what I was saying from the paper or other sources . You insisted it had to show the exact words and you didn't allow any other adjectives that meant the same things which is only a reasonable thing to do.</p><p></p><p>Every time you claimed I was making stuff up I have provided support for what i have said, just like the last post. But even when I do show you, you end up dismissing it anyway as you have just done so I am beginning to not waste my time going back and searching all the time for the support.</p><p></p><p>Yes you have acknowledged this with and without the word. Either way according to your own logic you are supporting what the paper says by using it to show I am wrong just like I am doing for you. You have to be prepared to be measured by the same standards you want to make others adhere to. But enough of this its been dragging on and taken this debate way off track.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="stevevw, post: 70548517, member: 342064"] Fair enough. If anything I think I have provided support for most things I have said. That,s all I can do and if you don't want to accept that and dismiss it then I can't do much more about that. well yes, several times when I made a claim or when I supplied support for something you asked where were the exact words that would match what I was saying from the paper or other sources . You insisted it had to show the exact words and you didn't allow any other adjectives that meant the same things which is only a reasonable thing to do. Every time you claimed I was making stuff up I have provided support for what i have said, just like the last post. But even when I do show you, you end up dismissing it anyway as you have just done so I am beginning to not waste my time going back and searching all the time for the support. Yes you have acknowledged this with and without the word. Either way according to your own logic you are supporting what the paper says by using it to show I am wrong just like I am doing for you. You have to be prepared to be measured by the same standards you want to make others adhere to. But enough of this its been dragging on and taken this debate way off track. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Where did the laws of nature come from?
Top
Bottom