- Dec 25, 2003
- 42,070
- 16,820
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Atheist
- Marital Status
- Private
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Don't be put off by the negative comments here - watch the DVDs and you will see how you are being deceived by all the evolutionist propaganda around us today.
Have you seen the DVD? If not, perhaps you should. You may find it quite enlightening.
Iĺl give you that there's ambiguous stuff out there too though, but so it Piltdown man and many other forgeries.
That to date, there has been no evidence of Evolution.
That depends on which evolutionary theory you mean.
The general theory, or the Darwinist one.
But, ToE is the term used for Darwinism.
Lucy is one of them.
You're now suggesting the general theory of relativity is related to the theory of evolution?
Yeah, convincing point bro.If you think Lucy was a forgery, you either don't know anything about her or you don't know what the word forgery means.
But that doesn't stop you from having a strong emotionally charged opinion about it...I'm not familiar with the different theories, just the one.
I don't like Hovind either.Please, tell us all about these other theories (and I hope you're not going full Hovind on us).
Assumptions is what your worldview is based on, it seems...He's probably talking about the "general theory of evolution" which exists only in the fevered imaginations of Creationists like Kent Hovind.
Hereditary diseases is evidence for mutations that survived.Got any science to back this up?
Evolution acts on ANYTHING that can create copies of itself where those copies have slight variations. Since humans can make more humans and those new humans are not exactly the same as the humans that came before them, humans will indeed evolve over generations.
Google hits are not evidence.How odd. A check of Google Scholar shows 300,000+ hits just for "mammal evolution". That's a lot of evidence for one small part of the subject.
https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=mammal+evolution&btnG=&hl=en&as_sdt=0,31
I'm sorry, your convincing point that she WAS a forgery... sorry, where is it?Yeah, convincing point bro.
God bless you.
Yeah, convincing point bro.
God bless you.
Got any science to back this up?
Evolution acts on ANYTHING that can create copies of itself where those copies have slight variations. Since humans can make more humans and those new humans are not exactly the same as the humans that came before them, humans will indeed evolve over generations.
An over-simplification, but basically correct -- unlike some of the things that creationists say about mutations
Mutations exist. The changes to traits that they cause also exist. So we're good on this point.
We're not doing the filtering. What's doing the filtering is the competition to survive and produce offspring. Mutations that increase survival and reproduction survive the filtering better. This is all easily observed in lab and in the wild.
Do we ever see a new life form evolved out in the wild? I guess it is not that uncommon to see a life form extinct in the wild.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?