- Jun 18, 2006
- 3,855,653
- 52,517
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
'Theories' don't do this:
I don't reject the fact that Thalidomide causes birth defects.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
'Theories' don't do this:So do you reject the scientific theory that thalidomide causes birth defects?
You need to get out more.
Speculations that become a belief.
Well then you go ahead and explain the human ancestry fossil evidence that all looks the same.
You see you simply and absolutely cannot defend your science. You lot will aside on any point and nit pick as if you may be having something to say. Indeed you do not. The huge sexual dimorphism found in homo erectus as well as teeth erruption being similar to wild chimps is simply additional support and not the point per se.
The point is
1.You cannot explain why the fossil evidence did support ancestry to a chimp-like creature and now ancestry to a creature nothing like a chimp.
2. You cannot articulate what an intermediate should look like
3. You cannot explain why Ardi, Homo Habils and Turkana Boy, as well as many other skulls all look the same, with no more variation than we see in race or breed.
You evolutonists woffle on continually about the great fossil evidence you have for human ancestry. When it comes down to it you cannot defend your science.
'Theories' don't do this:
I don't reject the fact that Thalidomide causes birth defects.
And neither does thalidomide if you reject scientific theories.
It isn't a fact. It is a theory.
Fair enough -- hypotheses don't do this:Actually I think an hypothesis would be a better description.
Remember, in science a flawed theory can also be supported by a wealth of evidence.
It is this so-called intermediate human that is disgusting and offensive:
Because it is programmed to do that?And WHY does thalidomide do that, AV?
Reality can take a hike.Reality should take peoples' feelings into consideration!
Because it is programmed to do that?
I'll say NO to that, and clarify it by saying BY NATURAL MEANS.Does Thalidomide accomplish its effects by using scientific means?
I'll say NO to that, and clarify it by saying BY NATURAL MEANS.
Make this #4 --Please define the difference between "natural means" and "scientific means".
Stop! You are not addressing what I posted. I caught you in a quote mine misrepresenting a specific study you cited and provided a link. The study did not support any of your accusations. In fact it supported just the opposite. My hope is that you are only unknowingly posting incorrect information because you either do not understand the science behind it, or have not taken the time to examine it thoroughly and unbiased. Conversely, deliberately posting a quote mine is dishonest. I do hope you do not fall in the latter.
Actually this is fine as you lot believe a living factory poofed into existence by itself, something evolutionists like to hand wave away.
I believe an almighty God can 'poof'. You believe dead non living matter can 'poof'. I still see myself as having the upper hand.
And here's the thing: G-d "poofing" would look exactly like inorganic matter poofing. Science merely observes the hand of God
The Bible doesn't say that.the Bible says that whales came before the land animals that they evolved from.
Or science and the Bible are right, and you are wrong.Either science or the Bible is wrong
Make this #4 --
There's the evolution theory where present lifeforms evolved from prehistoric lifeforms, and there's the evolution theory where present lifeforms did not evolve from prehistoric lifeforms.I have been out there. All my old text books only teach on theory of evolution and when I was teaching, I only taught one theory of evolution. I think its only creationists who think there are multiple theories.
I know that. That's why I said a "scientific" theory is speculations that become a belief.That would be 100% wrong. Understand I am talking about a "scientific" theory. It is quite different from the layman's dictionary definition.
That's unfortunate.In science a theory is as good as it gets. There is no hierarchy in science above that of a theory.
Really? So we fall down because of a theory? :oGravity is a theory.
In that case, I reject your theory in favor of my own theory.Theories contain facts, empirical data and observable phenomena that are quantifiable. They are also able to make predictions utilizing the knowledge base of the theory.
Yes.Does that help your misunderstanding?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?