Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
so if i say 1+ 1 + 1 =3 is truth i'm really saying 1 + 1 + 1 = 3 is Jesus Christ. or if i say what you say is true, I'm really saying what you say is Jesus Christ. or if someone says "the truth of the matter is that you are wrong." that person is really saying "" the Jesus christ of the matter is that you are wrong." you have gone into the realm of the absurd with this one.In Christianity truth is not a philosophical concept nor is it a theory, a teaching, or a system; but rather, it is the living theanthropic hypostasis - the historical Jesus Christ. Before Christ men could only conjecture about the Truth since they did not possess it. With Christ as the incarnate divine Logos the eternally complete divine Truth enters into the world. For this reason the Gospel says: 'Truth came by Jesus Christ'
- Justin Popovich
sure but I could read the Bhagvadgita and possibly have the same feeling, or the Qur'an or the Tao Te Ching, do you see my point yet?I encourage you that if you really want to know why God is the true God, then read the bible. No amount of discussion is going to prove to you anything, until you allow yourself to sit down and get to reading His word. Go ahead and read the Tanakh (the Torah-which are the first five books of Moses are included in the Tanakh--it is our Old Testament) and then go ahead and read the New Testament.
If you seek, then you will find. If you have it in your heart to seek and know, then go ahead and read it with an open and pure heart.
sure but I could read the Bhagvadgita and possibly have the same feeling, or the Qur'an or the Tao Te Ching, do you see my point yet?
To be honest, that's a horrible reason to decide if something is true or not.But the question is, have you read the Bhagvadgita, or the Qur'an or the Tao Te Ching to know if you get the same feelings from each?
To be honest, that's a horrible reason to decide if something is true or not.
You should listen to what the Bible says, instead of unBiblically telling people to "follow their feelings."
The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked; who can know it? -Jer. 17:9
I say the verses you quoted are personifications and not literal. I'm not brainwashed cause I believe a verse contains personifications. your point was that you got mad cause I said personification.I was saying that while the Bible is imperfect, it is still the best tool to live by.
Maybe my point was lost in translation?
I get angry because of Christians being too brainwashed to accept that the Bible doesn't have to be perfect for God to be perfect.
How does something being personified, metaphorical, figurative, allegorical and parables prove that it is fallible? All of those requires you to look at the overall message and see if the message is true.Christians have been brainwashed with the doctrine of Biblical infallibilty since the council of Nicea. That is the brainwashing I am referring to.
The frustration I have is that you have to make excuses for it's inherent fallibility such as defining portions as literal, personify, metaphorical, etc. There is no need to makes these excuses if you just accept it's fallibilty.
Non-believers try to say God doesn't exist and then back it up by saying the Bible has errors. That entire argument becomes a farce if you ignore the man made concept of Biblical infallibility.
The Bible doesn't have to be perfect for God to be real and perfect himself. Everyone knows that the Bible is just the word of God written down by inspired men.
Christians have been brainwashed with the doctrine of Biblical infallibilty since the council of Nicea. That is the brainwashing I am referring to.
The frustration I have is that you have to make excuses for it's inherent fallibility such as defining portions as literal, personify, metaphorical, etc. There is no need to makes these excuses if you just accept it's fallibilty.
It becomes a farce if you interpret the bible correctly and shnow htem there are no errors in the b ible. the only errors that exist are man made ones, and there are numerous ones of those in there. people, christians, who say 3 is one and 3 is one is no contradiction are the ones fueling the belief amongst non chritians that the bible is full of errors,.ewhaddix said:Non-believers try to say God doesn't exist and then back it up by saying the Bible has errors. That entire argument becomes a farce if you ignore the man made concept of Biblical infallibility.
ewhaddix said:The Bible doesn't have to be perfect for God to be real and perfect himself. Everyone knows that the Bible is just the word of God written down by inspired men.
Anyone that has studied the Greek texts knows the problem of Variances in them.We will have to just agree to disagree on this one. I believe God is perfect in every way. But I don't believe the Bible (which was written by men) is perfect.
I'm not sure if this is the right place to post this but here goes... I want to start off by saying that I'm not here to deconvert anybody, insult anybodys religious beliefs, or imply disrespect. So my question is, what makes the god of the Christian bible anymore significant/real than the rest of the gods still worshipped today? Jews claim that the Torah is proof of the same god that Christians believe in yet is quite different on the important aspects. Muslims believe Allah is the true god and say that the Qur'an is proof of such. The Hindus have various scriptures that they provide as proof of their god, Lord Krishna, including the Bhagvadgita, the 5 Vedas, the Ramayana and more. Taoists also have various scriptures to prove their various gods including Tao Te Ching, Zhuangzi and, Daozang. So to reiterate, I am asking what makes the bible more true than the rest of the religious scriptures still followed today?
There is another posibility in which he inspired all of them but none of them got it quite right.Either God spoke through the OT and NT prophets or he spoke through buddah, or hare krishna, or rev. moon, or whoever But God didn't speak though all of them and contradict himself like we humans often do.
every forum I post in is the wrong forum to post in for what I'm posting because apparently you guys don't wanna hear what I have to post so I'm just gonna stop posting.
Historical veracity, simply enough.I'm not sure if this is the right place to post this but here goes... I want to start off by saying that I'm not here to deconvert anybody, insult anybodys religious beliefs, or imply disrespect. So my question is, what makes the god of the Christian bible anymore significant/real than the rest of the gods still worshipped today? Jews claim that the Torah is proof of the same god that Christians believe in yet is quite different on the important aspects. Muslims believe Allah is the true god and say that the Qur'an is proof of such. The Hindus have various scriptures that they provide as proof of their god, Lord Krishna, including the Bhagvadgita, the 5 Vedas, the Ramayana and more. Taoists also have various scriptures to prove their various gods including Tao Te Ching, Zhuangzi and, Daozang. So to reiterate, I am asking what makes the bible more true than the rest of the religious scriptures still followed today?
every forum I post in is the wrong forum to post in for what I'm posting because apparently you guys don't wanna hear what I have to post so I'm just gonna stop posting.
I'm not sure if this is the right place to post this but here goes... I want to start off by saying that I'm not here to deconvert anybody, insult anybodys religious beliefs, or imply disrespect. So my question is, what makes the god of the Christian bible anymore significant/real than the rest of the gods still worshipped today? Jews claim that the Torah is proof of the same god that Christians believe in yet is quite different on the important aspects. Muslims believe Allah is the true god and say that the Qur'an is proof of such. The Hindus have various scriptures that they provide as proof of their god, Lord Krishna, including the Bhagvadgita, the 5 Vedas, the Ramayana and more. Taoists also have various scriptures to prove their various gods including Tao Te Ching, Zhuangzi and, Daozang. So to reiterate, I am asking what makes the bible more true than the rest of the religious scriptures still followed today?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?