Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Every "code" know to man has required a mind to create it. Whether it is a written sentence, computer code, or a genetic code found in DNA.When the process to get it is also complicated it's rather likely though that intelligence was needed.
We agree.Every "code" know to man has required a mind to create it. Whether it is a written sentence, computer code, or a genetic code found in DNA.
Why do you think this is so?When the process to get it is also complicated it's rather likely though that intelligence was needed.
Proof needed.Intelligence can explain what we find in reality, dead unconscious purposeless laws of nature can not.
I find it much easier to believe that a universe that has existed for nearly fourteen billion years (try for a moment to comprehend how long that is) managed to produce life than that the God of Christianity exists and demands that I worship him.An atheist should believe dead unconscious purposeless forces could have done it, since it is much much simpler than living nature.
Okay, but again, I don't think you're going to posit that I am a god because I am a programmer.What you talked about came from a ...mind....That you can't disagree with.
Good for them. Even if something intelligent created the universe -- which I doubt -- that doesn't make it the God of Christianity.It is the belief of many, many people that the intelligent mind was that of diety.
Why would anyone think this is not so??Why do you think this is so?
Indeed. (?)Proof needed.
You have mutated brains.I find it much easier to believe that a universe that has existed for nearly fourteen billion years (try for a moment to comprehend how long that is) managed to produce life than that the God of Christianity exists and demands that I worship him.
No evidence??Why would anyone think this is not so??
Why yes I do, as do you.You have mutated brains.
Are you kidding??No evidence??
That's not only about living nature obviously.i said:When the process to get it is also complicated it's rather likely though that intelligence was needed.
You're an atheist...don't worry about a thing. Eat, drink and be merry.
No dude, it means: You have made your choices, good luck with it.Owkay.
I'll take that as a "your point is too hard, so I'll just back out".
No dude, it means: You have made your choices, good luck with it.
The complexity I clearly demonstrated in post 513 tells us a mind was required to create DNA and its information containing code.
It becomes readly apparent that the extremely complex and sophisticated DNA code with all of its information was intelligently designed and could not have possibly evolved through a process of gradual unguided random chance and natural selection.
It is the belief of many, many people that the intelligent mind was that of diety.
When the process to get it is also complicated it's rather likely though that intelligence was needed.
Intelligence can explain what we find in reality
, dead unconscious purposeless laws of nature can not
An atheist should believe dead unconscious purposeless forces could have done it, since it is much much simpler than living nature.
Why would anyone think this is not so??
Indeed, we can't do that. The thing is off course, we don't need to.
Just like we don't need to completely recreate a murder, to solve the murder.
Just like we don't need to completely recreate a volcano eruption, to know that such an event took place somewhere.
Just like we don't need to recreate an asteroid impact, to know it occured in new mexico some 65 million years ago.
Not.
Any biologist will agree that we can't recreate 3.6 billion years worth of evolution in a lab.
All those biologists will also agree that we don't need to and that it is not required, to know that evolution occured.
No, it makes no sense. The evolutionary process takes eons of time. Unless you lived to be millions and millions of years old, you could not observe it in the lab. However, with bacteria, yes, I can had and been engendered and observed in the lab.
Every "code" know to man has required a mind to create it. Whether it is a written sentence, computer code, or a genetic code found in DNA.
This suggest that you think that it IS so, simply because you can't imagine another explanation. Is that the case?
Because if it is, then you just commited to a textbook version of the argument from ignorance.
If it is not the case, then please give an actual reason for why you think that "complex = intelligent".
Simply asserting "god-dun-it" explains exactly nothing.
Models describing natural phenomena actually do have actual explanatory power.
So you agree that a different approach is used instead of waiting for 3.6 billion years to complete such a lab cycle.
Now the logical question is how reliable is your new approach which is never used in other science?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?