- Jul 30, 2005
- 7,825
- 403
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Single
- Politics
- US-Democrat
I know that we live in increasingly globalizing political and economic worlds and that one's employment prospects may depend on being fluent in more than just his/her native language. But I sense that multilingualism is hailed for more than its practical utility. It's like we are supposed to believe that monolingual people are somehow backwards, inadequately educated, unrefined, culturally deficient, etc.
I don't get it.
Maybe a lot of people think that by learning several languages as kids people grow up to excel more in school and, consequently, it has become a fad that public thinkers have fallen for.
I would argue, on the contrary, that by taking one small part of the many past and present human cultures, language, and putting it on a pedestal people are undermining true knowledge and appreciation of cultural diversity. That is nice that you can fluently speak and write so many languages, but what can you tell me about the diet of the people of Easter Island or the family structure of pre-Industrial people in the contemporary world? In most cases, probably nothing.
I don't get it.
Maybe a lot of people think that by learning several languages as kids people grow up to excel more in school and, consequently, it has become a fad that public thinkers have fallen for.
I would argue, on the contrary, that by taking one small part of the many past and present human cultures, language, and putting it on a pedestal people are undermining true knowledge and appreciation of cultural diversity. That is nice that you can fluently speak and write so many languages, but what can you tell me about the diet of the people of Easter Island or the family structure of pre-Industrial people in the contemporary world? In most cases, probably nothing.