Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Nope. And I'll bet you can't prove that it does without sounding silly.
Ignorance is bliss, they say, but i'm not jealous...
I was afraid so...
This means you're blinded.
Perhaps I'm just simple minded but it would seem to me that if a man claimed to come from God, claimed that he would die and then rise again, and then died and rose again then this would challenge the idea that there is no God who interacts with the natural world. Is that silly?
Evolution says nothing whatsoever about God, God's existence, or God's feelings about the natural world. Whoever told you otherwise lied to you.
It is you who misses something.Meh, you've got nothing.
Tough guy.Step up or shut up.
Let me just ask. If you became convinced that the resurrection of the Jesus found in the Gospels really took place would it make you reconsider naturalistic evolution?
Not here. I'll pull that rabbit out of the hat in some other thread.
You should note that I did not say that the resurrection of Jesus challenges evolution as such. Rather, it challenges (as I said) "the wholesale naturalistic conception of evolution" which would include the assumption that there is no God who interacts with the natural world.
Where does evolution assume there is no God?
Exactly, bhsmte.Ignorance of what?
...and never has...Naturalistic evolution assumes that no gods interact with the world.
Tell me, does the actual theory of evolution, state there is no God?
It is you who misses something.
Comparing gravity to evolution...
COME ON !
Tough guy.
You want me to spoon feed you, or will you make a little effort with the braincells yourself?
You should note that I did not say that the resurrection of Jesus challenges evolution as such. Rather, it challenges (as I said) "the wholesale naturalistic conception of evolution" which would include the assumption that there is no God who interacts with the natural world.
Then you seem to have posted in the wrong thread, since this thread is about evidence against the theory of evolution, not a philosophical concept of evolution.Evolution as such does not. But I've always explicitly been referring to "the wholesale naturalistic conception of evolution".
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?