Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Then show us the EVIDENCE of How and When prehistoric people evolved their Human intelligence. Show us HOW mutations and long periods of time produced the superior intelligence of Humans in the common ancestors of apes. You cannot and that is the reason the False ToE is wrong. Amen?
You refuse to look at the evidence, so why present it?
He asks for 'how' and you respond with meaningless ERVs.
It's all he's got. He ASSUMES that Humans were made exactly like prehistoric people even after I've shown him that Adam, the first Human, was NOT made of flesh and did NOT evolve from the common ancestor of Apes,
but he REJECTS God's Truth in Genesis.
1. You showed me no such thing.
2. You have given me no evidence that they are true.
1. I showed you where Adam, the first Human, was made on the 3rd Day from the DUST of the ground. Gen 2:4-7
2. Sure I did and you were Unable to refute a single one of the Scientific Truths found in Genesis.
I've discovered that.....
1) Evolution is true
and
2) Evolution is false
What sources did you look at in your research? What evidence did you look at?
1. That is a claim, not evidence. Do you understand the difference or not?
2. The lack of pre-integration sites in the human genome for ERV's that are fixed in other primate species refutes your claims.
Those biologists have various views concerning evolution and how humanity was created. The 99% aren't unified as to how humanity was created, for example. Also, you shouldn't label those who believe the evolutionary view of Godless evolution as "losers and idiots", they're not....they're simply embracing their faith-based view of how humanity was created.
You are speaking of the Godless evolutionary creationist, aren't you?
No, you are using an incorrect and overly limited definition of "observe".You've observed a single life form evolve into a human? Your imagination seems to be running wild.
Using loaded terms is dishonest. Humanity evolved and you will find some disagreement on the details, but not much on the process among biologists. You are also being dishonest if you try to argue that those minor disagreements mean that there are different versions of evolution.
Nope, I do not accept arguments with dishonest terms. Christians are supposed to be honest. At least that was how I was raised. It seems in this aspect I am a better "Christian" than you are since I have no need of dishonest techniques.
No, you are using an incorrect and overly limited definition of "observe".
How about from sources that aren't Christian/ID based? Don't worry - when I was ID about 10 years ago I was exactly the same, but it's good to explore a range of views and sites.
A good start might be talkorigins where as well as lots of information you can take part in discussions.
Their FAQ covers a lot of common questions about evolution with links to extra information.
http://www.talkorigins.org/origins/faqs-qa.html
http://www.talkorigins.org/origins/faqs-mustread.html
So you decided to go with the dishonest route. That is the same as you admitting that you are wrong in my book. And no, my claim of 99% of biologists was not misleading in any way. I can post the support again, if you want to claim something else the burden of proof is still upon you.You'll find wide disagreement on the details. One view of evolution has the creation of humanity from only naturalistic mechanisms, another view of evolution has God involved in the creation of humanity. That's a huge difference and results in two very different worldviews. They're not "minor disagreements".
You've once again been caught trying to pass off evolution as a monolithic term when in fact it isn't. It also reveals your claim of '99% of biologists believe in evolution' is very misleading.
Nothing dishonest about the fact that everyone believes Humanity was created by something.
And I guess I need to remind you that I have both supplied evidence and you have shown that you have not clue as to what qualifies as evidence. I can still help you with that disability of yours.You'll certainly have to do something to continue your complete failure to offer observed evidence.
So you decided to go with the dishonest route. That is the same as you admitting that you are wrong in my book. And no, my claim of 99% of biologists was not misleading in any way. I can post the support again, if you want to claim something else the burden of proof is still upon you.
And I guess I need to remind you that I have both supplied evidence and you have shown that you have not clue as to what qualifies as evidence. I can still help you with that disability of yours.
In other words, use sites that you agree with?
You asked me for sources and I gave them to you. What I haven't found is a source which provides evidence, based on the scientific method, for the view that only naturalistic mechanisms produced humanity from a single life form of long ago.
Or one which provides evidence, based on the scientific method, that both a pine tree and elephant was produced from the same life form, only by naturalistic mechanisms.
If you give a link to a multi page site, please quote the area of the site which provides this evidence.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?