Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
The second choice (13,770,000,000 BC) is a nod to cosmic evolution, which has been compartmentalized into seven different stages of evolution:The principle of evolution can be applied beyond just biological systems.
You are well aware that Hovinds interpretations are fringe even among Creationists... if you want to use his version of tbe word "Evolution" then you should have stayed it specifically.The second choice (13,770,000,000 BC) is a nod to cosmic evolution, which has been compartmentalized into seven different stages of evolution:
All that response demonstrates, is a massive lack of conceptual understanding of the principles for that which you expect there to be 'a start date'.The second choice (13,770,000,000 BC) is a nod to cosmic evolution, which has been compartmentalized into seven different stages of evolution:
Maybe ... but I would agree that its just playing with semantics in order to generate nothing more than word salad!Playing semantic games is dishonest and beneath you.
This is from Eric Chaisson, not Kent Hovind.You are well aware that Hovinds interpretations are fringe even among Creationists... if you want to use his version of tbe word "Evolution" then you should have stayed it specifically.
Playing semantic games is dishonest and beneath you.
Eric J. Chaisson is an American astrophysicist known for his research, teaching, and writing on the interdisciplinary science of cosmic evolution. He is a member of the Center for Astrophysics | Harvard & Smithsonian, teaches natural science at Harvard University and is an elected Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science.
Take it up with the "elected fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science."All that response demonstrates, is a massive lack of conceptual understanding of the principles for that which you expect there to be 'a start date'.
Keep posting, chief.Maybe ... but I would agree that its just playing with semantics in order to generate nothing more than word salad!
The 'vote' count in such games is worthless (and using that to make some self-satisfying moot point, is manipulative of those who voted with honest intent).
Hindu Creationists would not agree.Well my friend I want to say evolution really isn’t the truth.The truth lies in Genesis,Every creature,beast,and crawling thing on earth was created by Gods almighty hands.Plus If you think very very hard,an empty vast nothing-void can’t create anything.When I say empty I mean exactly that; empty (no molecules,matter,light,sound,temperature,gravity,zero-Gravity,pressure) literally the space for any matter to exist in wasnt even there,and starting with this nothing cannot,again CANNOT create something,there HAS to be an eternal cause.For crying out loud the recently launched James Webb telescope proved hawkings theory of the Big Bang(which he stole from and profited off of the Good Dutch Christian Georges Lemaître) WRONG.Not even that but if a massive explosion did happen,no life would exist because non living matter cannot become animate and grow limbs and crawl out of water over billions of years.I as a Christian can’t even wrap my head around the concept that monkeys became humans.It makes no sense.
My dearest friend I say this because Our answer lies in Genesis,the Lords word is true and breathed.He can be trusted, and we also are warned about having wisdom from him and the world,this is known as double-mindedness as our brother James once told us in his account in the Bible.My answer is Other,and that other is Genesis.
I see our answer as sitting within this Creation itSelf. Creation can not lie. And it tells a very different story than does the Genesis creation story. Putting on my Lover of God hat, I put my faith in what God has created and signed off with His signature.My dearest friend I say this because Our answer lies in Genesis,the Lords word is true and breathed.He can be trusted, and we also are warned about having wisdom from him and the world,this is known as double-mindedness as our brother James once told us in his account in the Bible.My answer is Other,and that other is Genesis.
Ditto for the Hindu story?Creation can not lie. And it tells a very different story than does the Genesis creation story.
Well I’m not a Hindu,I’m a devout Christian.As a matter of fact that you speak of Hinduism,it’s among one of the most broken (false)religions in the world.It’s do badly broken that it recognizes 320,000,000 different Gods,it’s a pantheistic belief system with no formal structure.Hindu Creationists would not agree.
According to Hindu creationists all species on earth including humans have "devolved" or come down from a high state of pure consciousness (Brahman). Hindu creationists claim that species of plants and animals are material forms adopted by pure consciousness which live an endless cycle of births and rebirths.[8] Ronald Numbers says that: "Hindu Creationists have insisted on the antiquity of humans, who they believe appeared fully formed as long, perhaps, as trillions of years ago."[9] Hindu creationism is a form of old earth creationism. According to Hindu creationists the universe may even be older than billions of years. These views are based on the Vedas, which depict an extreme antiquity of the universe and history of the earth.[10][11]Source: Hindu views on evolution
So creation tells you "a very different story" about Genesis, but seems to be a little silent on the Hindu version?Ditto for the Hindu story?
Interesting. Must the reality of God in ones' life require a "formal structure"?Well I’m not a Hindu,I’m a devout Christian.As a matter of fact that you speak of Hinduism,it’s among one of the most broken (false)religions in the world.It’s do badly broken that it recognizes 320,000,000 different Gods,it’s a pantheistic belief system with no formal structure.
I'm not familiar with the Hindu story of Creation, so have not developed any opinion. I suspect that particular Hindu story of Creation is not the only one floating out there.Ditto for the Hindu story?
You're just demonstrating that you know virtually nothing about Hinduism. Your assumption that your inadequate understanding of a different religion is a killer argument is more a critique of you than of Hinduism.Well I’m not a Hindu,I’m a devout Christian.As a matter of fact that you speak of Hinduism,it’s among one of the most broken (false)religions in the world.It’s do badly broken that it recognizes 320,000,000 different Gods,it’s a pantheistic belief system with no formal structure.
So the fact that the Hindu story has us in a state of de-evolution, but God's creation tells you we are in a state of evolutionary progress, you have not developed any opinion???I'm not familiar with the Hindu story of Creation, so have not developed any opinion.
Buddhism was formed as a breakaway religion from Hindu's extremely oppressive caste system, in which society was locked into ways of life they didn't agree with.You're just demonstrating that you know virtually nothing about Hinduism.
And God help the ones who were considered the UNTOUCHABLES.
But atheists seem to revere Hinduism over Christianity,
They prefer Islam's convert-or-die religion
Good! Are they Christians?My friend Ajit and his family are helping them.
Actually I worded that wrong.essentialsaltes said:You're imagining things.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?