Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
What kind of life form would you need to show up for you to believe it happens?
Your two video clips in signature demonstrated it.Drastically different, how?
New forms do gradually show up in the wild. All the time.Animals. Such as fish, bird, beast, etc. A new form gradually showed up in the wild. Fossils not counted.
In your own words? If you understand your argument?Your two video clips in signature demonstrated it.
Animals. Such as fish, bird, beast, etc. A new form gradually showed up in the wild. Fossils not counted.
How can it be shown gradually if fossils are not used?
What's that supposed to mean? That gives me nothing, do you not know?"The nail in the coffin that was the lynchpin"
Why?THAT is the problem of evolution.
But, for human evolution(?), that is only a minor problem. If there is a set of skeletons looks like life forms between monkey and human, where and how do you make a cut to separate? A smooth transition does not work in this case. It must be an abrupt and quick change.
Why what?Why?
Science as a field does not accept frauds, including those that support the mainstream, well-accepted theories. Fossils are impossible to fake so well that no procedure will reveal the fake, and the fossils are not accepted until all the possible testing has been done. I will walk you through her skeleton, which was the first of many fossils of that species found.Yeah, convincing point bro.
God bless you.
Yes, in denominational churches, non-demnominational people use Bibles that include them all usually, that does not say anything about the authenticity of the writings...Funny thing is that the "they" you speak of relating to what has been told to me, are Christian Biblical scholars. There's even a term for it: interpolations. And yes, there is a ton of evidence for it. Here is a start:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Bible_verses_not_included_in_modern_translations
Some verses have been removed from some Bible translations, and remain in others. Some translations do not remove any of them at all.
Hits on Google Scholar do indicate how often a subject gets treated in the scientific community. As for Harry Potter, yes of course there are hits on Google Scholar too. Some of them for publications authored by, for example, "Harry Potter", "Harry M. Potter", "Harry W. Potter Jr.", but most of them concerning interesting topics such as "A goblin or a dirty nose? The treatment of culture-specific references in translations of the Harry Potter books", "Harry Potter and international relations", "Marketing for Muggles: The Harry Potter way to higher profits".Google hits are not evidence.
Google "Harry Potter" for example.
THAT is the problem of evolution.
But, for human evolution(?), that is only a minor problem. If there is a set of skeletons looks like life forms between monkey and human, where and how do you make a cut to separate? A smooth transition does not work in this case. It must be an abrupt and quick change.
Yes, in denominational churches, non-demnominational people use Bibles that include them all usually, that does not say anything about the authenticity of the writings...
Yes, in an ideal world, science would be based solely on facts.Science as a field does not accept frauds, including those that support the mainstream, well-accepted theories.
a couple of verses are under debate, as they are missing in certain codices.I'm speaking specifically about verses which are known to be interpolations (supplemental verses added much later--decades and centuries later--by scribes).
oops quoted myself...
...and again...
You mean atheists?No. That is a problem for people who reject evidence and then say 'Look! No evidence!'
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?