Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
The trend being extinction.
Popular science shows you a trend and they line up fossils for it.
Yes, some animals look alike.
So do cars.
What is LOW?
No, it's several events.Extinction is an event, not a trend.
You will have to listen first.Yes, they lined them up and show it to people. It is good for them to do that. We can not deny what we see. We need to explain it.
Valleys are low, but what is low when you said: that is LOW ?Low is, well, low.
Relevance?Yes, animals are dumb. We are smart. Quite different.
Why do we deserve anything better than we have?
You need morethan just the "special theory of evolution", because that doesn't go beyond changes within the kind.What else do you see as necessary for speciation, then?
This does not make it a different kind of organism.A disinclination or inability to mate with a portion of a previously interbreeding group has pretty much set a divide between the two populations.
You need more than just the "special theory of evolution", because that doesn't go beyond changes within the kind.This does not make it a different kind of organism.
That's their cognitive dissonance avoiding trump card... anything "good" in nature is evidence of design, anything "bad" is attributed to the fall.Does "creation" explain why I had impacted wisdom teeth, or eyes of well less than ideal design?
Does a line of photos of me on my birthday for 20 years show a trend of growth?Popular science shows you a trend and they line up fossils (or fossil interpretations) for it.
Yeah, great analogy...Does a line of photos of me on my birthday for 20 years show a trend of growth?
Wha...?Yeah, great analogy...
Have a look at what you're defending, as should all of you evolutionists:
http://www.christianforums.com/posts/69512317/
Tha.. !Wha...?
Can't help but note many of those quoted aren't scientists. And who the heck is "lt more"?Tha.. !
sorry, here's the right link to OP:
http://www.christianforums.com/threads/revealing-quotes-from-revered-scientists.7942332/
I think you mean "some", but they're all part of the scientific community and the church of naturalism.Can't help but note many of those quoted aren't scientists.
Louis Trenchard More (1870-1944), a humanist.And who the heck is "lt more"?
Then the thread title is misleading.I think you mean "some", but they're all part of the scientific community and the church of naturalism.
Louis Trenchard More (1870-1944), a humanist.
I'm not working on "deserve", I'm working on the idea of a loving deity with infinite competence...
That's their cognitive dissonance avoiding trump card... anything "good" in nature is evidence of design, anything "bad" is attributed to the fall.
A little...Then the thread title is misleading.
Both sides do this.But it is a beautiful self-working trick.
Very similar. False dichotomy is one of the main tools they use.But it is a beautiful self-working trick.
There is a related one found in a variety of forms (I've seen it in politics and business as well as religion)
"Those who agree with us are wise, enlightened, good.
Those who disagree with us are foolish, blind, evil."
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?