Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Evolution does not work. What possibility is left?
My training and experience on science.Then what makes you think that you are qualified enough to say that evolution is wrong?
Then why say it if you're not going to give the evidence then? Are you just doing it so you can get attention?
You made a claim about a specific scientific paper. If you can't provide a citation and discussion of its content and context, then my only presumption left is that you must have made the claim up. And and I previously stated, even if the two bones were unrelated it does not invalidate ToE in the least. You still have not provide scientific evidence for things popping into existence in the fossil record.
You made a claim about a specific scientific paper. If you can't provide a citation and discussion of its content and context, then my only presumption left is that you must have made the claim up. And and I previously stated, even if the two bones were unrelated it does not invalidate ToE in the least. You still have not provide scientific evidence for things popping into existence in the fossil record.
I've seen this before: guy who's expert in field X thinks that gives him the skills to demolish all the experts in field Y.My training and experience on science.
My training and experience on science.
What I can do it to defeat your evidence.
Then one can not claim that it support ToE.
No I did not.
For example, a paper showed two similar bones, and said one evolved into another.
What kind of evidence is that? It is not scientific at all.
I've seen this before: guy who's expert in field X thinks that gives him the skills to demolish all the experts in field Y.
Yeah. Apart from the fact that, over the few years that I've seen you on this forum, you have actually yet to demonstrate that you have any training and experience in science.
Again: the Dunning-Kruger effect in action.
Yes you did. Post 299.
What paper? Furthermore, the way you state it is not what evolution describes. Populations evolve, not individuals.
Yes you did. Post 299.
Very simple. Try me.
I don't have to. Your posts in this thread, your refusal to show evidence when asked, show that you are just blustering and posturing. Nothing more, nothing less.
No I did not specify any.
For example, a paper showed two similar bones, and said one evolved into another.
So you don't.
I did not specify any particular one.Yes, you did. You said:
I've done more than you have in this thread. At least I'm not pretending that I'm someone's intellectual superior by saying that I'm 'teaching' them, when in actuality what I'd be doing would get me fired from any self-respecting school.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?