- Mar 23, 2004
- 249,102
- 114,198
- Faith
- Non-Denom
- Marital Status
- Private
- Politics
- US-Constitution
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Bill Nye "The Science Guy" assures us that the particular fossils found in the successive layers of sediments, wherever they are found around the earth, do not appear in the previous or later sediment layers. If this is true none of those particular life forms, unique only to those sediment layers, evolved at all, but were destroyed when that period ended.
So, if evolution did occur to those species it must have occurred during the very brief period between those time frames, for which there is no fossil evidence. And the change would have been quite drastic.
Or, if evolution did occur during the forming of those layers the evolved species within all perished when that period abruptly ended, thus interrupting the whole evolutionary process.
So, if everything perished in the previous layer, what was left to evolve in succeeding layers?
Exactly, Genesis 1 concerns the creation of the universe and the way life unfolds with man (neanderthal and those that arose prior). Genesis 2 goes over that creation narrative culminating in the spiritual birth of modern man. It is interesting to note that there is a very distinct time where spirituality and human man appear in the fossil evidence.Hmm... Interesting point. A lovely way to explain that little 'discrepancy' in the Bible which scholars say is due to different authors.
I have long understood that neanderthal man (or dust-man as you describe) is not God's chosen man, but that later man is the one with the mark of God and line of Shem.
Either way, man was not evolved from animals.
Ok. So you are not referring to the first reproducing cell then...I thought you said you were.When you look in a mirror, you are looking at an imperfect replicator that competes for limited resources. That's the evidence.
None. Because it does not exist.
Ok. So you are not referring to the first reproducing cell then...
I thought you said you were.
Eh, you can think what you want. Men wrote it and I have no problem with that. If you do that is your view and held by a minority.Your empty assertions doesn't change who wrote it. If you want to make a book into your god, then go for it.
Eh, you can think what you want. Men wrote it and I have no problem with that. If you do that is your view and held by a minority.
Exactly, Genesis 1 concerns the creation of the universe and the way life unfolds with man (neanderthal and those that arose prior). Genesis 2 goes over that creation narrative culminating in the spiritual birth of modern man. It is interesting to note that there is a very distinct time where spirituality and human man appear in the fossil evidence.
Hmm... Interesting point. A lovely way to explain that little 'discrepancy' in the Bible which scholars say is due to different authors.
I have long understood that neanderthal man (or dust-man as you describe) is not God's chosen man, but that later man is the one with the mark of God and line of Shem.
Either way, man was not evolved from animals.
No, I am not. The requirement for evolution is an imperfect replicator that competes for limited resources. THAT'S IT. If there were multiple origins of life or a single one, either natural or supernatural, the same definition applies.
You really need to improve your reading comprehension. I never said anything of the like.
Yes, man was created on day six. I just don't think we can determine the length of a day. I know that there are those that believe it is a literal day, but God said that the sun, moon and stars were created to determine a day and night so before they were created there was no demarcation of the day. So I interpret the Genesis Narrative very much as an Old Earth Creationist. I don't think any interpretation to be actually wrong since we don't have a good idea how much time is actually represented in the Narrative. I just happen to think Genesis fits well with the fossil record excluding the absence of evidence for plants coming prior to life in the Cambrian. I believe there were plants prior but there is no evidence that supports that as of yet but the oxygen in the atmosphere very early points to that being a strong possibility.Okay.
Genesis 2 is where Yahweh (Yeshua) is first fully revealed as well. As breathing life into man. I like the symbolism you illustrate as to this being born again unto Jesus Christ.
Holy man was still created on Day 6 though. Don't you think? Or is this why God did not regard the creation of man as 'joyful and good'???
The fact that the process of evolution has given man a way to explain (to some degree) life without God does not mean that evolution as defined as genetic change in a population does not happen. Materialists just have placed their belief on a natural process (the Created) rather than on the Creator.It's not a discrepancy in the Bible but in the traditional religious story of the creation by ancient men. it's what they believed but it is NOT what the Supreme Intelligence of Creation wrote. God has an interesting way to hide His Truth and assure that ONLY by Faith can one be saved. He reveals His secret to Daniel:
Dan 12:4 But thou, O Daniel, shut up the words, and seal the book, even to the time of the end: many shall run to and fro, and knowledge shall be increased.
As mankind's knowledge increases, God's Truth, which only God could have written in Genesis, becomes more understandable. This knowledge will soon PROVE that the False ToE is nothing more than the fantasies of men who have REJECTED God's Truth in Genesis. ll Peter 3:3-7 The fact that God's Truth is finally being understood shows that it is the "time of the end". Amen?
It's not a discrepancy in the Bible but in the traditional religious story of the creation by ancient men. it's what they believed but it is NOT what the Supreme Intelligence of Creation wrote. God has an interesting way to hide His Truth and assure that ONLY by Faith can one be saved. He reveals His secret to Daniel:
Dan 12:4 But thou, O Daniel, shut up the words, and seal the book, even to the time of the end: many shall run to and fro, and knowledge shall be increased.
As mankind's knowledge increases, God's Truth, which only God could have written in Genesis, becomes more understandable. This knowledge will soon PROVE that the False ToE is nothing more than the fantasies of men who have REJECTED God's Truth in Genesis. ll Peter 3:3-7 The fact that God's Truth is finally being understood shows that it is the "time of the end". Amen?
What evidence we have are for complex replicating organisms from the get go. It is as simple as that.
well I think the whole thing started with Darwin and then it just happened and everyone had their evolution glasses on .Bill Nye "The Science Guy" assures us that the particular fossils found in the successive layers of sediments, wherever they are found around the earth, do not appear in the previous or later sediment layers. If this is true none of those particular life forms, unique only to those sediment layers, evolved at all, but were destroyed when that period ended.
So, if evolution did occur to those species it must have occurred during the very brief period between those time frames, for which there is no fossil evidence. And the change would have been quite drastic.
Or, if evolution did occur during the forming of those layers the evolved species within all perished when that period abruptly ended, thus interrupting the whole evolutionary process.
So, if everything perished in the previous layer, what was left to evolve in succeeding layers?
That's because the geologic record itself abruptly stops and has large gaps. Deposition of sediments is not constant or continuous, so why would the fossil record be constant and continuous?
http://www.gallup.com/poll/170834/three-four-bible-word-god.aspx This is evidence that here in the US three out of four people believe God inspired the Bible.Based on what evidence?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?