Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Still waiting for a creationist to address the topic.
If someone is going to claim that the evidence supports a recent global flood then they must also be prepared to show how a recent global flood is falsifiable. IOW, if any possible observation supports the flood, then no observation supports the flood. The flood needs to be falsifiable in order for people to claim that they have evidence that supports it.
Therefore, the question is simple and mainly aimed at YEC's who claim that a recent global flood is supported by the evidence. What features would a geologic feature need in order to falsify a recent global flood?
Will you answer my T. roseae question? Did Shubin effectively use ToE to predict and discover an unknown tetrapod, or was he just lucky?
They would have both features because both activities took place and we see those features. What you are asking is idiotic.
I would say he was just lucky. He accidentally saw the skull sticking out a cliff. Not where they were digging. Maybe he just made up the rest so it sounded good to the press. You were not there, I was not there.
Besides, similarities proves nothing other than....similarities.
They would have both features because both activities took place and we see those features. What you are asking is idiotic.
I would say he was just lucky. He accidentally saw the skull sticking out a cliff. Not where they were digging. Maybe he just made up the rest so it sounded good to the press. You were not there, I was not there.
Besides, similarities proves nothing other than....similarities.
I would say he was just lucky. He accidentally saw the skull sticking out a cliff. Not where they were digging. Maybe he just made up the rest so it sounded good to the press. You were not there, I was not there.
Besides, similarities proves nothing other than....similarities.
Wrong.... again.
Your ignorance, coupled with a massive dose of theocentric arrogance is second to none. Kudos.
Dr. Shubin's discovery is a rock solid example of using the predictive quality of a robust theory to determine where we should find a 375myo transitional tetrapod, and he did! This is how science works, and there are thousands of similar examples of this. To be a creationist is to deliberately ignore the facts and choosing to be "dumb on purpose."
He used the fact that fossils of a certain kind are found certain places.
Further it is not a transitional species.
It is a created kind with similar features of all the rest of the created kind by one designer
He didn't use the theory.
Then they found it in a cliff wall, not where they were digging.
Further it is not a transitional species.
He didn't use the theory. He used the fact that fossils of a certain kind are found certain places. Then they found it in a cliff wall, not where they were digging. Further it is not a transitional species. It is a created kind with similar features of all the rest of the created kind by one designer using the same blueprints of what works best for organic life.
Tiktaalik had a neck, for crying out loud.
A neck!
I have just noticed your post count, what's the story behind that?
I have just noticed your post count, what's the story behind that?
... It keeps going up!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?