Archaeopteryx
Wanderer
Go on...
I'm not sure what you're getting at here. The fossil record is one line of evidence supporting evolution.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I don't believe you. I can disprove evolution in one step.
Darwin suggests that all life started as single celled organism and them slowly evolved into all the species we know and love today.
Correct?
If that were true, we would expect to see a fossil record that shows this. One-two- three, etc, millions. Right?
Why then do the oldest fossil records show the complete opposite? If you're really open to evidence, start doing your research. The information is out there.
After that, try to explain the evolution of a giraffe.
I am talking about how evolutionists can also have a degree of faith in what they believe. They will promote the consensus of opinion without really having solid backup because they believe its true no matter what.
you want fossils of single celled organisms? not sure if this is what you mean but i did find something.Stromatolite - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. i don't understand how giraffe's confuse you. the ones with the longer necks reached the food and lived, those with traits with shorter necks died. Giraffe - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. i hope i understood you correctly i had a few drinks today.I don't believe you. I can disprove evolution in one step.
Darwin suggests that all life started as single celled organism and them slowly evolved into all the species we know and love today.
Correct?
If that were true, we would expect to see a fossil record that shows this. One-two- three, etc, millions. Right?
Why then do the oldest fossil records show the complete opposite? If you're really open to evidence, start doing your research. The information is out there.
After that, try to explain the evolution of a giraffe.
Oh my. Are you Confucius now? Are you really an atheist trying to make Christians look stupid?! What's with you dude?
You should stick to God is Love and be loving to others. Don't start condemning people because you have no idea what you're talking about.
You are wrong to promote fear in God. Do you fear love! Can you even hear yourself typing?
Yesyoushould,
If you truly believe in Love you need to check yourself. You are hurting us Christians with you're meaningless rhetoric and unfounded opinions. If you can't have a serious conversation about God, you shouldn't be posting here.
The crap you're spewing only turns people away from God. You answer questions with nonsense rambling and random scripture. You are embarrassing me and yourself. Leave the theological discussions to people that can handle them. You are obviously out of your league.
hey man why you gotta bro beat on him?Yesyoushould,
If you truly believe in Love you need to check yourself. You are hurting us Christians with you're meaningless rhetoric and unfounded opinions. If you can't have a serious conversation about God, you shouldn't be posting here.
The crap you're spewing only turns people away from God. You answer questions with nonsense rambling and random scripture. You are embarrassing me and yourself. Leave the theological discussions to people that can handle them. You are obviously out of your league.
I will no longer respond to your posts as it is just a waste of time, but let me leave you with this,
Your posts cast a negative light on all Christians. If you truly care, you will stick to the basics and stop professing knowledge that you do not posess.
Truly, I hope you can find clarity, you are in great need. May your life be full of happiness and Love.
Responding to evolution arguments,
First, the fossil record shows a plethora of life as far back as we have gone. More life infact than exists today. The fossil record shows a steady decline in species not a steady increase.
Not single celled organisms per say, but how about even small ecosystems of similar creatures. Or a record that shows fewer species than exists today.
Did you know the evidence of the Big Bang was retracted by the same scientists that suggested it.
The giraffe along with many other species of animals do not fit onto your theory of evolution. If you knew the biology of the giraffe this would be easier but in short,
The giraffe could not have evolved. It's circulatory system is very complex and could not function without All of the parts working together. If giraffes evolved then the first ones heads exploded the first time they ate from the ground.
There are many examples of this in science if you simply look for them. I will compile a list if you'd like. But my point is this, if one creature does not fit into evolution, then the THEORY is flawed. Belief in evolution is a leap of faith.
No offense Love, but you aren't exactly making a whole lot of sense either...
God is love? Tell me how that works...
Love is an emotion...are emotions sentient beings? Who is hate then? Who is apathy? How do feelings create universes? Why would i need Jesus or christianity if I've already got love?
Once you answer those questions I've got another two dozen or so surrounding this "god is love" business.
What gives you the authority to pontificate on what theological discussions people can and can't have?
I don't believe you. I can disprove evolution in one step.
Darwin suggests that all life started as single celled organism and them slowly evolved into all the species we know and love today.
Correct?
If that were true, we would expect to see a fossil record that shows this. One-two- three, etc, millions. Right?
Why then do the oldest fossil records show the complete opposite? If you're really open to evidence, start doing your research. The information is out there.
After that, try to explain the evolution of a giraffe.
From the top,
If you believe in Christ and the bible then all I need to say is that Jesus said, "God is love".
Yes, you experience Love as an emotion. That emotion is provided by (is) the Spirit of God. If you have Love in your heart and you live by that love then you already know God and Jesus. The bible is good then for wisdom just as good as the Quran or any other scripture. Good thing to have but unnecessary for salvation.
Do you disagree that Love is the most powerful force in the universe? Is not love in everything and everyone. (Omnipresent, omnipotent)
This shouldn't be a stretch for Christians.
Read the last few pages of posts from this member and maybe you will understand my frustration. I truly feel like he's pretending to be a Christian to promote confusion. I am no better for my beliefs but I'm also not going around telling people that believe or be damned. That's a terrible sentiment and is totally opposed to the fundamentals of Christianity. I said what I said to my brethern because I believe it needed to be said. I stand by it.
I'm not following your argument. How does the number of species extant today refute evolution?
What does the Big Bang have to do with evidence for evolution? Your argument is all over the place.
What? That doesn't even make sense.
Given that you are no better for your beliefs, and you admit that, it would seem that you have no authority to tell someone whether they may or may not promote a certain theological position.
Before we go any further can you tell me what the solid backup is for evolution.First, "evolutionists" do have solid backup, which is why faith isn't required. Second, we don't believe in evolution "no matter what." If the evidence were to turn against it, we would reconsider it.
I don't believe in god or Christ... but it's nice to know I'll get into heaven if I'm wrong.
No, I don't think I'd say love is the most powerful force in the universe. I'd guess entropy or maybe gravity... but I've only thought of it for maybe a few seconds before writing this.
I am in agreement with this member. If he allows, I will let him respond to the issues of evolution on my behalf. He is obviously better versed than I am.Before we go any further can you tell me what the solid backup is for evolution.
And no many scientists dont turn against new evidence. They hold onto their older beliefs and dont want to acknowledge the new evidence that has casts doubts on the theory they hold. They will even falsify results so that it supports their beliefs. Because they have bias towards evolution they will also interpret everything towards that bias. You only have to look at all the climate change data out there which is contradicting itself all the time to see that there are two different sets of scientists both claiming they have all the facts and both saying they are correct to know that they both cant be right. The same thing happens with evolution.
But now even more so it is being disputed and evidence is showing that the traditional view of evolution that Darwin promoted is in doubt. The problem is many of the old school evolutionists dont want to even entertain the thought that they are wrong. Just like religion it often takes a long time and many bits of evidence to finally convince them to change and see the light that they were wrong and move with the times.
The problem begins with the publics rising expectations of science. Being human, scientists are tempted to show that they know more than they do. The number of investigatorsand the number of experiments, observations and analyses they producehas also increased exponentially in many fields, but adequate safeguards against bias are lacking. Research is fragmented, competition is fierce and emphasis is often given to single studies instead of the big picture. Much research is conducted for reasons other than the pursuit of truth. Conflicts of interest abound, and they influence outcomes.
I wont even begin to list all the evidence that can show how Darwinian evolution is in doubt and not fact until you show me what you think is fact with evolution.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?