Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Because that verse is talking about unbelieving adults and has nothing to do with children being unclean or holy...
Yes, well my wife teaches high school and I view them as not children either.
It is referring to infants and little children, like the ones Jesus says for such is the kingdom of heaven. The disciples rebuked the people bringing to Him the little children and HE said do not prevent them from coming to me , they were trying to keep them away from Him. And HE blessed them.
What did Paul mean in 1 Corinthians 7: 14 when he said children of a believer are holy, not unclean?
At what age does your "holy" child become a sinner, who needs a Savior?
Or do you think they are already saved, if their parents are believers.
.
They were not Pelagians either.What you have described was not the Theology of the Early Church before Augustine. All of the Early Church Fathers before Augustine held to a different viewpoint of free will.
.
That seems to be in all the Greek manuscripts and properly translated in the English:Augustine's inferior Latin version of Romans 5:12 led him to believe that not only was Adam's sin nature inherited by all men,
Centuries later. Maybe you can share the better 21st Century translations you rely on to prove your assertions?I don't know how you go back and "revise" someone's writings who is long dead? But there are obviously people studying and correcting his mistakes.
Dr. Ken Wilson has written a simplified version of his book on the origin of what has come to be known as "Calvinism".
The title of the new book is "The Foundation of Augustinian-Calvinism".
The book reveals the fact that after about 25 years of ministry Augustine changed his view on election, in order to justify infant baptism.
Augustine decided that infant baptism was correct, and then set about to find the scripture which proved him correct.
Paul's writing came from God. It was God breathed.1Co 7:12 But to the rest speak I, not the Lord: If any brother hath a wife that believeth not, and she be pleased to dwell with him, let him not put her away.
1Co 7:13 And the woman which hath an husband that believeth not, and if he be pleased to dwell with her, let her not leave him.
1Co 7:14 For the unbelieving husband is sanctified by the wife, and the unbelieving wife is sanctified by the husband: else were your children unclean; but now are they holy.
1Co 7:15 But if the unbelieving depart, let him depart. A brother or a sister is not under bondage in such cases: but God hath called us to peace.
1Co 7:16 For what knowest thou, O wife, whether thou shalt save thy husband? or how knowest thou, O man, whether thou shalt save thy wife?
When viewed in context, the instructions above came from Paul, instead of God.
Paul was showing that the believing spouse could be preaching the Gospel to the unbelieving spouse, and children.
.
Paul's writing came from God. It was God breathed.
Perhaps Mr. Wilson and everyone here should actually read what Augustine wrote and what exactly he was responding to? Instead of cherry picking a few lines from a very long discourse on Grace and Free Will.
He should get his money back. He hasn’t a clue what Augustine argued.Dr. Kenneth M. Wilson did his doctoral dissertation at Oxford by reading all of the writings of Augustine, in the original language, in chronological order.
His complete findings are found in the 389 page work titled, "Augustine's Conversion from Traditional Free Choice to "Non-free Free Will".
I have a copy of the book in my library.
.
The Word of God is perfect, but were the Apostles perfect?
If Paul said the advice given in a passage came from him, instead of God, then I believe him.
"BABerean2, p
You do not understand scripture because of this error. Paul was saying he was not directly quoting Jesus.
Peter called Pauls writing scripture...that is the word of God written; find a bible teaching church and begin to learn truth.Thank God for the Bible, which others here can read for themselves, and make up their own mind.
1 Corinthians 7:12
(CJB) To the rest I say -- I, not the Lord: if any brother has a wife who is not a believer, and she is satisfied to go on living with him, he should not leave her.
(ESV) To the rest I say (I, not the Lord) that if any brother has a wife who is an unbeliever, and she consents to live with him, he should not divorce her.
(Geneva) But to ye remnant I speake, & not ye Lord, If any brother haue a wife, ye beleeueth not, if she be cotent to dwell with him, let him not forsake her.
(Greek NT TR) τοις δε λοιποις εγω λεγω ουχ ο κυριος ει τις αδελφος γυναικα εχει απιστον και αυτη συνευδοκει οικειν μετ αυτου μη αφιετω αυτην
(GW) I (not the Lord) say to the rest of you: If any Christian man is married to a woman who is an unbeliever, and she is willing to live with him, he should not divorce her.
(LITV-TSP) But to the rest I say, not the Lord, if any brother has an unbelieving wife, and she consents to live with him, let him not leave her.
(KJV) But to the rest speak I, not the Lord: If any brother hath a wife that believeth not, and she be pleased to dwell with him, let him not put her away.
(KJV+) ButG1161 to theG3588 restG3062 speakG3004 I,G1473 notG3756 theG3588 Lord:G2962 If anyG1536 brotherG80 hathG2192 a wifeG1135 that believeth not,G571 andG2532 sheG846 be pleasedG4909 to dwellG3611 withG3326 him,G846 let him notG3361 put her away.G863 G846
(NKJV) But to the rest I, not the Lord, say: If any brother has a wife who does not believe, and she is willing to live with him, let him not divorce her.
(YLT) And to the rest I speak—not the Lord—if any brother hath a wife unbelieving, and she is pleased to dwell with him, let him not send her away;
.
What I quoted from was not the Vulgate. Romans 5 confirms we all inherit the sin of Adam.Do you think the Latin Vulgate is the best? Didn't say anything about 21 century translations BTW.
Paul explains why he circumcised Timothy.The writing is God breathed, but did the Apostles ever make an error in judgment, and does the scripture reveal those errors?
Why did Paul have to correct Peter in dealing with the Galatians.
Why did Paul have Timothy circumcised, but not Titus?
The Word of God is perfect, but were the Apostles perfect?
If Paul said the advice given in a passage came from him, instead of God, then I believe him.
.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?