Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Where did the laws of nature come from?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="stevevw" data-source="post: 70539314" data-attributes="member: 342064"><p>I just did, that's unless you are asking for exact word for word quotes which is ridiculous. People acknowledge things in different ways which amount to the same thing. This is a common form of referencing in academic writing. By you trying to correct me when I was saying selection is negligible, insufficient and has an inability to evolve complex life by saying this only applies to complex situations is acknowledging that selection has inability, insufficiency and is negligible for complexity in life. You said it a number of times in different ways which all amount to the same thing.</p><p></p><p>So when I was saying that at least you were a step closer to acknowledging that there are questions about natural selections ability (inability) my emphasis as that is what I kept emphasizing you stated,</p><p><a href="http://www.christianforums.com/threads/where-did-the-laws-of-nature-come-from.7928975/page-92#post-70208052" target="_blank">Sep 27, 2016</a> <a href="http://www.christianforums.com/threads/where-did-the-laws-of-nature-come-from.7928975/page-92#post-70208052" target="_blank">#1828</a></p><p><strong>KCfromNC said</strong></p><p>In specific categories of evolution. Yes, that's why I said so when you first posted this quote a while back.</p><p></p><p>As you said you had already acknowledged that the specific categories were about complexity in life for which I had posted many times. So here you are restating that you have already acknowledged this.</p><p></p><p>As I stated earlier I thought we would/should have moved on from this you said, he said stuff as the last 10 plus pages have been about silly minor points rather than the debate. (unfortunately I have had to defend myself in this time rather then debate the topic).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="stevevw, post: 70539314, member: 342064"] I just did, that's unless you are asking for exact word for word quotes which is ridiculous. People acknowledge things in different ways which amount to the same thing. This is a common form of referencing in academic writing. By you trying to correct me when I was saying selection is negligible, insufficient and has an inability to evolve complex life by saying this only applies to complex situations is acknowledging that selection has inability, insufficiency and is negligible for complexity in life. You said it a number of times in different ways which all amount to the same thing. So when I was saying that at least you were a step closer to acknowledging that there are questions about natural selections ability (inability) my emphasis as that is what I kept emphasizing you stated, [URL='http://www.christianforums.com/threads/where-did-the-laws-of-nature-come-from.7928975/page-92#post-70208052']Sep 27, 2016[/URL] [URL='http://www.christianforums.com/threads/where-did-the-laws-of-nature-come-from.7928975/page-92#post-70208052']#1828[/URL] [B]KCfromNC said[/B] In specific categories of evolution. Yes, that's why I said so when you first posted this quote a while back. As you said you had already acknowledged that the specific categories were about complexity in life for which I had posted many times. So here you are restating that you have already acknowledged this. As I stated earlier I thought we would/should have moved on from this you said, he said stuff as the last 10 plus pages have been about silly minor points rather than the debate. (unfortunately I have had to defend myself in this time rather then debate the topic). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Where did the laws of nature come from?
Top
Bottom