Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
You have no evidence for that, unless you're referring to Moses being the author / editor of Genesis.
None the less, a couple of verses are under debate, as they are missing in certain codices.
I guess that's what youŕe referring to.
Why can't humans evolve gradually?
No. That is a problem for people who regect evidence and then say 'Look! No evidence!'
Iḿ not sure what you're referring to, other that what i mentioned.I've got gobs of evidence for that...from Christian Biblical scholars, no less. It is well known within Biblical academia that scribes added to, and subtracted from the Bible, over the years.
You mean atheists?
How do you know? Just a gut feeling?
I do.Say "no evidence" is the worst excuse an intelligent man can make. I never use that. (do you use it?)
I'm sorry, your convincing point that she WAS a forgery... sorry, where is it?
I stand corrected.Now's the time where you use, you know, actual facts to point out how his argument is flawed (or admit that you're wrong/lying).
I do.
I see no evidence for evolution, as in DNA coding itself by naturalistic means.
Irreducible systems wouldn't even survive and / or thrive when not yet complete and functional.
Thereś no evidence for incomplete systems in organisms either.
Could you kindly form this as a syllogism? i.e.Everyone can see the sky. But I see the sky as an evidence of God. Many many don't and can't.
Why not? Why is it so difficult for you to grasp the idea that when you make these massive claims, you need to provide evidence alongside them?There is not enough time for the development of intelligence if evolved gradually.
Ooh, that pointer is just stuck on max..
Seeing the sky is not exactly comparable with not seeing evidence for a mechanism that codes DNA to get new characteristics.I don't say "no evidence" because I know very well that many things DO have evidences, but people simply can not see them. So have or have no evidence depends on the ability of the person, but not on the existence of evidence.
Everyone can see the sky. But I see the sky as an evidence of God. Many many don't and can't.
Same question. Can you please form this as a syllogism?Seeing the sky is not exactly comparable with not seeing evidence for a mechanism that codes DNA to get new characteristics.
Which question was that?Same question.
Well, when no evidence is present, no evidence is present.Can you please form this as a syllogism?
Wait, isn't your argument that mechanisms that code for new traits in DNA is evidence of God? Or is your argument simply that we don't have an explanation for the mechanisms that code for new traits in DNA?Well, when no evidence is present, no evidence is present.
No.Wait, isn't your argument that mechanisms that code for new traits in DNA is evidence of God?
No, the mechanism just isn't there.Or is your argument simply that we don't have an explanation for the mechanisms that code for new traits in DNA?
P1: The Sky existsCould you kindly form this as a syllogism? i.e.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?