What are the major differences between anabaptists and baptists? Just simple answers if you would please.
Thanks.
Thanks.Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Thanks.Baptist----------------------------------------- Anabaptist
Calvinist ---------------------------------------Arminian
Total Depravity ------------------------------Man can make a decision for God
Unconditional Election ---------------------Open to all based on faith
Limited Atonement --------------------------Jesus died for all, not the just few
Irresistable Grace ----------------------------Can reject Jesus' calling
preservation of the saints -----------------Loss of salvation possible
ok to kill as agent of state -----------------non-resistant (pacifist)
This is all I can think of off the top of my head, maybe someone else can add to the list. I would say that Anabaptists are much closer theologically to Methodists or Penticostals than they are to Baptists.
What are the major differences between anabaptists and baptists? Just simple answers if you would please.Thanks.
I don't want to debate, but I do have a few questions.
1. Do Anabaptists believe man can choose God without God first calling them?
2. Can you give me some scripture that is basis for believing that salvation can be lost?
Thanks for your help.
It does all seem very confusing at times. I guess that's why I don't really follow any type of systematic theology. To me, it is as simple as those who believe will be saved and those who don't will be eternally punished. The evidence of salvation is brought forth in a person's life.
One question though:
What would be the fate of a man who would be on his death bed and come to the conclusion that he needs Christ to forgive him his sins and redeem his soul?
Must he work to gain that salvation or is it by faith? I don't understand how it can be both. It's either by faith in Christ alone which brings about works, or it is faith plus works. Which is it?
Why can't we just judge by the fruit of the tree?
It is best described (when working correctly) as faith in action, going about doing the work of the Kingdom of God. What counts is what is done, not what is talked about.
I like that...I wish there were Anabaptists in the area.There are Mennonites but they are extremely conservative, the ladies wear the little hats with bobbi pins.
On the death bed, it is pretty hard to see the fruit. God knows the heart of a man and how he would live his life if the deathbed were not present. Salvation is not fire insurance. I wouldn't want to wait until I am on my deathbed to accept him.
It helps for me to view faith as belief in action. You can believe a life preserver will save your life, but it is not faith until you jump off the boat.
Ok, but what about the question?
Is it faith alone in Christ for salvation while the works show evidence of that fact?
Is it faith plus works as the only way to salvation?
So when does acceptance become salvation? Is it only when our faith begins to work or is it upon confessing our sin and accepting Jesus Christ as Savior?
It can't be both. It has to be one or the other.