Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I am an atheist, have been an atheist for decades and do not see anything that will change that in the forseeable future.
And I still do not explicitly disavow the possibility of a deity.
Fathom that!
I am not stalling. I just don't know what kind of answer you are looking for.Well.... I believe in Crystal Light. (Because I believe in me!)
Okey Dokey: Does this "something" pertain to the nature of existence/reality? (And really, it would be a lot easier if you would volunteer info, rather than have it extracted with dental equipment. C'mon, open up! I promise, I won't bite.)
Because I admit the possibility of a deity. I just don't believe in (the existence of) one.I'm trying to, I'm trying to!
Why don't you explicitly disavow the possibility of a deity?
I am not stalling. I just don't know what kind of answer you are looking for.
"What do you believe in?".... what the heck does that even mean? I gave you some examples what it could mean... and you discarded them as "red herrings".
I admit that this might be a problem of different languages... but I would have a similar problem with such a unspecific question in my native german.
Most of the former atheists I've met think that way.... they're not suddenly buying Bibles or going to Church, but SOMETHING happened in their lives, and now they can no longer explicitly disavow the possibility of a Deity.
It's like a door that's a little cracked open....
Because I admit the possibility of a deity. I just don't believe in (the existence of) one.
It consider it unreasonable and impropable. But I admit that my reasonings might be incorrect or based on faulty premises and that my evaluations might just be off.
But as long as I do not have a reason to consider my reasonings incorrect, or to consider different premises or different evaluations, I have no reason to change my disbelief.
Basically, yes. The concept of "God" can be removed so far from logic and reasoning that it becomes impossible to disprove it. But "not disproven" does not provide any reasons to accept it.If you don't mind me asking, why do you admit to the possibility of a Deity? Is it just one of those "well, for all we know the universe could be a Matrix simulation, or something out of Marvel, so sure, a God is possible" things?
You've got to be kidding me...
His English is impeccable! He understood you were asking a question, he just wanted you to specify.
Uh... he was the one who said that his language might be an issue. Not the other way. But thanks for playing ref, it was really helpful. God bless.
Again: We're talking about what do you believe in. That's ridiculously straightforward: If you claim to be an atheist, but state that you believe in SOMETHING regarding the true nature of existence/reality.... then what is it? What do you believe in?
I've been reading this new book (The Second Coming: A Love Story by Scott Pinsker) that makes the opposite argument. Basically, it says that mankind is only a few generations removed from the hacksaw & leaches. Right? By science's own admission, about 93% of the entire universe is a total mystery (Dark Matter & Dark Energy). We don't even know what it is or how to define it!! So if we've only been examining the 7% of the "known" universe for a few generations, don't have a clue about 93% of it..... then wouldn't it be kinda silly to conclude that God cannot exist???But atheism IS actually reasonable "rational intellectual" belief. Faith is not gained by being able to explain God to oneself or vice versa. The bible makes it pretty clear that God requires we suspend our disbelief and enter into the kingdom as a "little child"...this is not rational or easily explained away with thinking.
Ah, so you do specify: "something regarding the true nature of existence/reality"Uh... he was the one who said that his language might be an issue. Not the other way. But thanks for playing ref, it was really helpful. God bless.
Again: We're talking about what do you believe in. That's ridiculously straightforward: If you claim to be an atheist, but state that you believe in SOMETHING regarding the true nature of existence/reality.... then what is it? What do you believe in?
If you're asking an atheist what he thinks the source of reality/existence/the universe etc. is, you will probably get somewhat different answers depending on the atheist. Bear in mind that, with this particular question, "I don't know" is a valid answer (and is not the same as saying "nothing").
I've been reading this new book (The Second Coming: A Love Story by Scott Pinsker) that makes the opposite argument. Basically, it says that mankind is only a few generations removed from the hacksaw & leaches. Right? By science's own admission, about 93% of the entire universe is a total mystery (Dark Matter & Dark Energy). We don't even know what it is or how to define it!! So if we've only been examining the 7% of the "known" universe for a few generations, don't have a clue about 93% of it..... then wouldn't it be kinda silly to conclude that God cannot exist???
Just going by science's own data, it seems like -- at best -- a scientist's conclusion should be: Gosh, we need a lot more evidence before we make a conclusion!
Ah, so you do specify: "something regarding the true nature of existence/reality"
Well, I believe that reality is real, and it is the only real thing there is. That excludes most concepts of deities that adhere to a prescriptive morality, which is per definitionem irreal.
But you just said earlier that "God" is just as likely (or in the same vein as likely) as a false, Matrix simulated reality?
How does this jibe with "reality is real"?
Perception and description of reality is not reality itself.
A matrix simulated reality would be just that... a matrix simulated reality. It would be real: we would just describe it incorrectly. Just as we incorrectly describe this reality.
This is one of the instances where "I don't know" is a good and valid answer.What, then, is the reality of our reality?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?